Most government officials throughout the world like to boast about their nations elections. It makes good press and besides, its patriotic. Nonetheless, in the last seven years the U.S. has relinquished its legendary role as the guardians of democracy and free elections. Today, the peoples of struggling democracies around the world are looking elsewhere for trustworthy allies in their quest for freedom. One must wonder if voters in America have lost hope with the two party system.
With our recent history of irregular voting methods, the Supreme Courts appointment of George Bush Jr. and the unreliable voting counts from Florida and Ohio, it is more than a formidable challenge to impress the world with our election process. When the Electoral College trumped the majority rule in 2000, it only exacerbated an already dubious system. Notwithstanding these blemishes on the face of a failing democracy, many of us prefer to deny reality. I think that is understandable, as well as potentially threatening.
With the Presidential Election of 2008 approaching, some Americans are seduced by a false sense of power. Politicians are polishing their shoes, mingling with the commoners, revising their rsums, and pretending that the needs of their constituents are foremost in their minds. Once again, the season is upon on us. Many of us find their maneuvering and hypocrisy intolerable; and I am one of them.
Choosing individuals to fill the offices of government in the executive, judiciary, and legislative branches briefly imbues the electorate with a sense of power. From servants to masters we, the governed, can at last appear to become the legitimate source of power, though fleeting and impotent as it may be. The act of voting ascribes a righteous image to both the ruling class and its subjects. Despite all the pomp and circumstance, as subjects of the state we can at least pretend to be the employers of those who fail to represent us. This is our time. We become the great deciders.
Since the 1960s, there has been a trend of decreasing voter turnout. In recent decades, voting has declined to about 50% of the voting age population in presidential elections and less for midterm elections. Barring poor weather, lack of transportation, epidemic obesity, and other health restrictions, poor turnout can only be the result of disenchantment, indifference, or contentment. Most civic-minded people, however, consider low turnout undesirable. Unfortunately, some prefer fostering indifference, disenchantment, and division among the electorate. For these sycophants and scrooges, awareness and education are their greatest enemies.
The big question remains: Why vote? After they are elected, they will just go on with business as usual. All their campaign promises will swiftly fade away, as always. Is this not the sentiment of most Americans?
Our state always votes the Republican ticket; so what good is my vote? My 19-year-old son uttered those words just the other day. Regardless of party affliction -- or affiliation, who hasnt thought that also?
Special interest groups own the politicians anyway. He added after informing me that he would not be voting. While his remarks are logically sound, do they justify forfeiting his right to vote altogether?
One can certainly make a good argument either way. With the Electoral College in the United States, the chance of any one vote influencing the outcome is extremely low. The looming question remains; why would any rational person waste time voting in America?
Applying game theory studies, the ability for voters to interact with the final outcome of an election is highly unlikely. Here is a basic formula for predicting voter turnout: CA + M > S.
C is the chance that a persons vote will affect an outcome, and A is the perceived advantage of that person's preferred candidate or political party winning. M is the moral obligation; the civic duty one contributes to their society. Though in recent years, this moral obligation has been supplanted by personal gratification. S is the sacrifice; the time, effort, and frustration involved. In most elections, since C (chance) is virtually zero, CA is also near zero. M is thus the most significant variable in motivating people to vote. For a person to cast their ballot, these factors ( CA+M ) must outweigh S .
Political Scientists, Riker and Retook, developed a detailed explanation of M. They identified five major sources of gratification that people receive for voting. Conforming to the social obligation to vote is the first. The second is asserting one's allegiance to the political system. Affirming a partisan preference or voting for a candidate to reflect their support, but not to achieve any outcome is the third. The fourth is about hope; wanting to believe one's relevance and importance in the political system actually matters. Lastly, the fifth group is a mixture of hardcore gamblers and compulsive shoppers; those who find the process of making an informed decision stimulating.
Though some political scientists contest Riker and Ordeshook's conclusions, to discover exactly why people choose to vote is a perplexing challenge and their theories seem plausible to me.
Choosing a candidate that evolves from our dysfunctional two-party system is not a promising prospect for most of us, yet the penalties of not voting may prove to be even more egregious. One stiff look at history should provide enough consternation to anyone, who is planning to abstain from voting.
The prospect of restoring democracy depends on the people who believe that their personal influence, however small, needs to be asserted. This is the M in the equation, as I see it. Do we not have an obligation to others and to the future of our childrens children? Do we care enough about the society of our fellow Americans to show up at the polls on election day?
Altruism is the last hope of a failing democracy. Without it, there is no reason to cast a vote, especially when the choice is between the lesser of two evils. With this in mind, I have come to my own conclusion; one that I hope the majority of Americans will adopt before next November. Vote anyway!
Every man must decide whether he will walk in the light of creative altruism or in the darkness of destructive selfishness.
Disclaimer: All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any
information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional
or organization.
