Writers' Community!
Home News Business Science & Technology Life Style
Front Page Page Two Columnists Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,636 Authors
48,646 Quality Articles
& 5,994 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Patricia Johnson is a fan of:
Richard Walrath (150)
Most Recent
Military Christmas - How You Can Help Those Overseas

Army Morale, Welfare, & Recreation

Military Care Package - How to Help a Soldier Abroad

Wall Street Bailout Won't Cut the Cost of Fighting In Iraq

This Veteran's Day

"Lay Down my Burdens": Harriet Tubman and Meta Grimball Tell Us about the Civil War

New Naval Base off of North Venezuela.

So They Want To Use Tribes To Bing Law and Order.

Peace Lover or Just a Fricken Chicken

“The Purple Heart Battalion” - A Brief History of the 442nd RCT

Home » Categories » Government » Military / Armed Forces » Plans to Increase Army's Strength by 74,200 » Reprint Rights » Printer Friendly

Plans to Increase Army's Strength by 74,200

Rated 3 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Patricia Johnson
Submitted Monday, January 07, 2008
Patricia Johnson (335)
Articles and Answers.com
Log in to become a member of Patricia Johnson's Fan Club!


President Bush requested an increase of 74,200 Army troops and the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) was published October 2007 indicating the Army preferred Alternative Three. The intent is to increase the Army's end strength from Fiscal Year 2008 through Fiscal Year 2013 "to a size and composition that is better able to meet national security and defense requirements".

The Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for Army Growth and Force Structure Realignment has now been posted in the Federal Register and provides readers with the following mailing address for submitting questions and comments:

Public Affairs Office

U.S. Army Environmental Command

Building E4460

Attention: IMAEPA

5179 Hoadley Road

Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 210105401
A copy of the ROD and Final PEIS my be viewed at http://www.aec.army.mil

Although only the mailing address is listed in the Federal Register, it appears this particular Public Affairs Office may also be contacted by the following means:

Email - PublicComments@aec.apgea.army.mil

PH: (410) 436-2556

FAX: (410) 436-1693

As indicated in the Federal Register

"The Army's preferred alternative identified in the Final PEIS is to implement Alternative 3. This alternative allows for full support of Army modularity initiatives by adding necessary CS Soldiers to the Army's Active and Reserve components while increasing the size of the Army by six BCTs"

CS is an acronym for Combat Support (refers to unit function) while BCT is an acronym for Brigade Combat Team, H or I BCT refers to Heavy or Infantry BCT

What we know, for fact, is the soldiers that are being sent to Afghanistan and Iraq are being sent on multiple tours; therefore it would seem reasonable to add additional combat troops to increase the end-strength of our Army.

The problem with adding troops is the fact they are either being blown to bits, and/or they are coming home with a host of medical and/or psychological needs that may eventually require treatment at a VA facility. As of 10:00 am EST on January 7, 2008, the Department of Defense is indicating 35,048 casualties for Iraq and Afghanistan. 4,378 dead and 30,670 wounded. The Afghanistan figures are only through December 29, 2007 so the actual toll will be higher.

My opposition to adding more troops is twofold; first I believe in negotiation, not war. Second, my husband is a former combat veteran and receives treatment at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. If they are not already receiving VA care, sooner or later many of the 35,048 casualties, and additional troops that are service connected for medical and/or psychological problems, are going to require care at a VA facility and here is an example of what they might run into...

My husband received a letter from the VA asking him to call to schedule an appointment in the Endocrine clinic, my husband is service connected for Diabetes Mellitus caused by exposure to the herbicide Agent Orange and is seen on a fairly regular basis due to the numerous medical problems caused by Diabetes.

I called the number listed on the letter and after being put on hold for 9 minutes, I hung up and called the main number and was transferred to the clinic extension where I waited on hold for an additional 11 minutes. After a period of twenty minutes I was finally able to schedule an appointment, for next month. Remember, I was calling because the VA sent a letter requesting a call.

What is going to happen to the troops that don't get a letter requesting them to call? How long will they be put on hold? The majority of the brave men and women whose lives have been put in jeopardy over and over again, by this administration, are suffering from various stages of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder due to multiple combat tours.

Should they, along with the other approximate five million veterans the VA treats, have to wait 20 minutes just to schedule an appointment?

You are now in a position to provide commentary on adding 74,200 troops to our Army. Please take a few minutes to document your position on the subject by writing to the address listed above.

Patricia L Johnson is a former special assignment writer/photographer and co-owner of the Articles and Answers News and Information sites. Articles and Answers and Articles and Answers 2007




This author of this Article has choosen to make this article available with free reprint rights.
Click here to copy this article.

Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Patricia Johnson's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:
No comments yet.


Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 11 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Monday, January 07, 2008
View other articles written by Patricia Johnson (335)


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Wall Street Bailout Won't Cut the Cost of Fighting In Iraq

Green Berets Training Is Considered To Be One of the Toughest

Hidden History - Ireland's Nazi Past

Troop Support: Sending Care Packages to Military Personnel

How to Clean Your Civil War Uniform

What else the US Army should consider to retain soldiers within the total force

Americans Embarrassed by US Troops

- Why We Fight -

“The Purple Heart Battalion” - A Brief History of the 442nd RCT

The East Timor Defence Force "Petitioners"

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company