| Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login |
RamblingsMario Garibaldi (11,256) ![]() ![]() Mario Garibaldi ![]() Credit Secrets Are You A Total Twitter Yet?Posted Friday, July 11, 2008 (1 year 134 days ago.) Viewed 108 times. The other day I watched this real interesting video about how Twitter works. In case you're sitting there asking yourself: "What's a Twitter?" Here's the short answer: Twitter is a simple way for you to follow your friends online and see what they're up to without having to read emails or read their blogs. You log on and twit. For example, if I have 100 friends on my twitter, I can find out what each is doing the moment they type up an update. Updates could be something as simple as what video they're watching on YouTube, what interesting site they've run into, what they are doing at school or work. Basically, it's like a mini blog in real time. If you are a writer, you could update your friends about what stage you are in your writing or what chapter you have just finished. I suspect that Twitter now has nearly 5,000,000 users and is growing by leaps and bounds with thousands of people joining everyday. What I like about it is that I can plug in my RSS reader into the system and read updates at my convenience as well. Have an article on SearchWarp that you're reading right at this moment, like this one? Well, you could twit all your friends about it so they too can come and see what you're reading! Twitter is just a nice little communications gem that helps people stay in touch quickly and effectively. It's also a great time saver. Most of all, it's free to use! The downside of Twitter is that you can only send messages up to 140 characters so it sort of functions like a text messaging service. That means that people can receive messages on their mobile phones as well, which is OK if they have unlimited texting as part of their service plans. Twitter allows you to let people know what's going on with your life, minute by minute if you want. In my case, my messages would be kind of boring if I went by the minute. Maybe every 3-4 hours something interesting might happen that is worth letting my friends know about. So, I just started with Twitter and started sharing all sorts of mundane things that I'm doing on and offline. If Obama or McCain have free Twitter accounts, we could find out what they're doing everyday but I doubt either one has the time to twit. If you would like to see a video that fully explains what a Twitter is and what it does beyond the scope of this article, then watch this YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddO9idmax0o Permalink Comments (1) Mormons Are Not Polygamists. Period.Posted Tuesday, April 22, 2008 (1 year 214 days ago.) Viewed 188 times. Despite the fact that the media still thinks that Mormons are polygamists and inevitably keeps associating the fiasco in Texas with the COJCOLDS - Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints, it's important to note that the people in Texas is a small group of folks who practice polygamy and that they are not a branch off the official LDS Church.
The LDS Church has insisted that the media notices the difference for obvious reasons. They don't want the public thinking that the two organization are the same. Of course, it doesn't help that the name FLDS is so close to LDS!
So what do we know about the FLDS? Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. First, they're not the Mormons. They're not LDS. The very reason they exist is because the LDS Church expunged polygamy and those who wanted the practice to continue ended up forming their own Church, the FLDS Church.
I won't go into historical details here because it's quite comprehensive and if the topic of polygamy intrigues you, it shouldn't. It's pretty straight foward, actually. One husband and several wives who agree to be in the same house and bear children. The current problem is that, in their religious fervor and by ignoring child protection laws, some of these FLDS men got carried away in their beliefs and have allegedly impregnated underage girls who were married to them. The whole problem stems from the age factor and allegations of sexual abuse.
In the absence of abuse, and if all the girls were married at age 18, this whole fiasco about the FLDS church wouldn't be making national headlines and become the subject of forum and blog posts all over the Internet.
Why can't FLDS men simply wait until the girls turn 18 and then marry them? It seems like a simple issue! Either their religious beliefs ignore child protection laws of the land or the urge to merge simply takes over. From the outside looking in, things look pretty bizarre.
The most important message of this article is that when you hear about the FLDS sect, polygamist, church, compound, etc. just make sure you do not confuse them with the Mormons or members of the official LDS Church based in Salt Lake City, Utah. The LDS Church has been working really hard to underline the differences between them an any polygamist groups. Most Mormons are decent, hard-working people who love Jesus Christ as their Savior, read the Bible, The Book Of Mormon and try their best to do good in their communities. They also have a complex history and their share of antagonists.
No religion has produced perfect people, perfect adepts and most religions have controversial doctrinal or moral issues. But it's not fair to pass judgment on any religion based on the actions of a few and more especially when those few aren't officially or directly attached to the main Church.
In other words, the Catholic Church has had its challenges with sex scandals. That's not to say that the entire Church or its members deserve criticism. There is the good, the bad and the ugly in every organization.
Hopefully, this article will help people distinguish between the LDS Church and the FLDS church or sect as some prefer to call it. The following non-commercial, reference sites have comprehensive information on the subject of Mormonism.
Official LDS Site: http://www.lds.org
Blogs Of Interest: http://www.mormontest.com
Apologetics: http://www.jefflindsay.com
Permalink Comments (4) Mormon This and Mormon That!Posted Wednesday, January 23, 2008 (1 year 304 days ago.) Viewed 358 times.
Unless
you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, chances are you've been hearing
about Mormons in the news. In fact, YouTube is full of videos, mostly against
the LDS faith, or the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. If you want to know more about Mormons and their beliefs, you can visit their official web site at: http://www.lds.org and for answers to any controversial topics, there is an apologetic site located at http://www.fairlds.org
The Book of Mormon, shown above, doesn't impress most
Bible believers mainly because Mormons consider it 'added scripture', 'a new testament' and the
Bible is not supposed to be added to. The book is basically a historical
account of a migrating people who may have lived in the Americas. Among other things, the
book also provides doctrines about salvation, the Ten Commandments, the purpose of life and
a description of a visit from Jesus Christ to his fold in the American
Continent. Many people think these are all crazy stories or that divine beings are human construct. Yet, Bible readers won't deny the fact that there are numerous instances of celestial apparitions and visitations to mere mortals throughout the Old and New Testaments. Of course, there are also those who believe the Bible itself was Constantine's construct to fool Christians into believing in the divinity of Jesus Christ. I guess there are people for every belief out there and even no religious beliefs all. What a wonderful world this is! Mormons aren't strangers to persecution and intellectual attacks on their beliefs. Attacks against Mormonism usually originate from controversial historical account of events, quotes from past leaders, disputes over the truthfulness and originality of the Book Of Mormon as well as interpretations of biblical doctrines. Do divine beings communicate with mere mortals? If they do, then the challenge for anyone considering Mormonism is accepting Joseph Smith's story as he claimed to have been visited by. God, the Father and His Son Jesus Christ in a grove of trees somewhere near his home. There, he was told that other churches of his time weren't true and that there was a lot of lip service going on. "My object in going to inquire of the Lord was to know which of all the sects was right, that I might know which to join. No sooner, therefore, did I get possession of myself, so as to be able to speak, than I asked the Personages who stood above me in the light, which of all the sects was right . . . and which I should join" (Joseph Smith-History 1:10, 18). These personages also wanted Joseph to restore the original Church and the Gospel. As you can imagine, Joseph Smith's story is still shocking to a lot of religious people and still have either a positive or negative effect even though all this allegedly occurred over 160 years ago! Obviously, when Joseph told his story, his adversaries met him with anger. How dare this young farmer declare that he had seen God and that God Himself told him that the other churches weren't true? There was uproar and eventual persecutions. Anyone going around saying that he or she has seen God in person, even in this day and age, is bound to be considered a nut job, true? The question is: is such an event conceivable? After many persecutions and church growth, those who were against Joseph Smith and Mormons in general set up to put an end to Joseph Smith Jr., church founder and leader. He was in prison in Carthage,IL, when the jail was invaded by an armed and angry mob with painted faces, who shot and killed both him and his brother Hyrum Smith. Joseph was in prison awaiting trial for the alleged destruction of a newspaper called Nauvoo Expositor. Hyrum was shot in the face. Joseph was shot and fell out of a window to his death. He was 38 years old. Some people say he was a good man while others say he was a gold-digger and a fraud, it depends on who you ask, which diary entries you believe in and the position and feelings people have towards the LDS church.
After a brief succession crisis over whom should be the new leader and
prophet for the church, Brigham Young took over the fold and brought the
faithful across the plains, finally settling in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Brigham Young himself, a colonizer, prophet and territorial governor, was the
subject of controversy due to his many wives, wealth and leadership.
Regardless, he must have done something right because after his natural death
in 1877, Mormons blossomed and continue to grow until this day.
Mormons believe that Jesus Christ himself directs the affairs of His church
via living prophets. That means that their main leaders are
"inspired" to lead and conduct the affairs of their church. Such
leaders also receive periodic revelations about any number of things related to
the faith. I am not aware of any current prophecies from the LDS church about
any event to occur in the world. Gordon B. Hinckley is a highly accomplished
individual and very few churches can claim a leader who is nearing 100 years of
age and yet is lucid and active in the affairs of his faith. So, Catholics have their Pope and Mormons and Muslims have their prophet. My
guess is that the LDS prophet spends most of his time managing the church as
opposed to making actual prophecies for the rest of us. Unlike dishonest
and conniving, money-hungry TV evangelists, Mr. Hinckley has never appeared on
TV to ask for donations from gullible faithfuls. He has, however, done
interviews with Mike Wallace and some of these interviews have fueled debates
over some of his statements. In 1978, Spencer W. Kimball, President and prophet of the church at the time, allegedly received a revelation stating that from that point on, all worthy black males would be able to receive the Priesthood. Critics of the church feed on this like piranhas on fresh meat because it implies that there was some level or racism going on. They don't believe that the same God who can send a devastating Flood upon the earth and destroy might armies, could also deny some doctrinal benefits to some groups of people. For example, the Bible says that God denied the Priesthood to others except the Levites. Why?
Left
to right: Elder Joseph Sitati (Area Authority Seventy from Kenya), Pres Jackson
T. Mkhabela, Pres. Mledshe (1st Councilor), Pres. Atkins (2nd Councilor), Elder
Scott (Quorum of the Twelve) This remains a hot topic among anti-Mormon circles. Today the LDS church is proselyting, prospering in Africa and converts there don't seem to take issue with the church's questionable past doctrine (policy) about blacks in relationship to the Priesthood. The church has been producing materials and media with a clear objective to show the world that the organization does not discriminate based on race. In fact, its largest body of members is located outside the United States in countries like Mexico and Brazil. Mormons come in all shapes, sizes and ethnic backgrounds.
Some people point out the main leadership of the LDS church continues to be white people. I guess the same question could be asked about the leadership of the United States as whole, couldn't it? Or the leadership of most major corporations? In reference to the church, everything is done by inspiration so obviously inspiration is yet to come from Heaven about placing a black or Hispanic person into the Presidency of the church. That's not to say it couldn't happen someday. Now, before you scream discrimination here, you need to understand that the LDS Presidency follows a certain order and apostles are called from within a group of men called the Seventies. As of this writing there seems to be no black people within the Seventies, only in 'area' Seventies which is something else. But wait again! In the 1990's, the first black person to be called to the position of Seventy was Helvecio Martins, a businessman from Brazil. He served in the position of Seventy for 5 years. Had he stayed in that position, he could have had a chance to be called to be an Apostle in the church. Helvecio Martins died at age 74. Clearly, the LDS church is not discriminatory against blacks. There are people from many countries holding positions of leadership in the church. One of the twelve apostles is actually from Germany. One thing seems clear to me: they obviously don't discriminate against senior citizens since most of the top leaders are old men. What about women? Sorry to disappoint you, but there are no women apostles or women in the Seventies. Women usually lead and manage other organizations within the church. For example the one called Relief Society. There are also organizations for young women that are also led by women. It's safe to say that women are not in charge of revelations for the church but they are often involved in teaching assignments and husband management. Many Mormons like to say that behind every great man, there is always a
great wife. In today's world, many women take issue with religious
submissiveness. My personal experience with Mormons shows that, in many LDS
marriages, the women are actually in charge of things and they tend to be hard
working, good Moms and faithful, with few exceptions to the contrary. Many
women also work outside the home and have professional careers. It's not
unusual for a typical Mormon family to have 4-5 children and lots of
grandchildren. With the exception of the highest leadership in the church, most leaders are volunteers and receive no monetary compensation for their service in the organization, in other words, the church has no paid clergy. It's rumored that the highest leadership receives some form of financial compensation towards "living expenses". Nobody really knows who makes what as that type of information is
confidential. This too, has caused critics of the LDS faith to assume the
worst due in part to the church's multi-billion dollar assets worldwide.
Historically, though, there have been no Benny Hinn types in the Mormon
leadership. It's important to note that many in top leadership positions are
already retired and financially stable (or even rich) in their own right
despite any potential financial compensation they might received from the
church. Mormon bishops are not paid or highly trained for their position. It's understandable that a few might mishandle certain issues brought in to them and become a potential liability to their own local "wards" and even to the entire organization.[1] To my knowledge, the church does not do criminal background checks as a preliminary requirement for membership so it's possible that bad apples can infiltrate the fold and cause damage. The way I see it, it's like blaming the organization for the mistakes or crimes of one individual. Since the church has deep pockets, it's clear to me why money hungry attorneys and alleged victims would bring lawsuits against it. Obviously, some lawsuits may actually have true merit as in the cases brought up against the Catholic church a few years ago. Presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, has attracted a large amount of attention
to the LDS church and himself as a Mormon. If Mr. Romney becomes the next
President, I assume that Mormons will continue to be in the spotlight for the
duration of his term. There are thousands of LDS missionaries serving around the world. Most are
19-21 year olds who aren't theologians, so it's no sense having Bible bashes
with them. They usually work in pairs and have the objective to gather converts
to the church. These young men and women are volunteers and don't get paid to
be missionaries and usually serve their church for 18-24 months. In a nutshell, Mormons are people exercising their freedom of
religion, speech and the liberty to believe whatever they want to believe as true. That's perfectly all right with me. ![]() Mormon Family I suggest that Mormonism is not a cult and that
it's just a different form of Christianity which involves a few different
things that some people find hard to accept. I find many things hard to accept
with many faiths out there. That doesn't mean those faiths aren't true or good
for those who choose to follow them. To each their own. Besides, who is
to judge who is right and who's wrong anyway but the great Jehovah
Himself? Footnotes: [1] Google search entry: +lawsuit +mormon +bishop
Permalink Comments (1) |
Archives:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home |
Page Two |
FAQ's |
Contact |
Terms of Service |
Article Submission Guidelines |
Questions & Answers |
Privacy |
Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company