Writers' Community!
Home
Front Page Page Two Columnists Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,766 Authors
48,576 Quality Articles
& 5,591 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Tex Norman (4,139)
David Pekrul (534)
Robert Melaccio, Sr. (6,349)
Joel Kontinen (1,154)
Susan Thom (8,669)
Jane Bullard (1,982)
Sandra E. Graham (2,204)
Barbara Clark (454)
Ira Coffin (443)
Joel Hendon (4,826)
Jeff Brown (7,740)
Ieuan Dolby (1,415)
Teresa Ortiz (4,719)
Dianne Lehmann (2,794)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Condoleezza + Gaddafi = More Oil!

Motives As To Why No Vote For Drilling Offshore & Anwar

High priced gasoline is not the PROBLEM. High priced gasoline is the SOLUTION!

Two Men With A Bold New Strategy

To Drill Or Not To Drill? Why The Ban Should Be Lifted

Will We Ever See Cheap Gas Again?

Perhaps The U.S. Should Burn This Bridge

Does T. Boone Pickens Have A Personal Agenda?

Use Freedom to Protest or Use it to Attest? Oil Tycoon, T. Boone Pickens

Nancy Pelosi, Congress and High Gasoline Prices

Home » Categories » Government » Energy Policy » Three Points On ANWR » Reprint Rights » Printer Friendly

Three Points On ANWR

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by The Cultural Economist
Submitted Monday, July 07, 2008
The Cultural Economist (62)
http://tceconomist.blogspot.com
Log in to become a member of The Cultural Economist's Fan Club!


There has been much discussion - mostly acerbic, ignorant and deceptive - about drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). Without taking sides, I would like to point out three facts everyone is missing:

In order to support America's economy, we are going to need every barrel we can pump during our transition to other fuels (and life styles). The less oil we have, the higher the rate of inflation, the higher the rate of unemployment, and the worse our recession will be for all Americans. If you would like to understand why, then pick up a copy of my book "Oil, Jihad and Destiny". It's all there.

Curtailing oil production will increase air pollution. America depends on oil to keep warm in winter. Heating oil, propane, and kerosene are cleaner burning than coal. If these fuels are unavailable, or unaffordable, then families are going to burn waste, wood and coal to stay warm dirty or not. This by the way is already happening.

Drilling in places like ANWR is just the tip of the iceberg (a pun). The USGS believes 25% of the world's remaining oil is under Arctic ice (soon to be the Arctic sea). Russia and Canada are already sparring over rights to drill. If we are concerned about the environment, it should be understood the Russians have a miserable environmental record. If we do not claim it first, and they drill, it will be disastrous for the environment because they are just not going to care. The point is, liberal environmentalists are NOT going to stop exploration for oil in the Arctic. It's just a matter of who does the drilling. If America doesn't, then some other nation will get the oil dirty or not.

It's nice to be concerned about the caribou and a polar bear. But don't you believe it is also important to be concerned about human welfare? Is there a way to inject a dose of reality into the ANWR debate?

Ronald R. Cooke

The Cultural Economist

Author: Detensive Nation




This author of this Article has choosen to make this article available with free reprint rights.
Click here to copy this article.

Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of The Cultural Economist's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:
No comments yet.


Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 156 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Monday, July 07, 2008
View other articles written by The Cultural Economist (62)


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Libya: Petroleum Taxation & Royalty Risks for IOCs

Nuclear Vs Fossil Fuels

A Large Price to Pay for a Gallon of Gasoline

3 Phase Converters

Go Green, Save Energy and Money by Turning Off Your Computer Equipment

Have High Oil Prices Hurt Big Oil?

Does T. Boone Pickens Have A Personal Agenda?

Nancy Pelosi, Congress and High Gasoline Prices

The Pentagon's Battle Plan Is To Go Green

Gas $1.50/gal. If We Use Alaska's Oil!!

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company