Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 7,763 Authors
70,427 Quality Articles
& 5,918 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Joel Hendon (16,285)
Ben Morrish (7,936)
Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Sandra E. Graham (7,883)
Fran Larson (2,271)
Shari Vaudo (418)
David Tanguay (9,577)
Michael Ramzy (633)
Missing Link (766)
E. Raymond Rock (3,068)
Gregory Lewis (1,603)
Nancy Daniels (1,550)
Mark Parsec (15,056)
David Pekrul (3,696)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
The Voting Season in the Rearview Mirror

McCain: A Man of Class, Even in Defeat.

The Anti-Incumbency Movement Is Dead

A Monday Morning Quarterback's Postmortem of the Election Season

The American Ideal: Out Of Many, One

Road Map to the White House: Four Steps to How Obama Won

THe First Lady of These United States of America

The Searchwarp Post-Election Challenge

Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . .

A Sneak Peak at Two Americas with the 2008 Presidential Election

Home » Categories » Government » Voting / Electoral Process » What the Iowa Results Really Mean » Printer Friendly

Terry Mitchell

What the Iowa Results Really Mean

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Terry Mitchell
Submitted Friday, January 04, 2008
Terry Mitchell (4,981)
Terry Mitchell

http://commenterry.blogs.com
Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!


Now that the Iowa Caucuses are over, what do the results really mean anyway?

For the Democrats, Barack Obama's big win takes away Hillary Clinton's air of inevitability and gives him a head of steam going into New Hampshire. More than likely, he will shoot to the top of the polls in New Hampshire over the weekend and Clinton might not have a chance to stem the tide before Tuesday's primary. If Obama could get a win in New Hampshire, another overwhelmingly-white state, it would almost certainly lead to a win in South Carolina, where African-Americans make up approximately half of Democratic primary voters. This is a scenario that Clinton has feared for months.

Hillary Clinton's third-place finish is certainly a blow to her campaign, but hardly a mortal one. Finishing third in Iowa is not a deathblow. Twenty years ago, both George H. W. Bush and Mike Dukakis recovered from third-place Iowa finishes to win their respective party's nomination. History could well repeat itself for Clinton and John McCain this year. In addition, Clinton still has a big lead nationally and in many of the large Super Tuesday states. However, those leads will evaporate if she continues to allow Obama to beat her in the early primaries and caucuses. At some point before Super Tuesday, she's going to have to stop him and regain her footing -- and the sooner the better for her. Look for her to put up a knock-down-drag-out battle with him in New Hampshire to try to nip his momentum in the bud. If she fails, her campaign could start to prematurely unravel.

John Edwards didn't get the win he desperately needed in Iowa, but he did manage to finish ahead of Clinton. He will stay around to compete in New Hampshire, although he is running low on resources after spending most of them in Iowa. However, as was the case four years (when he also finished second in Iowa), he will not likely do well in New Hampshire. If that ultimately proves to be the case, he'll probably be forced to drop out shortly thereafter.

Joe Biden, Chris Dodd, and Mike Gravel have already seen the handwriting on the wall and have dropped out. Look for Bill Richardson to soon follow suit. Dennis Kucinich will likely stay around indefinitely, but he's just along for the ride.

For the Republicans, Mike Huckabee's win legitimizes his heretofore-shoestring campaign and will likely start bringing him the money he's deperately needed. Whether the new influx of cash will come quickly enough to allow him to compete in the larger states down the road remains to be seen. Huckabee overcame a barrage of negative ads by Mitt Romey, who outspent him nearly 15 to one. He will get a bounce in New Hampshire but will not likely win it. New Hampshire seems a bit too libertarian for the likes of an evangelical like Huckabee. However, he still has a decent shot at a respectable third-place finish there. Look for him to zero in on South Carolina, a place that appears to be fertile ground for what he hopes to be his next big win and where his Iowa victory will solidify the already substantial lead he enjoys in the polls.

Mitt Romney's less-than-impressive second-place finish deals a devastating blow to his campaign, despite all his spin about getting the "silver medal." He had spent far more time and money in Iowa than any other GOP candidate but got little to show for it. He will now have five days to fight for his political life in New Hampshire. If he loses there, he's done. Look for Romney to pull out all the stops to try to bring John McCain down. Even if he is successful, it may backfire on him and ultimately benefit someone else -- like Huckabee.

McCain wanted three things last night and got two of them. What he wanted more than anything else was the Huckabee victory over Romney. Another thing he wanted was a third-place finish for himself and he pretty much got that, albeit a virtual tie with Fred Thompson. What he didn't get was an Obama loss. Obama's win means that he, along with Ron Paul, will be able to siphon independent voters away from McCain in New Hampshire. McCain relied heavily on independent voters for his 2000 victory there over George W. Bush. However, because of Romney's loss in Iowa, McCain will now likely be a heavy favorite to win New Hampshire.

Fred Thompson needed two things last night and got neither of them. First, he really needed a Huckabee loss. Huckabee is his main rival for southern, socially-conservative voters. Huckabee's victory now deprives Thompson of a chance to use the southern primaries as a means of making a comeback. The other thing he needed was a solid third-place finish. A tie with McCain won't cut it. Look for Thompson to pull out soon after New Hampshire. 

Ron Paul, with his impressive 10% showing, will continue on indefinitely while Rudy Giuliani will compete in New Hampshire but still mainly focus on Florida's January 29th primary. Giuliani's fate will likely not be decided until then, unless Huckabee or McCain were to become unstoppable beforehand. Duncan Hunter will probably drop out soon.


Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, amateur political analyst, and blogger from Virginia, USA. He posts a least one article a day to his blog - http://commenterry.blogs.com - on subjects such as current events, politics, technology, society and culture, religion, health and well-being, self improvement, personal finance, trivia, and sports.
 
You can now have any article and blog post he writes – in advance, if you would like – for use in your book, newspaper, magazine, ezine, newsletter, website, or whatever!! This includes the thousands of articles and blog posts he's previously written. Contact him via this website or his blog for details.   






Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Robert Melaccio, Sr. (5,205)
Robert Melaccio, Sr.
(1 year 286 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Terry, I enjoy reading your work. We do differ on some things but that is life, but I was wondering, just who are you voting for and why? I've spoken to who I am but can you tell me and perhaps us what these candidates have said that would make anyone vote for them. Better yet, lets put aside their rhetoric and talk and focus on their works and deeds and substantiated deeds at that? can you write to that and embellish who you think you might select and why? I certainly like what Edwards says and for the most part some others but I do have a big lump when it comes to immigration [oh sorry] illegal workers. I forgot and must have been brainwashed. All the best and keep writing RTM
Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (4,681)
Terry Mitchell
(1 year 286 days ago.)

Robert, thanks for reading and commenting on my articles. I try to write these types of articles from a impartial, non-partison perspective -- you know, like the media is supposed to but doesn't. I try to focus mainly on the horse race without getting into the issues.

However, I do have opinions, as you can see from my commentary-style articles. Since you asked me, I will tell you that I like only two of the candidates -- Mike Huckabee and Ron Paul. I would not consider any of the rest. All of the Democrats are too liberal for me. By liberal I mean they believe in a big, paternalistic government that tries to do for people what they can do for themselves. I also don't like their pro-abortion stance and their support for the militant gay lobby's agenda. But I also don't like the pro-war neocons in the Republican party. I'm pretty much a libertarian, but I also like candidates like Huckabee, who are not afraid to wear their religion on their sleeves. These are the kind of candidates that drive the elitists and religiphobics crazy. More power to them!

By the way, to see a more comprehensive treatise of my personal politics, see the following links: http://commenterry.blogs.com/commenterry/2007/02/a_viewpoint_not.html
http://commenterry.blogs.com/about.html
Respond to this comment

» left by Lorrie Davids (7,797)
Lorrie Davids
(1 year 285 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
OK, Terry, where is your analysis of the NH Debate? You have become one of my favorite political commentators. I was hoping you were TiVo-ing the dems and would have "part one" of the debate waiting for my perusal last night. Thanks for sharing your insight with us.
Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (4,681)
Terry Mitchell
(1 year 285 days ago.)

LM, altough I watch every debate carefully, I generally avoid commenting on them. Debate "results" are just so subjective. I like to stick to the actually voting. I will say that I think Obama did a good job of blowing off Hillary's attacks last night, whereas Mitt didn't do so well defending himself against McCain, Huckabee, Thompson, and Giuliani. I'm really looking forward to that GOP debate on Fox tonight. It's going to be a real knock-down-drag-out affair and Mitt better be ready this time or he'll soon be toast.

On Tuesday, I'll post a "what to look for" article about the New Hampshire Primary and then another "what the results mean" article on Wednesday. Thanks for reading my articles. I'm glad you enjoy them.
Respond to this comment

» left by Avis Ward (12,889)
Avis Ward
(1 year 285 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
I also enjoy your commentaries but have never told you so. Now you know. I am told I could be a politician and didn't know if I should have been offended or was complimented. Seeing the glass half fool, perhaps both? I do not get into discussions about politics as I tend to be private about my political stances. I admire political analysts and always look forward to what you have to say. I don't look for agreement but your analysis of what's happening during the campaign season and afterwards. Thank you for trying to be non-biased. I think you do a fantastic job!
Respond to this comment

» left by Avis Ward (12,889)
Avis Ward
(1 year 285 days ago.)

Avis Ward again. I'm laughing as that was a Freudian slip or typo?!? "Seeing the glass half 'empty' not 'fool'! Happy New Year!
Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (4,681)
Terry Mitchell
(1 year 285 days ago.)

Avis, thanks for reading my articles. I'm glad you enjoy them. I'll try to keep more of them coming throughout the campaign season. I've always fantasized about being a real political analyst. By the way, for everyone who enjoys my articles, you can find much more on my personal blog by clicking on the "Politics" tab on the right side. Some of it is poltical analysis which other stuff is politcal opinion. I try to keep analysis and opinion in separate articles. It should be fairly easy to tell which is which.
Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 997 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 1/4/2008 8:24:39 AM.
View other articles written by Terry Mitchell (4,981)
Terry Mitchell


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Why Should I Vote? The Pros and Cons of Voting

Super Delegates vs. Electoral College

Campaign Fund Raising Follies

"Hail to the Chief": How to Watch This Week's Presidential Debate

Could This Be Bye-Bye Obama

Don't It Make My Red States Blue

The Searchwarp Post-Election Challenge

Mike Huckabee's Plan B

Choosing A Candidate

What the Iowa Results Really Mean

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.047.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company