Writers' Community!

Search:

Writers' Community!

SearchWarp Home Submit An Article Frequently Asked Questions Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,255 Authors
44,609 Quality Articles
& 4,667 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Dan Bimrose (1,772)
Robert Melaccio, Sr. (4,558)
Sandra E. Graham (2,091)
Susan Thom (8,103)
Aaron Taylor (415)
Jared Wilson (3,839)
April Lorier (5,781)
Jeff Brown (4,695)
Michelle Mackin (9,112)
Krystal Kuehn (105)
Teresa Ortiz (5,740)
Terry Mitchell (1,408)
Ben Jones (4,858)
Judge Dred (602)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Natural Crystalline Gold Specimens

Application Services Provision Model

Future Cities Will Move And Change Shape

The Sky Is Falling - Things That Have Dropped In Unannounced

A History of Magnets And Their Many Uses

Is Astrology A True Science Part II

Shoot Video Underwater with Water Resistant Video Cameras

Solar Powered Chargers – Eco Friendly Charging!

Electronic Language Translators and How They Work

Wireless Keyboards – Using the Power of Radio Frequencies

Home » Categories » Science & Technology » Other Science & Technology » Interlace vs Progressive Scan: What's the Difference? » Printer Friendly

Interlace vs Progressive Scan: What's the Difference?

Rated 4 out of 5
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Mitchell Medford
Submitted Wednesday, October 19, 2005
Submitted by: Mitchell Medford (1,596) Unverified Account
http://www.newtechnologytv.com
Log in to become a member of Mitchell Medford's Fan Club!


Interlaced scanning

Interlaced scan-based images use techniques developed for CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) TV monitor displays, made up of 576 visible horizontal lines across a standard TV screen. Interlacing divides these into odd and even lines and then alternately refreshes them at 30 frames per second. The slight delay between odd and even line refreshes creates some distortion or 'jaggedness'. This is because only half the lines keep up with the moving image while the other half waits to be refreshed.

Interlaced scanning has served the analog camera, television and VHS video world very well for many years, and is still the most suitable for certain applications. However, now that display technology is changing with the advent of Liquid Crystal Display (LCD), Thin Film Transistor (TFT)-based monitors, DVDs and digital cameras, an alternative method of bringing the image to the screen, known as progressive scanning, has been created.

There are two dominant interlaced scan systems used in the world today: NTSC and PAL.

NTSC is based on a 525-line, 60 fields/30 frames-per-second at 60Hz system for transmission and display of video images. This is an interlaced system in which each frame is scanned in two fields of 262 lines, which is then combined to display a frame of video with 525 scan lines. NTSC is the official analog video standard in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, some parts of Central and South America, Japan, Taiwan, and Korea.

PAL is the dominant format in the World for analog television broadcasting and video display and is based on a 625 line, 50 field/25 frames a second, 50HZ system. The signal is interlaced, like NTSC, into two fields, composed of 312 lines each. Several distinguishing features are one: A better overall picture than NTSC because of the increased amount of scan lines. Two: Since color was part of the standard from the beginning, color consistency between stations and TVs are much better. In addition, PAL has a frame rate closer to that of film. PAL has 25 frames per second rate, while film has a frame rate of 24 frames per second. Countries on the PAL system include the U.K., Germany, Spain, Portugal, Italy, China, India, most of Africa, and the Middle East.

Progressive scanning

Progressive scan differs from interlaced scan in that the image is displayed on a screen by scanning each line (or row of pixels) in a sequential order rather than an alternate order, as is done with interlaced scan. In other words, in progressive scan, the image lines (or pixel rows) are scanned in numerical order (1,2,3) down the screen from top to bottom, instead of in an alternate order (lines or rows 1,3,5, etc... followed by lines or rows 2,4,6). By progressively scanning the image onto a screen every 60th of a second rather than "interlacing" alternate lines every 30th of a second, a smoother, more detailed, image can be produced on the screen that is perfectly suited for viewing fine details, such as text, and is also less susceptible to interlace flicker. The primary intent of progressive scan is to refresh the screen more often.

Conversion of interlaced to progressive scan:

Converting interlaced to progressive scan requires different processing compared with line doubling just to increase the number of scan lines per frame for large screens. To convert to progressive scan and preserve both detail and fullness, material from two consecutive fields should be combined for "stationary" subject matter. For "moving" subject matter a needed portion of an even line should be a blend of the odd lines immediately before and after, and vice versa.

A bit of history:

Up until the late 1980's, flicker on computer screens was very noticeable since single scan line details made up a much larger portion of screen content. Also with memory as a limiting factor, consumer PC's only had about 240 scan lines of picture information which incidentally hid most of the flicker. The "regular VGA" standard was based on NTSC, exactly twice the scan rate using the same 525 scan lines per frame and progressive scan, with 480 scan lines holding the picture and with up to 640 details on a scan line.

As larger TV screens were developed, more viewers started noticing the flicker due to the fading phosphors when the electron beam visited any given spot on the screen only once every 1/30'th of a second. When you "see the scan lines" you are really seeing the even gaps between the odd scan lines or vice versa, as the phosphors fade between refreshes. On small screens in the early days of TV, the electron beam was thicker than 1/480’th the screen height so these gaps were not as noticeable.

------------------------------------

Mitchell Medford is a popular reviewer of consumer electronics and technology and has served as a product development consultant for several consumer electronics manufacturers. Visit his site or more information on Plasma TV, HDTVs, and DVRs.



Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Mitchell Medford's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by gabberdim from Greece (311 days 8 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
tnks for the info ! Great work.
Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 7,188 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Wednesday, October 19, 2005
View other articles written by Mitchell Medford (1,596) Unverified Account


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Interlace vs Progressive Scan: What's the Difference?

How to Point a TV Satellite Dish

Types of Digital Printing machines

Microsoft's Monopoly on Operating Systems

Latest Technology Invention: Archimedes May Be Back!

Frequency Induced Antigravity

The history of camcorders

Digital nail art printer now paints onto toenails

Advanced DC Motor Technologies for Miniature Diaphragm Pumps

Metal Detecting - Understanding the Technology Is Important

Home  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company