Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,202 Authors
71,994 Quality Articles
& 7,418 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Joel Hirschhorn (2,847)
Ira Coffin (13,580)
Yangki Christine Akiteng (131,850)
Connor Davidson (5,541)
Mark Parsec (16,631)
Julian Price (12,254)
Michael Ramzy (821)
Edward Rhymes (9,204)
Dianne Lehmann (5,838)
Fran Larson (20,012)
Gregory Lewis (1,456)
Joel Hendon (18,567)
Sandra E. Graham (9,984)
Shari Vaudo (1,123)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
The Voting Season in the Rearview Mirror

McCain: A Man of Class, Even in Defeat.

The Anti-Incumbency Movement Is Dead

A Monday Morning Quarterback's Postmortem of the Election Season

The American Ideal: Out Of Many, One

Road Map to the White House: Four Steps to How Obama Won

THe First Lady of These United States of America

The Searchwarp Post-Election Challenge

Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . . Obama . . .

A Sneak Peak at Two Americas with the 2008 Presidential Election

Home » Categories » Government » Voting / Electoral Process » Decide Based On Credentials... Not Faces » Printer Friendly

Shan-ul-Hai

Decide Based On Credentials... Not Faces

Rated 5 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Shan-ul-Hai
Submitted Monday, June 23, 2008
Shan-ul-Hai (161)
Shan-ul-Hai

Globally Rational
Add to your Favorite Articles - You are a member of Shan-ul-Hai's Fan Club!


Back in February 2007, USA Today/Gallup asked Americans the following question:

"Between now and the 2008 political conventions, there will be discussion about the qualifications of presidential candidates -- their education, age, religion, race, and so on. If your party nominated a generally well-qualified person for president who happened to be 72 years old, would you vote for that person?"

42% of people said "no" and 15% were undecided. That means that if their party nominated a 72 year-old, 3 out of 7 people would vote for somebody else. In the same poll, 48-50% of people supported Obama or Hillary in a November election against McCain. That would lead a person to believe that, since 42% of people should technically vote against McCain solely because of his age, only 6-8% of people actually supported Obama or Hillary. In fact, I think it's much easier to vote for McCain when you attach a name to his age... people were averse to voting for a 72 year-old, but plenty of people were willing to vote for McCain.

Are we serious? In a perfect world, I think we'd remove all of the faces from political elections. If we only knew a candidate's political stances and credentials (and we never saw their faces until after they get elected), I think more people would dismiss McCain just because they don't want to vote for a guy who'd be 80 years old by the time he finishes his second term. What do you think?

I like looking at data and studies... they cast a lot of light on reality. I've noticed plenty of people say things like "I don't care about the numbers, this is what my experience says"... but I don't think that any single person's experience is as valuable as the experience of the thousands of people involved in the study. If we weren't willing to vote for a 72 year-old, then why were we willing to vote for McCain?

I like McCain... I won't vote for him (not because of his age, but because of his stance on the issues), but I do like him. I think that he's better than Hillary and that he's not as good as Obama... but that's irrelevant. The question here is about numbers; if we weren't willing to vote for a 72 year-old, then why were we willing to vote for McCain?



tweet this!



Reprint Rights

You are a member of Shan-ul-Hai's Fan Club!

Comments on this article: (1 total)


» left by jamespkrehbiel from scottsdale, az (1 year 145 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Shan, To further your argument, how many people in that same poll will not vote for a candidate strickly because he/she is Black? It doesn't matter about issues to these people. These a the "low information" voters. They fly by the seat of their pants. Qualifications and issues are of little consequence. Great article!

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 127 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 6/23/2008 12:32:14 AM.
View other articles written by Shan-ul-Hai (161)
Shan-ul-Hai


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Why Should I Vote? The Pros and Cons of Voting

"For the Common Good", the New Democratic Slogan, but Whose Good?

The Pros and Cons of McCain's VP Selection

Super Delegates vs. Electoral College

How to Fix the USA

Poll Tax Redux

Should Election Day Be Made A National Holiday?

Decide Based On Credentials... Not Faces

Campaign Fund Raising Follies

"Hail to the Chief": How to Watch This Week's Presidential Debate

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.016.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company