Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,188 Authors
71,865 Quality Articles
& 5,588 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Edward Rhymes (7,667)
Brianna Popsickle (2,495)
Teresa Ortiz (10,864)
Julian Price (13,927)
Stephany Springer (41,578)
Abigail Richards (9,835)
E. Raymond Rock (3,120)
Terry Mitchell (5,410)
Mark Parsec (16,584)
Nenita Wells (1,718)
Ira Coffin (12,151)
Krystal Kuehn (1,183)
Michael Ramzy (705)
Sandra E. Graham (8,900)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Ten Enterprise Performance Management Best Practices - Executing Phase

11 Enterprise Performance Management Best Practices - Planning Phase

Eight Enterprise Performance Management Best Practices - Defining Phase

How to Develop a Performance Metrics Repository That Drives Organizational Success

Secrets of Developing Simple, Powerful Performance Measures That Drive Organizational Success

PRINCE2 Training Myths and Misconceptions

Project Managers, What's Your Competitive Advantage?

Protect Your Business from the Vishing scam

I Simply Do Not Get On With the Project Team Member

How to Apply Prince2 - The Organisation Component

Home » Categories » Business » Project Management » Project Management Training: Balanced Matrix Organization Structure » Printer Friendly

Daiv Russell

Project Management Training: Balanced Matrix Organization Structure

Rated 2.5 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Daiv Russell
Submitted Thursday, February 14, 2008
Daiv Russell (3,699)
Daiv Russell

Envision Web Marketing
Log in to become a member of Daiv Russell's Fan Club!


In the 1960s and earlier, frequently big corporations were logically arranged into silos, in which divisions of employees reported to a line or functional manager. The attempt to restructure the organization to develop workable project management teams is referred to as a matrix organization structure.

Several different types of matrix organizations are in existence. In each type of matrix organizational structure, the goal is to create a balance of power between each manager's particular functional needs. The primary types of matrices include: The Balanced Matrix, Weak Matrix and Strong Matrix organizational structure. This article will cover the benefits and drawbacks of the balanced matrix organization structure.

 

A Balanced Matrix Organizational Structure

According to the old adage, absolute power results in absolute corruption. Because in every type of matrix structure a power struggle occurs, a method of balancing each group is necessary to avoid this problem. If this is not controlled, one group of managers will control the other group. This will be unhealthy for both the project and the overall organization, even if individual aspects of an organization or isolated projects may continue to succeed for a time. For example, a singularly controlling project manager might dominate a functional manager and force them to always relinquish the most valuable team members with which to complete the projects.

One manner of solving this issue is to devise organizational boundaries that determines when each manager can control a worker. These guidelines should be based upon a particular set of circumstances. Consider an example in which a rule is made stating that a worker will be managed solely by the functional manager if an expected project will last for less than a week's time. If, however, the project is expected to last longer than a week, the project manager will be in control. Alternatively, a rule could be devised stating that a worker may not be employed by a project manager to work on two projects in a row.

A variety of possible rules and structures may be imposed to achieve the goal of balancing power between project and functional managers so that a win/lose condition is avoided. Obviously, the balanced matrix takes its name from the balance of power that results in this structural format

Daiv Russell is a management and marketing consultant with Envision Consulting in Tampa, Florida. Get more information on matrix organizational structure at project-management-course.info. Choose the right Project Management Software and optimize your Gantt Charts



tweet this!



Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Daiv Russell's Fan Club!

No comments yet.


Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 2,580 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 2/14/2008 3:08:04 PM.
View other articles written by Daiv Russell (3,699)
Daiv Russell


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Project Management Training: Balanced Matrix Organization Structure

Project Management Training: Strong Matrix Organization Structure

Statistical Quality Control and Quality Control Charts

Fishbone Analysis Using the Ishikawa Diagram

Project Management Training: Weak Matrix Organization Structure

Root Cause Analysis: Fishbone Diagram and Analysis

Find Your Root Cause With Fishbone Diagrams

Project Management Training: Matrix Organization Structure Origins

History of Project Management: How Did We Get Here?

Gantt Charts & PERT Charts - How to use these things?

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.016.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company