Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 7,767 Authors
70,450 Quality Articles
& 6,614 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Ira Coffin (6,669)
Connor Davidson (5,131)
Joel Hendon (16,285)
Ben Morrish (7,936)
Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Sandra E. Graham (7,883)
Fran Larson (2,271)
Shari Vaudo (418)
David Tanguay (9,577)
Michael Ramzy (633)
Missing Link (766)
E. Raymond Rock (3,068)
Gregory Lewis (1,603)
Nancy Daniels (1,550)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Republican Teabaggers Make Wrong Choice

10 Similarities Between Dinosaurs and Republicans

What's the Big Deal?

Is Michael Steele Leading Republicans to Waterloo?

So You Think I'm a Right-Winger?

Robert Melaccio, Sr., "How Do You Say Goodbye, To The Paul Harvey of SearchWarp"?

Letter to The President. Inspired by Article by David Tanguay

An email To The President

Beyond Adedoja's Suspension From AC

How can the Constitution of the United States so easily be discarded?

Home » Categories » Government » Political Platforms » If I Hear The Word "Flip-Flop" One More Time..... » Reprint Rights » Printer Friendly

Dan Bimrose

In The Middle

If I Hear The Word "Flip-Flop" One More Time.....

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Dan Bimrose
Submitted Sunday, July 06, 2008
Dan Bimrose (1,259)
Dan Bimrose

Coffee and Prozac
Log in to become a member of Dan Bimrose's Fan Club!


.....I am going to scream. No I have nothing against that ever popular summer footwear. So far both Obama and McCain have been accused of flip-flopping on certain key points. Does it matter? Is it important? I personally do not think it matters much. At least not as much as the party leaders think.

These two campaigns are just now starting to take shape. They are just now trying to figure out what it is going to take to win this election. In many ways they are trying to figure out what is best for our country and what we the people need and want.

If the world and our lives were static then there would never be any need to change our opinions or ideas. However our world and our lives are constantly changing. Thank goodness or it would be pretty boring.

As I have grown older and wiser I too have changed many of my opinions from when I was young and perhaps foolish. My family is very grateful for that fact.

If it were true that "you cannot teach an old dog new tricks" then McCain would be in serious trouble. Holding on to ideas or even ideals that you once did just so people cannot call you a "flip-flopper" makes one stubborn and dangerous. I keep hearing that the McCain of 2000 would not vote for the McCain of 2008. Good. Let us just hope that the McCain of 2008 is a little smarter than the one that inhabited his body eight years prior.

I would imagine that when you have reached the level that these two candidates have reached that they have access to advisors and experts that they did not prior to this. No one man can be an expert in everything. I do not expect Obama or McCain to know everything there is to know about the military, economics, agriculture, foreign policy etc. etc.. I do however expect them to surround themselves with people that are the experts in these areas. I expect them to listen to their advice and act once all the information is in. These two men are learning. The one who does become President of the United States will have access to even more information. I suspect that some of this information will further effect and possibly change how they will handle things.

Many commentators have speculated that these two men are making policy changes just to appease the voters. The implication is that this is a terrible thing. Not necessarily. In democratic rule the belief is held that those we elect represent we the people. We are going to vote for the candidate that most closely represents our interests. Moving toward the center is certainly politically expedient. More voters congregate in the center. If you stay to the far left or the far right you represent a smaller portion of the population. If by changing your policies you satisfy a larger portion of the population then this would seem to me to be a good thing.

Of course this is only true if we consider the voters to be intelligent, informed and have the best interest of our country in mind.

I am a voter and you are a voter. I am not prepared to think either of us are stupid.

Dan Bimrose is the creator of coffeeandprozac.com a website devoted to making people think, laugh or cry. Daily Opinions, Editorials, and Stories He suggests dropping bread crumbs so that you can find your way back on a daily basis.

You can find out more about Dan Bimrose and his new book Max Yasgur's Farm at danbimrose.com.



tweet this!

The author of this article has chosen to make this article available with free reprint rights.
Click here to copy this article.

Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Dan Bimrose's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by robert melaccio Sr (1 year 123 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Dan, I differ in opinion. While you make a valid point yet, let me ask, just when do you formulate a concept, idea, a solution a course of action and develop it and stick by it? That is called leadership, discerning, weighing of outcomes, forming a course of action, implementing it and seeing through to a successful conclusion. Now being able to adjust the plan, change, alter is all part of sound planning and leadership but don't make a statement you know nothing about until you have to make a decision and you have all the facts. Certainly people can and do change their minds. However, in leadership you do not blow with the wind one day and make a change and then suddenly wind up at back at home base. In my opinion that is the issue at hand. One day they say one thing the next another. Yes to Hispanic's one thing, to free traders another and to the masses well something entirely different. Hey it is all there to be gleaned. They say it not anyone else. Good article, stirs the thinking.


» left by Sandra E. Graham (7,796)
Sandra E. Graham
from Paragould, Ar USA (1 year 122 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great article, Dan. I loved your play on the word "flip-flop". We may all be doing a lot of_______ing (and I won't say the word, so you won't have to hear it again) before this election is over! Just when you think you have one of these guys figured out, he throws another curve ball at us. I was hoping that this would be one election that we wouldn't have to decide just between the 'lesser of two evils'; but I see now that this is not going to happen. Thanks for a great article. Sandra


» left by Kii Kynzer from Out There USA (1 year 95 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
This has been the worst election ever, because the elite media has controlled the outcome of who got the nomination for both parties. The disgraceful use of their news and election coverage was the worst in history. It was intended to make Obama president. As for flip flopping, YES I SAID IT, it isn't wrong to change your mind if the situation warrants it; such as drilling for oil...something even some Scandanavian Countries are now doing offshore due to the new safe technology that is environmentally friendly...it has become safe; so changing your mind on certain subjects is not flipflop but common sense. Be sure to read the book THE OBAMA NATION by Corsi; and vote with your patriotism in tact.   Kii Kynzer  my blogspot blog is called THE FREEDOM PLATFORM.


» left by Joel Hendon (15,913)
Joel Hendon
(1 year 51 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Dan, this was an excellent article and I agree, if the candidates never changed their minds, we'd be in a heap of trouble. Actually, both candidates were against offshore drilling as well as ANWR, McCain changed his mind first  but only after Newt Gingrich had pointed out to the nation just how stupid we were to be restricting those places when it has been shown that they can be drilled without anything near major damage to the environment.
 
The comment just above this one is correct. Everybody is now going to drill offshore except us. Even Cuba with the assistance of China... in the Gulf of Mecxico. It is reliably reported that we have access to more oil than Saudi Arabia.


Please Log In to Leave a Comment.
This Article has been viewed 1,247 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 7/6/2008 2:43:20 AM.
View other articles written by Dan Bimrose (1,259)
Dan Bimrose


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
The Race Card

If I Hear The Word "Flip-Flop" One More Time.....

Bob The Builder, Dora The Explorer, and now Joe The Plumber?

An Email To President Bush

I Don't Believe the 'Bias Liberal Media' Bit

John McCain’s Stance on Energy & Environment

How can the Constitution of the United States so easily be discarded?

Solving the Immigration Problem:

Sarah “Barracuda” Palin: A Moose in Every Pot?

How to See the Truth About Presidential Candidate Ron Paul

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.031.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company