Nominal Breakthroughs: Beating corruption

This is the first post in the "Nominal Breakthroughs" series, which will talk about news that is farcically touted as groundbreaking.

The fight against political corruption is one of the most important tasks confronting many of today's developing countries; for instance, many leaders have stolen billions of dollars (which is worth a lot more in Africa/Asia than it is worth here) from their starving population. For this reason, the UN has spent a lot of resources in the past five years to establish the Convention Against Corruption, which establishes a set worldwide anti-corruption regulations. These regulations will allow a country to prevent this theft, criminalize the thieves, and recover lost assets.

Let's let go of the fact that it took them five years to say that "theft is illegal, thieves are criminals, and stolen money should be recovered." It's more interesting to focus on this: they are expecting the leaders of a corrupt government to persecute corrupt leaders. If you were stealing money, would you really want to bring attention to the fact that money is being stolen? I do see potential benefits from such legislation… but why did it take them so much time and energy to pass such a simple regulation with no real means of enforcement? I know that it will be completely ineffective in my home country of Pakistan, but they tried to mask this by publicizing the Zambian government's recent recovery of a measly $60 million. I wonder how much money they spent trying to make this convention a reality… will they even recover what they spent?

Since I usually get angry comments when I challenge the status quo, I decided to do a Google search for scholarly articles about the subject (which are written by people who know what they're talking about). Click here to see the response study by the Anti-Corruption Resource Centre.

Where is the incentive for corrupt governments to follow these new regulations?

You can see articles right after they're published by visiting the author's blog (click here) or subscribing to his RSS feed (click here).

►Reprint Rights◄

Log in to become a member of Shan-ul-Hai's Fan Club!

Comments on this article: (2 total)

» left by robert melaccio sr. (1 year 149 days ago.)

Another intelligent piece. I can never understand how educated people never seem to see the facts for what they truly are, truth. Example, Immigration. Immigration is a legal process whereby an applicant applies for entry, pays fee and get this has someone swear they will assist them to find employment, a home, a job, etc. They then wait for approval. My uncle is waiting 20 plus years. Now Obama is for reqrding this action by illegal workers, fact, He says nothing about those who are going through the legal process, nothing about felonies, stealing bith civil and moral and religious sin, that just don;t seem to count and people speak to his record in Civil Rights? Please wher have we lost it? Yes, we have come to ethical realtivity where jumping over a fence, stealing someones identity and working for under the cover wages or less, explotation of these workers, and tell me it isn't so, does not matter. Frankly in my opinion we are gone, not going going gone, gone when simple logic no longer applies. Good work, I enjoy your reasoning and work.

Respond to this comment

» left by Shan-ul-Hai ⁽¹⁶⁵⁾
Shan-ul-Hai (1 year 149 days ago.)
I agree completely about immigration. People are always talking about streamlining the process for illegal immigration, but they never say anything about the people (like myself) who come here legally, get an education, work at a respectable job, and still have to wait 20 years to get citizenship. I've been here 16 years, but I still have a Pakistani passport, which prevents me from visiting most of the countries that I'd like to go to.
Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question: