Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 7,782 Authors
70,498 Quality Articles
& 7,747 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Mogama (15,965)
Bruce Horst (142)
Joel Hendon (16,285)
Michael Ramzy (633)
E. Raymond Rock (3,068)
Ira Coffin (6,669)
Connor Davidson (5,131)
Ben Morrish (7,936)
Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Sandra E. Graham (7,883)
Fran Larson (2,271)
Shari Vaudo (418)
David Tanguay (9,577)
Missing Link (766)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Top 7 Benefits of Recycling

The Great Pacific Garbage Patch - A Primer

List of 32 Society Benefits from Mattress Recycling

Celebrate America Recycles Day On Nov. 15

Save The Environment By Recycling

Plant A Tree For World Sight Day

An Introduction To Recycling Facts

Illuminating the Great Outdoors with Energy-Saving Light Bulbs

Global Warming Facts

Introducing a New Flavor of Energy-Efficient Light Bulbs

Home » Categories » Science & Technology » Environment » Blame Global Warming on Nature--Earth Moving Closer to Sun » Printer Friendly

Danny Davids

Blame Global Warming on Nature--Earth Moving Closer to Sun

Rated 4.5 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Danny Davids
Submitted Tuesday, April 01, 2008
Danny Davids (19,741)
Danny Davids


Log in to become a member of Danny Davids's Fan Club!


We've heard so much about global warming for so long that most people either accept it as fact or ignore it as hype.  Well, Al Gore is right.  The Earth is indeed growing warmer.  His assumption that the cause is due to mankind's polluting the environment is faulty, however.  It turns out that the major culprit of the earth's increasing temperature has less to do with man's dirty habits and much, much more to do with gravity and celestial dynamics.  The bottom line is this:  The Earth is closer to the Sun than it has been in years.  Changes in Earth's position and orbit over the next few centuries will cause it to move even closer to the Sun, causing our environment to warm up.  In as little as a hundred years, Earth's climate will have changed so drastically that life as we know it may be unable to survive.  And mankind may be unable to reverse the process.

Elementary school children are taught that the Moon revolves around the Earth, the Earth revolves around the Sun, and the Sun revolves around the central point of our Milky Way galaxy.  Simple enough, yet the gravitational influences each of these systems exerts on the Earth causes tiny fluctuations in our path through the universe.  In particular, the Earth's orbit around the Sun changes as a result of these forces.

Scientists have known about something called the "Milankovitch theory" for years.  Named after the Yugoslav mathematician who first proposed it, it is the astronomical or orbital theory of climate variations.  The theory identifies three types of variation in the Earth's orbit around the Sun which could act as mechanisms to change the global climate: changes in the tilt of the Earth's axis (obliquity), changes in the shape of Earth's orbit (eccentricity) and the shifting of the equinoxes (precession).  The three orbital variations together affect the total amount of sunlight received by the Earth, and distribution of that sunlight at different latitudes and at different times.  These changes occur over periods of tens of thousands of years, and the climate changes resulting from these orbital changes occur over similar time periods.  The Milankovitch theory of climate change has been used to explain the global climate of the last two million years, with changes between warmer interglacial periods and colder Ice Ages occurring over a 100,000 year cycle, as well as predict upcoming trends in climate change.

Obliquity is the tilt of the Earth's axis as compared to the plane in which the Earth revolves around the sun.  Currently the Earth's axis is tilted 23.5 degrees.  That value can vary between 21 and 25 degrees in a cycle that takes about 40,000 years to complete.  Eccentricity is the shape of the Earth's orbit around the sun.  It can vary from nearly circular to more elliptical, or oval-shaped, in a 100,000-year cycle.  Over the past few centuries Earth's orbit has become more elliptical, which means we approach the sun more closely than we do when the orbit is more circular.  Precession is the tendency for the Earth's axis to "wobble" as it spins, much like a top does.  One "wobble" takes 23,000 years to complete and affects when seasons occur on Earth. 

The combination of all three cycles at this point in time means that the Earth's orbit is closer to the Sun than at other times in the past.  As a result the Earth is receiving as much as 30 percent more sunlight than it has in the past several hundred years.  More sunlight means more heat, which means more warming, which means...well, ask Al Gore.

Scientists are divided on the accuracy of the Milankovitch theory, and many vehemently insist that our current warming trend is the result of mankind's mismanagement of the environment rather than natural causes.  I can't blame them.  After all, if global warming is man's fault, then man can make changes to reverse the effects of his mistakes.  However, if it's all due to nature, there may be nothing we can do except sit back and turn up our air conditioners.  That doesn't go over well, especially when you tell the masses that the end of the world is near and there's nothing we can do to stop it.  Watch any end-of-the-earth science fiction movie and see how the masses react when told the planet will be destroyed in just a few days.

Before you panic, realize that the Earth is not in danger of falling into the Sun and burning up.  But if you want to know what life could be like for your great-grandkids...well, have you ever seen the movie "Waterworld"?


Share your viewpoints on current events, business, politics, hobbies, or whatever strikes your fancy.  Sign up at http://SearchWarp.com/Register.asp and join the SearchWarp writing community today!

Danny Davids has worked in the computer industry for nearly 30 years. He has provided end-user support, training, and network administration services in arenas as diverse as the service bureau, health, education, communication, manufacturing, the arts, and consulting industries. He currently works as a computer analyst for a government agency. He is married, has two dogs, two adult children, and an absolutely adorable grandson.
 
Share your favorite pet-related stories at http://www.mypettale.com.



tweet this!



Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Danny Davids's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Anonymous (1 year 217 days ago.)
That is very interesting. Thanks for that.
Respond to this comment

» left by Myla Madson (3,380)
Myla Madson
(1 year 217 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Hey Danny, my ex has been voicing this same theory for yeas now. He's in the heating and air business and the government has placed restrictions and eventual bans on "ozone-depleting" refrigerants which has made the price of freon sky roket. And get this... the replacement refrigerant is even more expensive. Global warming...what a great concept for the government to use to justify its involvement and regulation of yet another industry. Govt. regulation means higher prices and more money for the poloticians and special interest groups. While I understand and agree that r-12 and r-22 refrigerants can be depleting the ozone layer, I believe more strongly in the fact that the Earth's orbit is not a perfect circle and we do have cycles when we are closer to the sun and charging heating and air companies $160.00 for a bottle if freon isn't going to solve the problem. Of course the closer we get to the sun, the more we are going to need A/C so maybe the govt. knows what they are doing...did I just say that out loud? lol Great article!!!
Respond to this comment
» left by Danny Davids (19,815)
Danny Davids
(1 year 207 days ago.)

Myla, the funny thing is that everything in this article is fact--except for the part about the Earth being an uninhabitable water ball in 100 years. I wonder if Al Gore and Company are aware of this? They probably are, and have just decided to ignore it. Humanity makes a much better villain than nature.
Respond to this comment

» left by jordan from deerfield beach, florda (1 year 207 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Thanks for writing this page it helped me alot
Respond to this comment

» left by Nai`a from Pa`ia, HI (1 year 158 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
So, the fact that 99% of PEER-REVIEWED articles agree that the CLIMATE CRISIS is here doesn't count?

Respond to this comment
» left by Danny Davids (19,815)
Danny Davids
(1 year 153 days ago.)

Nai'a, I'd be curious to see how you came up with the 99% figure. There are way too many people in the scientific community who have conflicting opinions concerning the topic. The global average temperature increasing seven-tenths of one degree in one hundred years constitutes a crisis? Sheesh. Finally, there are more than only human influences on our climate, and people seem to conveniently ignore that. I only pointed out that our dear Mother Nature pitches in from time to time as well.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (354 days 15 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 2.5 out of 5
Global warming is due to a mixture of things, and yes this may be one of them. But there are other factors too, such as the rise of co2 in the atmosphere.
 
Anyway, a VERY interesting article and it did help me a lot.
 
:)

Respond to this comment

» left by Orwells Ghost from Here, USA (323 days 9 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
CO2 has nothing to do with climate change.
 Al Gore is a propaganda machine.
 CO2 follows the climate change trend, not the other way around.
 
Sun spot activity is what causes higher temperatures.
High activity = higher temps and vice versa.
 Solar wind is another big factor, and when the 2 mix, it creates our weather.
 
The same people profiting from Global Warming are the same ones that were saying just 20 years earlier that there was a Global Cooling crisis and they learned how profitable it was and have revived it now that sun spot activity has been higher than its been in a long time.
 
The high activity even nearly threatened to wipe out orbiting satellites.
 Its not rocket science really.
 Sun spot activity being the source of global temperatures was first observed over a thousand years ago.
 
We are nearing the point when the earth is farthest from the sun, aphelion. It was on or close to July 4, 2008. After that time, earth will be slowly getting closer to the sun until January 2 or there about, when earth reaches its closest point to the sun, called perihelion. At aphelion earth is traveling more slowly in its orbit; at perihelion it is traveling a little more rapidly. This is all related to the fact that earth's orbit around the sun is an ellipse and not a circle. Our orbit is close to circular, but it is not a perfect circle. For those in doubt (more than likely northerners who find it hard to believe that our summer is at a time when we are farther from the sun) the earth's seasons are caused by our axial tilt of about 23.4 degrees, and not by relative distance from the sun.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (164 days 1 hour ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
This article was very helpful. Solar maximus will be in 2012 and this may be a time when there is a real problem with global rise in temperature in addition to large scale power grid failure. Leading up to this time we will see that there are people that would like to use these natural events to gain wealth and power by deception and manipulation through the almost total control of the information we recieve. Beware of the going green philosophy, it may just be a ruse to build a New World Order in charge of cleaning things up. They will certainly be cleaning up, but not the way we need. Total control of wealth and power will corrupt absolutely and this global warming go green thing is one aspect of the master plan.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (122 days 5 hours ago.)
Since CO2 has nothing to do with Climate Change, that means I'm going to keep driving my SUV and burning gas. I hate the stupid people who want to tax it, they should be shot. If anything gas prices should be cheaper.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 1,967 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 4/1/2008 12:00:01 AM.
View other articles written by Danny Davids (19,741)
Danny Davids


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Flow Velocity Measurement

Growing Plants with LEDs

Limestone information and facts

Marble Information

Global Warming: If You're Overweight It's Your Fault!

Global Warming- How are Animals Affected by Global Warming

Centrifugal Chillers

How To Make Water From Air

Australia's love of coastal living is leading to some serious environmental problems.

Going Green By Going Smart

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.047.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company