Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login

Virginia Workers Compensation & Social Security Disability Lawyer

jervalaw (749)
jervalaw

Law Office of Jerry Lutkenhaus

Effort to Change Virginia's Workers' Compensation Death Presumption Fails

Posted Friday, November 06, 2009 (1 day 22 hours ago.) Viewed 4 times.

Virginia has a rather peculiar workers compensation law. If the worker is found dead at the scene of his/her accident, the worker's accident is "presumed" to have arisen out of his work. However, if the worker lives for even a few minutes after his/her accident, then the worker does not receive this death presumption. Then, the worker's dependents can be denied benefits unless there is some other evidence proving how the accident occurred. This of course can be difficult since the best witness is dead.

This can work a real injustice. The worker who dies or loses consciousness as the result of an accident often cannot testify regarding the cause of his accident. Many years ago the Virginia Supreme Court decided to apply a presumption in death cases. This presumption meant if the worker was found dead at the scene of his/her accident it would be "presumed" the accident arose out of his/her work.

In a recent September 2006 case, a worker named Pierce was found unconscious at the scene of his accident. He lived for some months after his accident in a coma but remained comatose. Pierce had over $1,000,000.00 in medical bills. Pierce's widow asked the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission to apply the death presumption to Pierce's case. The Commission declined stating:

"Case law is clear that the death presumption does not apply where the claimant is not found dead at the scene of the accident but rather dies subsequently. The fact that the defendants have stipulated that Mr. Pierce's death was a direct result of his workplace injuries does not alter the claimant's burden of proof requiring that he establish the initial injury as compensable."

In another case, a worker was injured in a motor vehicle accident but lived for 35 minutes. The Commission again refused to apply the presumption and claimant lost because the accident was unexplainable.

An attempt was made in the Virginia Legislature to change the law as a result of the Pierce case. In the 2008-2009 General Assembly a bill was introduced by Virginia State Senator Richard Stuart to expand the death presumption to include brain injured workers who survived their accidents. This attempt failed when business interests contested the change in the law.

Copyright© 2009, Jerry Lutkenhaus. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT or Advertising Material under the Rules of Professional Conduct governing lawyers in Virginia. This note is designed for general information only. The information presented in this note should not be construed as legal advice.

I have been representing claimants in Virginia for over 30 years. In the July 1999 issue of Richmond Magazine I was rated one of the Best Workers' Compensation Lawyers in Central Virginia. In 2003 I received the "AV" rating from Martindale-Hubbell, its highest rating for lawyers. You can get more information from http://www.virginiadisabilitylawyer.com or http://www.geraldlutkenhaus.com


        Comments (0)


How to Value a Workers Compensation Claim? (a Virginia Lawyer's perspective)

Posted Friday, November 06, 2009 (1 day 22 hours ago.) Viewed 3 times.

You are injured at work and you are unable to return to that job due to the injury. The insurance company contacts you and wants to "settle" your claim. You wonder what a reasonable value is for your claim? These are some of the factors you need to consider in Virginia. Other states will differ since each state has a slightly different compensation system.

If your claim has been accepted by the insurance company you should be receiving weekly compensation benefits and medical coverage. In Virginia the maximum compensation you can receive is as of July 1, 2009 is $895.00 per week. Your individual compensation rate would be two thirds of your average weekly salary not to exceed $895.00 per week. Thus, if you making only $1,000.00 a week your compensation rate would only be $666.67 per week. In Virginia once you have an award you also are entitled to lifetime compensation for this injury.

If you are unable to return to work, then in Virginia you could receive weekly compensation for up to 500 weeks. In certain rare instances such as a brain injury or the loss of two extremities, you can receive lifetime compensation benefits.

However, if you are unable to return to your pre-injury job but can do light duty work, the insurance company will make a strenuous effort to place you in some form of light duty employment. If the placement is successful, then the insurance company can reduce the compensation it is paying you due to the fact you are receiving a light duty salary. Of course, if the light duty salary equals or exceeds your pre-injury salary, then the insurance company no longer has to pay weekly compensation.

Virginia will provide compensation for a permanent injury to an extremity or hearing or vision. However, you cannot receive this type of compensation if you are still out completely on weekly compensation benefits.

Very importantly there may be a need for future prescriptions, doctor's visits, additional medical operations, etc. Since a Virginia award means you have lifetime coverage for this injury, the costs of future medical care may well exceed the costs of weekly compensation payments.

With the above in mind, then the value of the claim is determined by (1) the salary and compensation rate; (2) the number of weeks of potential compensation remaining; (3) the inability to return to any form of work; (4) the ability to return to some form of light duty work and the availability of such work; (5) if there is a return to light duty work, the payment rate of such light duty work; (6) permanent injuries to any extremity or hearing or vision; and (7) the projection of future medical bills.

The valuation can be complex and it is advisable that a claimant seek the advice of an experienced workers' compensation attorney regarding a proper valuation before you reach that final "settlement" with the insurance company.

This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT or Advertising Material under the Rules of Professional Conduct governing lawyers in Virginia. This note is designed for general information only. The information presented in this note should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

I have been representing claimants in Virginia for over 30 years. In the July 1999 issue of Richmond Magazine I was rated one of the Best Workers' Compensation Lawyers in Central Virginia. In 2003 I received the "AV" rating from Martindale-Hubbell, its highest rating for lawyers.You can get more information from http://www.virginiadisabilitylawyer.com or http://www.geraldlutkenhaus.com


        Comments (0)


Effort fails to change Virginias Workers Compensation Death Presumption Law

Posted Monday, August 17, 2009 (82 days 22 hours ago.) Viewed 8 times.

Virginia has a rather peculiar workers compensation law. If the worker is found dead at the scene of his/her accident, the worker's accident is "presumed" to have arisen out of his work. However, if the worker lives for even a few minutes after his/her accident, then the worker does not receive this death presumption. Then, the worker's dependents can be denied benefits unless there is some other evidence proving how the accident occurred. This of course can be difficult since the best witness is dead.

This can work a real injustice. The worker who dies or loses consciousness as the result of an accident often cannot testify regarding the cause of his accident. Many years ago the Virginia Supreme Court decided to apply a presumption in death cases. This presumption meant if the worker was found dead at the scene of his/her accident it would be "presumed" the accident arose out of his/her work.

In a recent September 2006 case, a worker named Pierce was found unconscious at the scene of his accident. He lived for some months after his accident in a coma but remained comatose. Pierce had over $1,000,000.00 in medical bills. Pierce's widow asked the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission to apply the death presumption to Pierce's case. The Commission declined stating:

"Case law is clear that the death presumption does not apply where the claimant is not found dead at the scene of the accident but rather dies subsequently. The fact that the defendants have stipulated that Mr. Pierce's death was a direct result of his workplace injuries does not alter the claimant's burden of proof requiring that he establish the initial injury as compensable."

In another case, a worker was injured in a motor vehicle accident but lived for 35 minutes. The Commission again refused to apply the presumption and claimant lost because the accident was unexplainable.

An attempt was made in the Virginia Legislature to change the law as a result of the Pierce case. In the 2008-2009 General Assembly a bill was introduced by Virginia State Senator Richard Stuart to expand the death presumption to include brain injured workers who survived their accidents. This attempt failed when business interests contested the change in the law. As a result injured workers in Virginia are still at risk if they cannot recall their accidents or if they die shortly after their accidents.

This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT or Advertising Material under the Rules of Professional Conduct governing lawyers in Virginia. This note is designed for general information only. The information presented in this note should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

I have been representing claimants in Virginia for over 30 years. In the July 1999 issue of Richmond Magazine I was rated one of the Best Workers' Compensation Lawyers in Central Virginia. In 2003 I received the "AV" rating from Martindale-Hubbell, its highest rating for lawyers.You can get more information from http://www.virginiadisabilitylawyer.com or http://www.geraldlutkenhaus.com


        Comments (0)


Impaired by a Stroke: Is Social Security Disability Available for this?

Posted Friday, May 23, 2008 (1 year 169 days ago.) Viewed 246 times.

A stroke can result in a serious impairment. However, it is not necessarily disabling. Social Security has a strict set of guidelines regarding strokes. Social Security will consider your remaining functional capacity for work after your stroke.

1. Your age can be a very important factor. If you are under age 50 and can still do some form of work such as clerical work then your stroke  will probably not entitle you to benefits.

2. Your age can work in your favor. If you are over 55 with only a high school education and a past history of manual labor, then you would have a very good case for disability if your stroke now prevents you from doing manual labor. Social Security says in order to do Light Duty Work you must be able to stand and walk six hours out of an eight hour work day.  If this function is now impaired and you are over 55, you may have a strong case for disability.

3. Your past work experience is an important factor. As noted above, a past history of only manual labor can make your case for disability much easier with a stroke. This is especially true with a stroke if it means you have some partial paralysis that prevents manual labor.

4. Conversely, a past history of only clerical work may mean you can easily return to that type of work despite your stroke. This is so because clerical work is usual considered very light work or sedentary work.

5. The skill level of your past work is also important. As a general rule the more skills you possess the more difficult it is going to be to obtain disability benefits. This is so because a skilled worker can transfer his/her skills to many different occupations many of which may be light enough to do even after a stroke. A professional can still do his work behind a desk even though he now has to use a cane due to the stroke. However, if his speech is impaired by the stroke then perhaps he cannot do his former work.

6. When it comes to a stroke, an opinion from a neurologist  regarding one ‘s functional abilities can be decisive in a disability case. But a simple statement that one is "disabled" is not enough. It is better if the physician prepares a comprehensive statement describing how one's abilities to lift, walk, sit, etc. are compromised by the patient's stroke. In my cases I almost always have a Stroke Functional Evaluation completed by the treating neurologist or if one is not available then the claimant's primary treating physician will have to do the report.

7. The neurological  impairment listings are found at 11.04 of Social Security's Listing of Impairments. If a neurologist  says your impairment meets or equals one of these listings then your case for disability will be very strong.

8. An important measure of your remaining functional ability is any paralysis due to the stroke. A neurologist can measure your remaining functional capacity after the stroke.  An important factor is whether or not you need a cane or a walker to walk.

If you are denied on your initial application, you should consult an attorney who specializes in Social Security Disability. You can review my other article on "How to Find the Best Virginia Social Disability Lawyer" for some tips on finding an experienced Social Security Disability attorney.

This may be considered AN ADVERTISEMENT or Advertising Material under the Rules of Professional Conduct governing lawyers in Virginia. This note is designed for general information only. The information presented in this note should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
 
I have been representing claimants in Virginia for over 30 years. In the July 1999 issue of Richmond Magazine I was rated one of the Best Workers' Compensation Lawyers in Central Virginia. In 2003 I received the "AV" rating from Martindale-Hubbell, its highest rating for lawyers.You can get more information from http://www.virginiadisabilitylawyer.com or http://www.geraldlutkenhaus.com

        Comments (0)


 


Archives:

November 2009
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
« Oct
   


All Posts by jervalaw

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company