Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login

Guide to Finding Doctors Credentials & Ratings

Hugo (91)
Hugo

MDNationwide

An American Universal Health Care System

Posted Monday, August 17, 2009 (97 days 2 hours ago.) Viewed 22 times.

In this article, we discuss some facts, statistics, and negative aspects of a universal health care plan for America. Real health care reform is a complex issue; therefore it's not possible to cover every aspect of universal health care or reform of the current system in this short article. However we will cover as much ground with the limited space available. 

Health Care System Needs Reform, Not a Government Takeover

Believe it or not, America boasts some of the world's best doctors, the most advanced health care system, and the most technically superior resources in the world, bar none. Those who travel globally and have gotten sick know that their first choice for treatment would be in the U.S. Though health care in America is, more expensive than any other country, many of the worlds wealthiest come to the U.S for surgical procedures and complex care, because it holds a worldwide reputation for the gold standard in health care.

To examine the complex health care issue, a small research study was conducted from randomly selected doctors in mdnationwide.org's best doctors database. We ask 50 top doctors, located in different states and who practice different specialty fields, " Is a universal health care plan good for America?" Forty-eight of these doctors essentially responded that it was a "bad idea" that would have negative impacts on the quality of our nation's health care.

Social Engineering Your Health Care

One of the greatest mis-conceptions some people have relied on with regard to the health care debate is that, given a universal health care system, every person in the U.S. would receive the highest quality health care - the kind our nation is renowned for and that we currently receive. However, unlike some public amenities, health care is not a collective public service like police and fire protection services, therefore the Government cannot provide the same quality of health care to everyone, because not all physicians are equally good orthopedic surgeons, internists, neurosurgeons, etc, in the same way that not all individuals in need of health care are equally good patients.

As an analogy - stay with me - when you design a software program, there are many elements that are coded on the back-end, and used to manipulate certain aspects of the software program, that your average "John Doe" who uses the software (the end user) does not understand or utilize, nor do they care about these elements. Certain aspects of the program are coded, so that when one uses that portion of the program, other elements of the program are manipulated and automatically follow the present or next command.

Likewise, once a universal health care plan is implemented in America and its massive infrastructure is shaped, private insurance companies will slowly disappear, and as a result, eventually patients will automatically be forced to utilize the government's universal health care plan. As part of such a system, patients will be known as numbers rather than patients, because such a massive government program would provide compensation incentive based on care provided, patients would become "numbers," rather than "patients." In addition, for cost savings reasons, every bit of health information, including your own, will be analyzed, and stored by the Government. What are the consequences? If you're a senior citizen and need a knee replacement at the age of 70, the government may determine that you're to old and it's not worth the investment cost, therefore instead of surgery, you may be given medication for the rest of your life at a substantial cost savings to the government, and at a high quality of life price to you.

Solutions:

Fixing the current U.S. health care system might require that we;

1. Encourage prevention and early diagnosis of chronic conditions and management.

2. Completely reform existing government health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid.

3. Forgive medical school debt for those willing to practice primary care in under-served areas.

4. Improve access to care, provide small businesses and the self-employed with tax credits, not penalties for providing health care.

5. Encourage innovation in medical records management to reduce costs.

6. Require tort reform in medical malpractice judgments to lower the cost of providing care.

7. Keep what isn't broken-research shows 80% of Americans are happy with their current insurance, therefore, why completely dismantle it?

8. Reimburse physicians for their services.

9. Innovate a system in which Medicare fraud is dramatically decreased.

Devil In the Details

Socialized medicine means:

1. Loss of private practice options, reduced pay for physicians, overwhelming numbers of patients, and increasing burn-out may reduce the number of doctors pursuing the profession.

2. Patient confidentiality will need to be compromised, since centralized health care information will be maintained by the government and it's databases.

3. Healthy people who take care of themselves will pay for the burden of those with unhealthy lifestyles, such as those who smoke, are obese, etc.

4. Patients lose the incentive to stay healthy or aren't likely to take efforts to curb their prescription drug costs because health care is free and the system can easily be abused.

5. The U.S. Government will need to call the shots about important health decisions dictating what procedures are best for you, rather than those decisions being made by your doctor(s), which will result in poor individualized patient care.

6. Tax rates will rise substantially-universal health care is not free since citizens are required to pay for it in the form of taxes.

7. Your freedom of choice will be restricted as to which doctor is best for you and your family.

8. Like all public programs, government bureaucracy, even in the form of health care, does not promote healthy competition that reduces costs based on demand. What's more, accountability is limited to the budgetary resources available to police such a system.

9. Medicare is subsidized by private insurers to the tune of billions of dollars, therefore if you take them out of the equation, add a trillion dollars or more to the current trillion dollar- plus cost estimates.

10. Currently, the government loses an estimated $30 billion a year due to Medicare fraud. Therefore, what makes anyone think that this same government will be able to run & operate a universal health care system that is resistant to fraud and save money while doing so?.

 


        Comments (0)


Free Doctor Ratings Sites

Posted Saturday, December 20, 2008 (337 days 13 hours ago.) Viewed 245 times.

Doctor-Ratings Methodologies

Each establishment uses its own methodology with regard to offering doctor ratings. Now more than ever, companies design their own back-end proprietary software applications to better serve their customers. From search-engine technologies to doctor-ratings technologies, the message is clear: It has only begun. Where Can I Find Doctor Ratings?

Some companies allow you to search their free doctor-ratings databases. These databases generally offer limited ratings, however, and usually are compiled from patients' ratings. The good news about these services is that the information is mostly free; on the other hand, you get what you pay for.

Doctor-Rating Process

Here's what some companies are doing: They design and input data into a database. Then they design, code, optimize, and publish templates, so that when John Doe searches for a doctor on any search engine, the template webpage for each doctor will rank high on search engines. How is this accomplished? First, the company must get the search engine "spider" to crawl its templates and index the database of doctors' names, so that when the particular doctor's name is searched, the template page will be available, and the patient/consumer can rate the doctor. Then, the information is channeled and compiled to that specific doctor's profile. The problem with these systems is that they can be easily manipulated; therefore, the information tends to be inaccurate or outdated.

Quality Doctor-Ratings Process

Systems are designed to find and analyze a doctor's rating through a series of categories, such as:

  • Disciplinary actions


  • Malpractice judgments


  • Internship, residency, and fellowship training


  • Membership affiliations


  • Board certifications


  • Publications


  • Special expertise


  • Additional training


  • Recognition awards

These factors are important to consider in determining a doctor's overall rating analysis.

New Century Doctor-Ratings

As the new century unfolds and companies continue to expand their execution services, advanced applications will continue to be designed. Although methodologies do vary, mimicking the way credit bureaus use their ratings system for credit scores, and applying some of those methodologies to a doctor-ratings application might be just what the doctor ordered.

Free Doctor Ratings

Although it's beneficial to browse the free doctor-ratings sites to gather information, it's always best to collect relevant information from credible establishments that specialize strictly in providing doctor-background reports. Ultimately, you may find that taking this extra step is worth the money charged for the service.

Accuracy of Doctor Ratings

While some doctors may disagree with such ratings, one thing is certain: There is no universal agreement or magical solution that can guarantee that consumers will receive 100 percent accurate information. Just remember: An informed patient makes better healthcare decisions.


        Comments (0)


Online Doctor Ratings Services

Posted Wednesday, December 17, 2008 (340 days 23 hours ago.) Viewed 60 times.

Sites that offer free doctor ratings often put banner ads or Google Adsense ads, both of which are paid by advertisers, on their sites to bring in revenue. Therefore, they are able to maintain these sites with limited daily operations.

With so many new sites offering free anonymous doctor ratings and information about physicians' credentials, consumers expect to be able to find out everything about their doctors. However, because anybody can sign up and add positive or negative feedback regarding their experience with a particular physician, no patient potential patients should take these ratings seriously. While they may be helpful, these ratings can easily be manipulated by a patient, doctor, hospital staff, or anybody online; the reality is that, no matter hood good, how bad, or how renowned the physician is, every physician will have some negative information, since it's virtually impossible to satisfy everyone. Whether the ratings on a site are for professionals, products, or service companies, there will be negative information. Even the Goliath Google, which is by far the most successful search engine in the world and, one of the most successful companies in the world, has an unsatisfactory record with the Better Business Bureau.

A Doctors Reputation

Some doctors have begun having their patients sign contracts designed to "respect their physician's privacy on the Internet" by agreeing not to participate in online ratings of doctors. While it's common practice for patients to sign a contract regarding frivolous malpractice lawsuits before they have surgery, these "Internet privacy" contracts are becoming more common because of the ease with which ratings can be manipulated anonymously.

A Better Way

Although the objective factors listed below may not mean much to the average patient, when each category is factored into the total equation, the resulting rating is much more relevant and precise than anonymous ratings.

Academic Appointments

Hospital Appointments

Education

Professional Reputation/Recognition

Awards

Disciplinary History

Experience with Specialty

Community Involvement

Board Certification(s)

Malpractice Judgment(s)

Publications

Professional Affiliations

The average patient cares little about the doctor's license number, expiration date, degree dates, and training dates; however, the database from which this kind of information comes is much more reliable, updated, relevant, and detailed as it relates to a physician's credential, history, and background. Dates that are associated with a doctor's professional history are important because they tie into the experience factor and are much harder to obtain and transfer into a proprietary system, such as a commercial "doctor rating" site.

The Future in Comprehensive Physician Ratings

How It Will Work

1.Software collects and scours data about physician(s), their profiles and histories using an in-house string of doctor credential information databases.

2.The data is analyzed and compared to data for all other specialists in the specified field.

3.Physicians' profiles are matched and compared within the specialty field, using a combination of a customized doctor rating scoring system and other methodologies.

4.The software uses innovative algorithms to calculate each part of a physician's profile.

5.The system combines the doctor's overall ratings with the requested background report.

In a perfect world, doctor ratings would be unnecessary; however, every physician is unique in his or her own area of expertise/special interest, and having tools to find the right physician by word of mouth, reliable doctor ratings services, or referrals will result in an informed patient, which is the best kind of patient there is.


        Comments (1)


 


Archives:

November 2009
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
« Oct
   


All Posts by Hugo

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company