Writers' Community!
Home News Business Science & Technology Life
Front Page Page Two Columnists Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,559 Authors
48,454 Quality Articles
& 7,107 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Alf Gordon (1,365)
Nicole Beurkens (148)
Jeff Brown (7,977)
David Tanguay (7,555)
Ira Coffin (897)
Joel Hendon (4,850)
Terry Mitchell (2,785)
Rob Lafferty (123)
Arlene Wright-Correll (10,108)
Jane Bullard (1,959)
Robert Melaccio, Sr. (6,499)
Avis Ward (13,445)
Richard Nicastro (2,545)
Dianne Lehmann (3,112)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Global Warming Is Coming

Clear Skies No Aircraft Contrails in the future?

Using Rocks as CO2 Sponges

Protecting Wires, Cables and Pipes From Animals Without Harming Them

Why Dont They Recycle?

Green Living Tips

Why the Bees are Dying

It Is Not Easy Being Green

Hot Food News-Why are bees disappearing?

5 Renewable Energy Alternatives to Fossil Fuels

Home » Categories » Science & Technology » Environment » Global Warming True Or False? » Printer Friendly

Global Warming True Or False?

Rated 3.5 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Bob Smith
Submitted Saturday, August 25, 2007
Bob Smith (161)

Log in to become a member of Bob Smith's Fan Club!


Global warming, now there are two buzz words guaranteed to start a debate any time they are mentioned around the old water cooler! Ask any group of people what they think of it, and you will get everything from: ‘Its the end of the world!’ to: ‘Its a left wing hoax designed to destroy our economy!’ So, let us look at just what the facts are.

Global warming was first observed (as hard as this may be to believe!) way back in 1896. In that year, a Swedish chemist named Svante Arrhenius was the first person to quantify just how much the world is warmed by carbon dioxide. In his report, he warned that the world was ‘evaporating our coal mines into the air.’ He was largely ignored.

Then, in 1979, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences issued a report that rising carbon dioxide levels could cause temperatures to rises, and warned that a ‘wait and see attitude’ could be dangerous. Unfortunately, the naysayers in all this are a very powerful group: oil, coal, gas, automotive and steel. All industries that create vast amounts of the greenhouse gases, and all with very deep pockets. Since the late 1980s, they have funded a whole host of lobbying groups like the Global Climate Coalition, and the Information Council on the Environment, specifically to downplay the danger or deny it outright.

On top of that, there is the problem that this issue is not something one nation can address alone. Recently, in the State of California, Governor Schwarzenegger signed an executive order with the goal of reducing car emissions ten percent by 2020. While quite the laudable effort, it will accomplish nothing! China and India are poised to become highly industrialized counties, meaning: more cars, more power plants, more greenhouse gases being vented into the atmosphere. And thats just two nations. What of the rest of the world? It was because of the global nature of the problem that the Rio Treaty on voluntary emission reductions was signed in 1992, and later the Kyoto Treaty was negotiated. However, while President George H.W. Bush signed the Rio Treaty, its mandates were never enacted; and, under pressure from lobbying groups, President George Bush did not sign the Kyoto treaty.

In recent years weve seen the effects of Global Warming: killer heat waves in America and Europe, wilted crops, smaller snow packs and receding glaciers, and bigger and stronger hurricanes. So, we must ask ourselves: who are we to believe? There are thousands of scientists around the world, from all manner of political and social backgrounds who agree that global warming is happening. And then there are the naysayers, all of whom are backed by industries that have a vested interest in preventing any actions that would endanger their profits. Which ones are impartial, do you think?






Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Bob Smith's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by secret33 (1 year 85 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
Global warming is a serious threat to life on earth but it is being blown out of proportion for the sole reason to raise funding which usually is embezzled and squandered.
Respond to this comment

» left by Jordan (1 year 76 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 3 out of 5
Global Warming is a serious issue, affecting all walks of life on Earth. CO2 emissions are more massive than ever, and if we don't do something about this now, life on earth will be very hard for future generations. I'm 15-years-old and very involved with this issue. I'm writing an expository[informative] essay on the issue for Speech and Debate. How are people's careers affected by Global Warming?
Respond to this comment

» left by Joel Hendon (4,850)
Joel Hendon
(267 days 7 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
Bob, when Svante made his statement there were approximately 1.5 billion people living on this earth. Today there are over 6.6 billion. More than quadrupled. Naturally there are more CO2 emissions. All those humans and animals both domestic and wild, pass enough gas to raise that level. The implications of man made global warming could not be stopped if they were true. And all the scientists who are yelling the sky is falling, admit it. Besides, carbon dioxide particles are NOT the main heat sinks in our atmosphere. Water vapor particles are. We might try covering the oceans with plastic sheetings (it would be cheaper than what is being proposed.

And people are daydreaming if they think they can slow China and India's industrial growth.
What people better do is get their heads on straight and start working towards a sensible solution to areas of concentrated lower level air polution.

Also, your article stopped short of the latest findings. There is every evidence that Al Gore can return his portion of the Nobel prize. The ice you refer to as receding, is back, and there has been no measurable increase in the atmospheric temperature in two years now.

And you say that the naysayers are backed by industries that have a vested interest in preventing any actions that would endanger their profits. The opposite is true. Those pushing this agenda are those who are shoveling in millions of grant monies.


Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 771 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Saturday, August 25, 2007
View other articles written by Bob Smith (161)


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Limestone information and facts

Global Warming- How are Animals Affected by Global Warming

Growing Plants with LEDs

Christians and Environment – Can Christian Beliefs Inspire a Believer to Help Saving the Planet?

Centrifugal Chillers

The Facts About Hybrid Car Emissions and Global Warming

How To Make Water From Air

Polar Bears in Trouble - Endangered?

Wind Farms – Limitations as Energy Platforms

Basic Marble Information and Facts

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company