Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,714 Authors
48,406 Quality Articles
& 2,712 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Terry Mitchell is a fan of:
Jennifer Cuddy (1,528)
Avis Ward (9,854)
Kacycarr (51,006)
Jane Bullard (2,007)
Mogama (13,549)
Danny Davids (15,783)
Creative Blogger (7,385)
Sandra E. Graham (2,204)
Barbara Clark (440)
Asher Ricard (6,853)
James P Krehbiel (1,469)
Abigail Richards (6,168)
Lorrie Davids (5,447)
Aaron Taylor (1,017)
Marty RicKard (2,885)
Judge Dred (1,729)
Diane Dutton (50)
E. Raymond Rock (1,950)
Crystal O'Brien (247)
Mark Parsec (20,858)
Ryan Stroud (2,260)
Mark Randig (102)
Jean Horst (978)
Melinda McAlindon (732)
Most Recent
The Voting Season in the Rearview Mirror

McCain: A Man of Class, Even in Defeat.

The Anti-Incumbency Movement Is Dead

A Monday Morning Quarterback's Postmortem of the Election Season

The American Ideal: Out Of Many, One

Road Map to the White House: Four Steps to How Obama Won

THe First Lady of These United States of America

The Searchwarp Post-Election Challenge

Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . .

A Sneak Peak at Two Americas with the 2008 Presidential Election

Home » Categories » Government » Voting / Electoral Process » The Implications of the Michigan GOP Primary Results » Printer Friendly

Terry Mitchell

The Implications of the Michigan GOP Primary Results

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Terry Mitchell
Submitted Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Terry Mitchell (2,781)
Terry Mitchell

http://commenterry.blogs.com
Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!


The results of yesterday's GOP primary in Michigan have huge implications for the presidential race.

Mitt Romney's win means he has climbed back into the race as the third Republican candidate to win a major nominating contest. It also virtually assures that he will remain in the race indefinitely and that a GOP nominee will not emerge any sooner than Super Tuesday. Romney now has some of the momentum that had been eluding him before.

He had pulled his ads in Nevada and South Carolina to concentrate on Michigan but he will now put them back up. He is the only GOP candidate who has a great deal of organization in Nevada and is likely to win that state's caucuses on Saturday. He might well be competitive in South Carolina's primary that same day and in Florida's primary 10 days later. After that, he has the resources to compete in every Super Tuesday state if he wants to. No other Republican candidate has that option.

On Super Tuesday, he will be a prohibitive favorite in Massachusetts and Utah and will have a decent shot at winning states like California, Illinois, Missouri, Minnesota, Connecticut, Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Delaware, and Alaska. Not all of the states are winner-take-all, so he could pile up delegates even from states that he doesn't win. Remember that once Super Tuesday rolls around, the race will be all about delegates. Beyond that point, Romney could ultimately win the nomination through a long battle of attrition if no one else is able to nail it down first.

John McCain's loss means he was not able to carry his New Hampshire momentum into Michigan. Although McCain claims Romney's win should have been expected due to his "home field advantage," Michigan was a state that many felt McCain should have won. In fact, shortly after his New Hampshire victory, McCain himself predicted that he would win in Michigan. Eight years ago, Michigan was one of only a handful of states that McCain was able to win in his failed quest for the nomination.

If he is to win the nomination this time, he will create a rare situation in which a candidate loses a given state in a successful nomination that he won in an unsuccessful bid for the nomination. I can only think of one example in which this has happened before. In 1980, George H. W. Bush beat Ronald Reagan in Iowa, but Reagan ultimately won the nomination. However, Bush placed third in Iowa in 1988 but won the nomination that time.

In 2000, independent voters helped McCain win Michigan. They voted in his favor this time as well, but unfortunately for him, they didn't come out in the kind of numbers that they did in 2000. That had to be disappointing, as he was counting on a large number of independents voting Republican since the Democrats were conducting a meaningless primary. The lower number of independent voters voting Republican also highlighted McCain's weakness with Republican voters. In the 2008 contests conducted so far, he has failed to get a majority, or even a plurality, of those voters in any state -- even in New Hampshire, where he won. Going forward, this will be a problem for him unless he can turn those numbers around. Most of the states still to come have closed primaries and caucuses, which are open only to registered Republicans.

McCain got a rather large bounce in momentum coming off his win in New Hampshire. This created a very positive effect for him both in the South Carolina polls and in the national polls. It'll be interesting to see how much of this will now be negated by his disappointing Michigan loss.

Mike Huckabee had once hoped to be competitive in Michigan, but will settle for a distant third-place finish -- his second in a row after his big win in Iowa. Huckabee didn't spend a whole lot of time or resources in Michigan, as he is looking to South Carolina for his next big win. One consolation is that Romney won Michigan, likely slowing McCain's momentum going into South Carolina. Had McCain won, Huckabee's task of defeating him in South Carolina would have been much more difficult. McCain looks to be Huckabee's chief rival there, although Romney and Fred Thompson look to put up strong showings.

Huckabee is depending on a heavy turnout by evangelical Christians in South Carolina, where they are more numerous than they are in Michigan. He will need to keep a strong majority of them to himself. Should someone like Thompson lure a sizeable portion of them into his camp, it could dilute Huckabee's vote and throw South Carolina to McCain.

Once again, Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani finished at the back of the pack. However, Thompson is banking on South Carolina to pump life into his campaign. It will be put-up-or-shut-up time for him. Meanwhile, Giuliani is still staking his hopes on Florida.


Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, amateur political analyst, and blogger from Virginia, USA. He posts a least one article a day to his blog - http://commenterry.blogs.com - on subjects such as current events, politics, technology, society and culture, religion, health and well-being, self improvement, personal finance, trivia, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media. His articles here on SearchWarp represent only a small portion of his work. All of it can be found on his blog. If you like his articles, you'll love his blog.  





Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Danny Davids (15,783)
Danny Davids
(308 days 4 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4.5 out of 5
FYI Terry, I heard a radio ad last night from our Texas congressman Ron Paul, asking for votes to re-elect him. Since he's not currently President, I'm assuming the votes he wants are for his congressional seat. Is he out of the race, or is this his way of covering his backside in the unlikely (!) event he doesn't win the Presidential nomination?
Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (2,781)
Terry Mitchell
(308 days 3 hours ago.)

Danny, very interesting piece of info. Whatever chance Ron Paul had of capturing the GOP presidential nomination were dashed when scored only 8% of the vote in New Hampshire, the most libertarian state in the U.S. If he can't win there, where, pray tell, can he win? Of course, the more avid Ron Paul supporters and conspiracy theorists will say he is losing because the voting machines are "pre-set" and rigged against him. Obviously, Ron Paul himself knows he can't be elected President and is therefore planning to run for re-election to Congress. Hopefully, those voting machines in his district aren't rigged!
Respond to this comment

» left by Diane Dutton (50)
Diane Dutton
(307 days 5 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Excellent article Terry. I believe that I saw your crediblity as an analyst without bias from your poersonal opinion on the candidates. That is refreshing. Continue your pursuit since most political journalists can't write without interjecting personal opinion. Great Job!
Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (2,781)
Terry Mitchell
(307 days 2 hours ago.)

Diane, thanks for the kind words.
Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 407 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Wednesday, January 16, 2008
View other articles written by Terry Mitchell (2,781)
Terry Mitchell


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Our Forefathers Are Rolling In Their Graves

Campaign Fund Raising Follies

Why Should I Vote? The Pros and Cons of Voting

"Hail to the Chief": How to Watch This Week's Presidential Debate

Could This Be Bye-Bye Obama

Don't It Make My Red States Blue

The Searchwarp Post-Election Challenge

Mike Huckabee's Plan B

Choosing A Candidate

What the Iowa Results Really Mean

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company