Writers' Community!

Search:

Writers' Community!

SearchWarp Home Submit An Article Frequently Asked Questions Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,516 Authors
43,931 Quality Articles
& 3,605 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Jane Bullard (1,210)
Robert Melaccio, Sr. (4,840)
E. Raymond Rock (2,327)
Judi Lake (2,270)
Camille Strate (1,254)
Teresa Ortiz (4,075)
Jennifer Cuddy (859)
Christine Akiteng (63,433)
Sandra E. Graham (1,291)
Mark Parsec (11,873)
Angie Lewis (6,093)
Joel Hirschhorn (397)
Missing Link (1,133)
Terry Mitchell (1,028)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
What is the difference between a Living Will and Durable Power of Attorney?

America’s Attachment to Litigation Has Negative Impact

Workplace Law Update: Employer Bares Burden of Proof In Defending Defamation Claims

Refusal To Hire Physically Impaired Not Unlawful

Redundancy, Know Your Rights To Consultation.

Unconstitutional decision in U.S. Family Courts

Employer Compliance Enforcement: Being Prepared

Does TUPE Have Ex Territorial Effect?

Stress At Work and Employment Law.

Why do we need the New Sex Equality Laws 2008?

Article Categories
Animals & Pets
Arts, Crafts & Hobbies
Automotive
Business
Careers & Employment
Computers & Networking
Do it Yourself (DIY)
Education
Electronics
Entertainment
Fashion
Finance
Furniture
Games
Government
Health
Holidays & Special Occasions
Home Life
Industry
Internet
Kids and Teens
Legal
Literature
News
Personal
Professional Services
Real Estate
Recreation & Leisure
Reference
Reviews
Science & Technology
Shopping
Society
Sports
Travel
Webmaster Resources
Website Technologies
Writing
Pick of the Day
Home » Categories » Legal » Legal Information » Update On Proposed Legislation, Retrogression and Pending Solutions » Reprint Rights » Printer Friendly

Update On Proposed Legislation, Retrogression and Pending Solutions

Rated 2.5 out of 5
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Nicholas Cifuentes
Submitted Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Submitted by: Nicholas Cifuentes (1,078) Bronze Level Author Verified Account Nicholas Cifuentes blog View Bio for Nicholas Cifuentes
Immigration Solutions
Log in to become a member of Nicholas Cifuentes's Fan Club!


Unfortunately, retrogression of the immigrant visa quota is still causing severe delays in the immigration of large numbers of needed professionals and skilled workers, especially healthcare workers.   However, recent developments give us more hope for a solution than we have experienced in the recent past.  

 

Legislation has been introduced in the House of Representatives (HR 5924) which addresses the shortages of certain healthcare workers and offers significant solutions.   Specifically, all quotas would be waived for Schedule A shortage occupations (registered nurses and physical therapists) as long as the immigrant visa petition (I-140) is filed by September 30, 2011.   This would give healthcare facilities approximately 3 years to bring in significantly more foreign nurses and physical therapists during that period, although consulates would be limited to approving no more than 20,000 nurse or physical therapist cases in a year.   The ability of the government to handle the increased workload in a timely manner, as always, remains in doubt.   The USCIS would be required to process the I-140 immigrant visa petition within 30 days, a vast improvement over the current 6-12 month processing times.   Again, the ability of the government’s limited resources to handle the expedited processing time remains in doubt.  

 

All nursing visas issued under this law would require a $1,500 fee, with limited exceptions, to be used to fund grants for schools of nursing.   While commendable, past efforts by the government in other areas to fund the development of the American workforce at the expense of employers of foreign workers have met with little or no success.   Finally, immigrant visa applicants will need to attest that they do not owe their country of residence a financial obligation that was incurred for their education so that they would remain in that country.  

 

This legislation is sponsored by members of both political parties, one of whom is known as tough on immigration.   While we remain hopeful about the chances for success for this proposed law, a word of caution is necessary.   The proposed legislation will need to survive debate and amendments in both the House and the Senate before it ever gets to the President for signature and becomes law.   Election year politics and the illegal immigration/enforcement debate are also obstacles to passage of this law.

 

In addition, HR 5882 was recently introduced in the House of Representatives which proposes to recapture unused employment-based immigrant visas from past years.   This could be as many as 218,000 immigrant visas.   This is significantly more than the 50,000 Schedule A immigrant visas that were recaptured by special legislation in 2005 and ran out very quickly.   This proposed law would act to speed up the EB-3 immigrant visa quota category which is where most nurses are delayed.   This law appears to have bipartisan support and is sponsored by leading members of Congress.   However, as above, the same word of caution applies.

 

It is worth noting that the EB-3 immigrant visa quota cutoff date have been advancing more rapidly than usual due to the projections of the State Department for future demand on the limited quotas.   If those projections prove inaccurate or if other unexpected factors intervene, the recent progress could slow or retrogress as in the past.  

 

Finally, a proposal to increase the period of stay for TN status from 1 year to 3 years, has made its way through the OMB.   If this takes effect, Canadian and Mexican citizens who have TN status or visas pursuant to NAFTA as nurses, physical therapists, etc., may find it easier to move from nonimmigrant TN status to immigrant without adversely affecting their TN status, especially if one or both of the proposed laws to increase immigrant visa quotas is passed.    

 

We will keenly monitor all the above and other issues as they develop.   We are pleased to report that we are starting to see a glimpse.




This author of this Article has choosen to make this article available with free reprint rights.
Click here to copy this article.

Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Nicholas Cifuentes's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:
No comments yet.


Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 177 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Wednesday, June 11, 2008
View other articles written by Nicholas Cifuentes (1,078) Bronze Level Author Verified Account Nicholas Cifuentes blog View Bio for Nicholas Cifuentes


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Contesting a Will: Protect Your Parents from Undue Influence

The Immigrant Visa Interview - Immigrant Visa Processing

Lewd Act with a Child under 14

Oral Copulation Sex Crime

Lay-off or Dismissal, under Ontario Law --It All Amounts to the Same Thing.

Vandalism Property Damage Law

Sentencing Alternatives: SCRAM Program

Update On Proposed Legislation, Retrogression and Pending Solutions

Legal Requirements of Roadblocks

How to Write an Ironclad Landscaping Contract

Home  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company