Home » Writer's Blogs » Josh-Greenberger

The Greenberger Files

Josh Greenberger ⁽⁹¹³⁾ Blue Level Author

The Aimless Presidency of Barack Obama

Posted Saturday, July 25, 2009 (105 days 15 hours ago.) Viewed 11 times.

A popular talk show host keeps saying Barack Obama is in a power-grab, trying to grab as much power for the government as possible. But that's giving Obama more credit than he deserves; Obama's utter failure to accomplish a damn thing in office besides drive our country into deeper crisis is, I believe, not an organized plan of any sort. It's something more fundamental than that. This is a man drunk with power and his own perceived glory.

Obama is not about helping the country get through crises. Barack Obama is about Barack Obama. Having gone from total obscurity to the most powerful man on Earth in a matter of months, has, I believe, given Obama the euphoria of a kid in a candy store. His mind is obviously not on our country's serious problems.

Upon his meddling in local affairs by stating that the Boston Police "acted stupidly" by arresting Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, some people have asked, "Doesn't Obama have enough on his plate?" Well, maybe you could make the argument that Obama got so emotionally involved with the issue that he "stupidly" made the statement that he did.

But when Obama subsequently invites both parties to the White House for a beer to make mends, that really tells the story. If you're involved in some serious issues that concern the entire country, do you even have the time to sit down for a beer over such a local issue?

Obama wanted Congress to postpone their vacation so they can focus on his healthcare package. Yet, the other day when he was asked a question by a reporter on that same healthcare package, he said he was not familiar that particular issue -- that issue was on page 16! How could he not have reached even page 16 of his own healthcare package and yet have the time to sit down for a beer on such a federally insignificant issue? Wouldn't he be better off taking his own advise; stay home and read the damn healthcare documentation?

The answer is frightening. Obama literally knows not and cares not what he's doing. He didn't read the very same healthcare package that he's been pushing so hard for because it means nothing to him -- obviously. The man is simply wielding his power and asserting his presidency. It doesn't seem to matter to him what he's doing, as long as he's doing "something" and being perceived as "taking care of things."

He's done nothing to minimize the nuclear threat from Iran, he's done nothing to minimize the nuclear threat from North Korea, he's done nothing to solve even one of our domestic problems, but he did minimize the "threat" to our society from the Boston Police Department and he did stick his nose into the unthinkable "threat" of new settlements in Israel. Do you get the picture we've elected a completely incompetent human being who's only skill is to fool people into believing he stands for something and is doing something?

America is flying rudderless. We have no one in the White House. This is scary stuff. Sure, electing Obama made history -- electing a mule would have made history, too. What good is making history when that same person will turn our country into "history?" What we need to do is make history one more time -- let's be the first ones to impeach and actually kick a president out of office. It's either us or him. Can we do it? "Yes we can?"

by Josh Greenberger

Permalink Comments (1)

Top 10 Signs Your Life Is Too Similar To David Letterman's

Posted Sunday, June 14, 2009 (146 days 23 hours ago.) Viewed 24 times.

10 - Your wife says she's never loved anyone like she loves you. For less than $600.

9 - You get home from work and find your wife in bed with another talk show host, and she claims he was just pre-screening her for an upcoming event.

8 - Your mailman knows where you keep your condoms.

7 - Seeing an older woman dressed like a slut brings back memories of home when your were a child.

6 - Your son wants a dress for Christmas.

5 - Your son gets kicked out of school for groping his teacher. And the teacher says he doesn't tolerate this kind of behavior; unless he gets taken out to dinner first.

4 - Your son says he want to get married when he's forty. As soon as he graduates High School.

3 - You didn't realize how much your son looked like you until your wife took him to the zoo and zoo officials tried to lure him into a cage with a banana.

2 - You never take your wife out in public, so people start asking if you cover her face when you're having sex.

1 - You don't socialize much because you're afraid people might find out that the act you've been putting on about being a loser is not an act.

God bless Alaska Governor Sarah Palin! The best candidate for just about any position in America. May she win the next Presidential election. It would be a sin if she didn't run. After Barak Obama gets through with this country, Americans will run in droves to vote for Plain; Democrats, Republicans, Independents, co-dependents, non-dependents, you name it! Run, Palin, Run!

by JoshGreenberger.com

Permalink Comments (0)

The Myth That Speciation Is Evolution

Posted Friday, June 12, 2009 (149 days 3 hours ago.) Viewed 31 times.

You often hear evolutionists point to speciation as evidence of evolution. This couldn't be farther from the truth. A process that transforms one species into another in an orderly fashion, regardless of whether it happens "overnight" or over a long period of time, is not an evolutionary process -- nothing evolves! This is a transformation. A metamorphosis that produces no chaos, or the same "chaos" every time, as a byproduct, is the result of design or planning.

The ONLY way speciation can be considered evolution is if it produces a myriad of randomly disfigured, dysfunctional organisms for every functional one. There have been no such findings in the lab or in the field. The vast majority of life forms in the fossil record seem to have emerged well-designed and functional in their first appearance. This is not evolution, although evolutionist like to call it that.

It's asinine enough to believe that a long series of trial and errors can eventually, accidentally evolve a new life form, but to be faced with concrete evidence that no trial and error even occurred and still believe life somehow developed without a plan or design guiding it, is moronic and delusional.

Furthermore, there is no evidence in the fossil record of any species even transforming into another one. The sudden appearance of various life forms shows not even a transformation process. That's not to say this can't happen, there's just no evidence of it in the field.

What evolutionists have done is taken the occasional aberration of nature, like "TikTaalik" and "Ida," and concocted convoluted explanations of how they must have come from one species and evolved into another, because the fossil has some bone structures similar to both.

You don't need bones and fossils for this. So many life forms have eyes, ears, noses and a host of other similar organs; do these even more striking similarities prove all these life forms evolved from one ancestor? Similarities can just as well make an argument for Creation: species have similarities because they were created by the same God.

Well, God, evolutionists point out, is not science. Let me see if I understand this. To say that God created life is not science because you can't prove God's existence. But to say that life created and developed by itself, which is also unprovable, that is science. Just taking God out of the picture makes it science?

Evolutionists make the mistake of thinking that because analyzing biological systems today is a science, any unproven concoction of how it all came about is also science. Evolution falls in the same category of "theories" as "the earth is flat."

Evolution forums are probably the best evidence of how bereft evolution is of any true science. Log on to some forums and you'll find that evolutionists' response to any opposition to their "religion" is usually countered with the most vile, hostile and belligerent language. Most don't even bother to discuss science. Interestingly, those that point out the shortcomings of evolution talk about science in far greater numbers than evolutionists. And there's a reason for this: evolutionists just don't have the science to support their views, while disproofs are in abundance.

Evolution today is no longer a science issue. The theory has been disproven so often from so many different angles it's become like hitting a dead horse. Evolution is basically a struggle between those who need it in their lives and those who don't. Dispelling the godless religion of evolution boils down to spreading the message that "the horse is dead."

by JoshGreenberger.com

Permalink Comments (0)

The Fossil Ida Is An Assault On A Gullible Public

Posted Wednesday, May 20, 2009 (171 days 22 hours ago.) Viewed 56 times.

The fossil Ida is being used by scientists as an assault on a gullible public. One fossil does not represent a transitional species any more than the remains of a two-headed snake represents a transition of snakes from one head to two heads. They're simply aberrations of nature.

You'd need more than one fossil to represent a species, and you'd need many transitional aberrations that couldn't survive to show an evolutionary process was going on.

There are organisms, humans included, which are occasionally born deformed. In the millions of known cases, they haven't been known to drastically change the course of a species.

There are humans with both male and female physical characteristics. Are males evolving into females, or vise versa? Of course not. These are simply anomalies, and don't seem to drastically effect the course of the species.

Caterpillars are crawling creatures that go through a stage called pupa, in which they undergo a complete metamorphosis and emerge as flying creatures. Tadpoles are aquatic, gill-breathing, legless creatures that develop lungs, legs, and other organs to roam on dry land. Some salamanders undergo a metamorphosis which also takes them from an aquatic environment to an air-breathing one.

Although these creatures undergo such drastic changes in only one generation, not one has, in the millions of known cases, ever evolved into anything beyond their usual, known final stage. There is obviously no evolution going on here. A limited number of creatures apparently have the genetic blueprint for transforming into very specific new forms. Perhaps Ida was such a species. But evidence of evolution? There's absolutely nothing to indicate that.

Ida represents the fanciful speculations of a scientific community determined to publicize its biased agenda.

by JoshGreenberger.com
Author of "Human Intelligence Gone Ape" - amazon.com

Permalink Comments (10)

Archives:

November 2009
M	T	W	T	F	S	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30
« Oct

All Posts by Josh Greenberger