Search:

Writers' Community!

Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,466 Authors
46,433 Quality Articles
& 6,279 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Joel Hendon (4,245)
April Lorier (5,991)
Beth Tabak (40)
Laura Trahan (32,804)
Susan Thom (8,078)
Mike Fak (3,480)
mogama (17,491)
Robert Melaccio, Sr. (6,527)
Terry Mitchell (2,141)
Mr. Keith (1,766)
Ieuan Dolby (1,378)
Dianne Lehmann (2,559)
Rodney Biamby (138)
David Tanguay (6,326)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Condoleezza + Gaddafi = More Oil!

Motives As To Why No Vote For Drilling Offshore & Anwar

High priced gasoline is not the PROBLEM. High priced gasoline is the SOLUTION!

Two Men With A Bold New Strategy

To Drill Or Not To Drill? Why The Ban Should Be Lifted

Will We Ever See Cheap Gas Again?

Perhaps The U.S. Should Burn This Bridge

Does T. Boone Pickens Have A Personal Agenda?

Use Freedom to Protest or Use it to Attest? Oil Tycoon, T. Boone Pickens

Nancy Pelosi, Congress and High Gasoline Prices

Home » Categories » Government » Energy Policy » Nancy Pelosi, Congress and High Gasoline Prices » Printer Friendly

Nancy Pelosi, Congress and High Gasoline Prices

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Josh Greenberger
Submitted Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Submitted by: Josh Greenberger (936)
Log in to become a member of Josh Greenberger's Fan Club!


(June 2008) Nancy Pelosi will probably go down in history as the greatest enemy-from-within this country has ever had. As bad as Bush's ratings are, the Democratic Congress' is even worse, and Nancy Pelosi scrapes the bottom of the barrel.

Her claim of not opening more offshore drilling because energy companies are not using federal lands already open to energy development is pure nonsense. If energy companies are not using federal lands already open to them, what difference does it make if we open more sites for drilling? You can't hurt the environment by NOT drilling on more land.

And if the oil companies do decide to drill, why not open more land and give them greater opportunity?

Is Pelosi punishing the oil companies for not drilling before? What an infantile attitude for a grown woman, and especially for one in a position of power. It's like kindergarten time in Washington.

Pelosi is actually punishing all Americans with her foolish, immature shenanigans. We must put a stop to this. She works for the American people.

It's easy to blame our current predicament of high gasoline prices on insufficient oil production or export by OPEC. It's more difficult to blame ourselves for passivity and lack of resolve. There's no question that OPEC could help alleviate the situation. But we could do the same on our own, and, at the same time, stop the majority of our dependence on foreign oil.

If we can get our lawmakers to put aside politics and special interests, we could roll back the price of gas considerably. An example of the kind of nonsense that's keeping us from increasing our own oil production is the haggling over whether or not to allow oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).

Objections to oil exploration in ANWR have come mostly from environmental groups who worry about endangering the caribou (reindeer). However, only 1.5 million acre, or 8%, on the northern coast of ANWR is being considered for development, while the remaining 17.5 million acres, 92%, of ANWR will remain closed to development. If oil is discovered, less than 2000 acres of the over 1.5 million acres of the Coastal Plain would be affected -- that's less than one half of one percent.

With the hardships Americans are beginning to experience over high gas prices, should exploration in ANWR even be an issue? ANWR should have been opened for exploration as soon as gas hit $2 per gallon.

U.S. companies are barred from drilling off the coast of Florida because of environmental concerns. Yet, China signed an agreement with Cuba to drill for oil in Cuban waters. Since Cuba is only 90 miles from Florida, and Jimmy Carter, in his legendary witless "wisdom," gave Cuba half those waters for economic purposes, we could see oil rigs as close as 45 miles off Florida's shores.

Which means, we'll likely be the recipient of whatever environmental damage that might come out of drilling for oil near Florida, but China will be the recipient of the oil.

To add insult to injury, there are reports that China is planning to slant drill. That is, while in Cuban waters, they can slant drill to tap into our oil reserves.

So, we get the pollution, China gets the oil, and, on top of that, China gets our oil. What brilliant environmentalist sees this as a solution to anything?

The Florida shores should have been opened for drilling by U.S. companies the moment China signed an agreement with Cuba.

We have an oil crisis in the U.S. because of twisted priorities. It's one thing to worry about the environment when there's little or no downside. But when the downside is extreme hardship to the vast majority of Americans, environmental concerns, unless they're an obvious imminent threat to life or health, should be put aside.

The notion that there are moronic, dimwitted individuals and groups who are more concerned about the reindeer in Alaska than Americans on Main Street, is just mind-boggling.

Almost as bad is the passivity of the average American. TV interview after interview of people on the street who are asked what they think of the high gas prices, respond to the effect of, "Well, we'll just have to change our vacation plans," or "We'll have to cut down on" this or that. There seems to be no outrage over our lawmakers buckling under pressure from a small minority of special interest groups.

When a horse is killed accidentally in Central Park, there is immediate outrage by animal activists about changing laws to protect animals. (I'm an animal lover myself. I've had cats, birds, a dog, and other animals.) I certainly do not suggest condoning cruelty to animals. But when animals elicit more consideration and respect than humans, that's not a love of animals -- that's a distorted sense of reality and an irrational contempt for one's fellow human beings.

If average Americans gathered in front of their lawmakers' offices in support of "human rights," protesting environmental-related restrictions on oil exploration with the same outrage as some nuts scream for animal rights, we could have cheap gas in the near future. (When gas prices go down considerably and our economy gets back on track, we can start worrying again about the environment.)

Average Americans far outnumber the individuals who comprise environmental groups. If we let our voices be heard in support of "human rights," it will undoubtedly drown out the opposition.

To do with less when you don't have to, makes no sense. I'm all for conservation of energy, loose leaf paper and whatever, even when they're in abundant supply. But teaching conservation is one thing, imposing deprivation as another. We have plenty of oil, let's use it.

Nancy Pelosi needs to resign. She is not serving the people of this country. Most Americans, democrats and republicans alike, want more offshore drilling. Who is Nancy Pelosi to deny the American people that right?

We must rally in support of getting Nancy Pelosi removed from office.

by Josh Greenberger

Josh Greenberger: As a computer consultant for over two decades, has developed software for NASA's Goddard Institute of Space Studies, AT&T, Charles Schwab, Bell Laboratories and Chase Manhattan Bank. Has appeared, in the form of letters and articles, in The New York Post, New York Daily News, New York Times, Village Voice, Jewish Press, Hamodia and others. Articles have ranged from humor to scientific to current events. Wrote a book disproving the theory of evolution (Human Intelligence Gone Ape a.k.a. Who Let The Apes Out, available in stores and online. Has written several screenplays.








Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Josh Greenberger's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Robert Melaccio, Sr. (6,527)
Robert Melaccio, Sr.
(88 days 21 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Josh, it is all answered  in what they have done and what they have failed to do. A vote for any of them is vote for the same. Best Wishes, RTM

Respond to this comment

» left by Mr. Keith (1,766)
Mr. Keith
(85 days 18 hours ago.)

Clap, Clap, Clap, Clap, Clap

You said it great!

Now how do we get rid of the bum!!!!!

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (83 days 2 hours ago.)
Not sure how to get rid of her. I just hope this country is still around by the time we vote here out of office.

Respond to this comment

» left by Joel Hendon (4,245)
Joel Hendon
(67 days 9 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great article Josh and right on the button. Unfortunately, it appears that her constituents cannot see her lack of intelligence and responsibility. All the rest of us can do is vote for congressmen who will tangle with her and try to force her to have a little sense. She has already said that she is now the most powerful woman in America. Someone needs to slap her powerful face.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (66 days 2 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
how can we work at getting rid of nancy pelosi?

Respond to this comment

» left by Wayne Good from Nevada (60 days 7 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 1.5 out of 5
Yes helpful. When can we vote her out? Also Reid from NV needs to be voted out special interest money is controlling this country Not the Public. Wrong. Please also post fast legal way for general public to revolt against this behavior.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (60 days 6 hours ago.)
"post fast legal way for general public to revolt against this behavior"
 
Don't know that. I was hoping someone reading this would know.
 
You can start, though, by calling her office at 202-224-3121 and simply ask her to comply with the will of the American people.

Respond to this comment

» left by JOHN HARDY from CALIF. (55 days 22 hours ago.)
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid ( along with Obama ) are the most dangerous people in the country.

Respond to this comment
» left by Anonymous (20 days 5 hours ago.)
I couldn't agree more.  These people should be ashamed of themselves.  Don't get me wrong i'm not happy with the republicans right now either but the bottom line is they're all failing and Nancy and Reid are leading the failure pack.
 
Please be sure to let them know directly by emailing them.  I'm not able to paste a link in here but do a google search for "CAGW porker of the month"
 
There you can send an email to her and Reid
 
Send them notes to let them know how you feel!!

Respond to this comment

» left by Kii Kynzer (330) (50 days 18 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Thank you for writing this.  I wrote an article on this subject, but you are very good at reasoning.  We do need to IMPEACH Pelosi, if that is possible for her "throwing to the curb" the interest of the American people.  According to Foxnews this past week she made $250,000. in investments betting on high oil prices.  That is deplorable behavior.  Well written article.

Respond to this comment
» left by Anonymous (50 days 13 hours ago.)
When I wrote this article I had no idea that Nancy Pelosi was benefitting from drilling restriction. Now that it's coming out, it seems there's something wrong with our laws.

A judge cannot over on a case in which only one person is involved when there's a conflict of interest. Yet a decrepit woman like Pelosi can make policies that effect hundreds of millions of people, although there's an obvious conflict of interest.

Something has to be changed here. One woman is ruining our country.

Thanks for your response.


Respond to this comment
» left by Anonymous (50 days 13 hours ago.)
Sorry, I forgot my name on that response - Josh Greenberger

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 290 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Tuesday, July 08, 2008
View other articles written by Josh Greenberger (936)


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Gas $1.50/gal. If We Use Alaska's Oil!!

3 Phase Converters

Libya: Petroleum Taxation & Royalty Risks for IOCs

Go Green, Save Energy and Money by Turning Off Your Computer Equipment

Nuclear Vs Fossil Fuels

America's Top Ten Ways To Decrease the Threat of Terrorism for Dummies

A Large Price to Pay for a Gallon of Gasoline

Have High Oil Prices Hurt Big Oil?

Does T. Boone Pickens Have A Personal Agenda?

Nancy Pelosi, Congress and High Gasoline Prices

Home  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright ? 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company