Writers' Community!
Home News Business Science & Technology Life
Front Page Page Two Columnists Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,564 Authors
48,447 Quality Articles
& 6,779 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
David Tanguay (7,555)
Ira Coffin (897)
Joel Hendon (4,850)
Terry Mitchell (2,785)
Rob Lafferty (123)
Arlene Wright-Correll (10,108)
Jane Bullard (1,959)
Avis Ward (13,445)
Richard Nicastro (2,545)
Dianne Lehmann (3,112)
Mogama (12,156)
Mike Fak (6,887)
David Pekrul (710)
Sara O'Rourke (401)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Obama's Solution To Eliminate Unemployment

And now Britian needs a Dynamic Leader!

To Preserve, Protect, and Defend

The Last Debate

I'd Like Three Men For President

Mr. Deeds Where are You?

McCain Considering Conceding Election Soon

A Stark Contrast

Prediction: An Uncontested Win for Barack Obama

Qualifications And Duties Of The President Of The U.S.

Home » Categories » Government » President / Prime Minister » Malicious and Stupid » Printer Friendly

John Sammon

Malicious and Stupid

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by John Sammon
Submitted Saturday, August 23, 2008
John Sammon (2,287)
John Sammon

Sammonsays
Log in to become a member of John Sammon's Fan Club!


I can’t figure out if George Bush’s stupidity is malicious, or just the innocent bumblings of a genuine simpleton, a true Cro-Magnon primitive.

You can tell by looking at the shape of his head he isn’t very bright. Bush and his African American token Lisa Rice (he picked her despite her incompetence because her color would diffuse the widely understood notion that the Republican Party is racist), signed a deal with Poland to put missiles in that country.

Of course, Russia was infuriated by this. Bush and Rice refer to the missiles as “defensive," indicating both their naiveté and their “moronic" inclinations.

Bush evidently thinks this move, arming Poland, will make us all safer. He doesn’t read books. He doesn’t learn. He doesn’t know any better. He doesn’t know history.

World War One resulted because the powers in Europe all had binding treaties with each other in a spider web of guarantees to come to each others’ defense (really offense) if any of their small allies were attacked.

They turned each other into armed camps.

Thus, if one small country in the Balkans attacked another small country, the big countries were automatically required to enter the fray, widening it into an uncontrollable world-wide conflict. This prevented the localizing of the war (keeping it small).

Bush and his stooge Rice are doing this. It’s a repeat of 1914.

Rice said, “Poland would be considered (defended) as if it’s US soil." Brilliant Rice! When you’re stupid enough to say any attack anywhere on anybody is a direct attack on me, you limit your ability (flexibility) to prevent war. Not the other way around. Learn from 1914.

Bush can’t learn. He isn’t capable of it.

Hey wait a minute! This is also a repeat of 1962.

The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. In reverse. For those of you too young to remember, the Russians in 1962 tried to import missiles into Cuba 90 miles from Florida. Then-President John Kennedy told the Russians this was unacceptable. The world came to within an inch of nuclear World War Three before the Russians backed down under the threat of US military confrontation and had the missiles removed.

Now this jingo idiot (Bush) and his token stooge (Rice) are doing the same thing in reverse. How would you feel if you were Russia and the world’s reigning superpower was arming all the little (formerly Russian) breakaway satellite countries on your borders, like Georgia? Wouldn’t you feel threatened, encircled, and paranoid? (The same dysfunctional feeling Germany and Russia felt in 1914).

For decades, presidents have been trying to disarm the world (by treaty, not war), to make war less likely. Bush is doing the opposite.

America is the most hypocritical country in the world. We arm everyone to buy their friendship like a bribe. All the while professing peace and accusing countries we don’t like of building their own weapons of mass destruction. We build weapons like mad and ship them. We then attack other countries based on false evidence they have weapons, but are angered whenever other countries follow our bad example and do what we do… attacking countries they don’t like.

We don’t lead by example. We hold ourselves to a different set of double standards.

Bush is mad. He and his sycophant (Rice) have brought the world a step closer to Armageddon. When will we finally be rid of this man, this mediocrity who always makes the wrong choice? How much more damage can he do before his term is up?

I can’t understand why the American people (twenty percent of them, the ones with flags on their cars), turn a blind eye, and let Bush do this and get away with it.

Maybe they’re as stupid as he is.

Bush is the worst president in American history.

© Copyright 2008 by SammonSays.com





Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of John Sammon's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Anonymous (98 days 17 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
Without a doubt this is the most ignorant uneducated rant I've ever read on Searchwarp.

Respond to this comment
» left by Anonymous (98 days 17 hours ago.)
 
 
Thank you Mr. all-Republicans good-everybody-else-bad. As Harry Truman once said, I don't give people hell, I just tell them the truth. To some people, the truth is hell.
 
If I've offended you, then my job here is done.
What is your education? In World War One, what was the famous "blank check"?
(Don't look it up on the internet).
 
 
JS
JS

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (98 days 15 hours ago.)
 
 
Here's another rant for you. The United States is the world's largest weapons exporter (Wikipedia).

Respond to this comment

» left by James P Krehbiel (1,443)
James P Krehbiel
(98 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
John,
 
Indeed, I think George W. will be viewed as the worst president in history for many different reasons. It is not merely the Democrats who feel this way, but Republicans as well. I think that writing anonymous comments show a lack of integrity. If you don't agree with an author, show some b--lls and stand up and be identified! Thanks.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (96 days 3 hours ago.)
 
 
The Russians are re-arming their Baltic Fleet in response to Bush's action.
 
 
John Sammon

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 63 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Saturday, August 23, 2008
View other articles written by John Sammon (2,287)
John Sammon


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Qualifications And Duties Of The President Of The U.S.

Would you nominate Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State, to run as President?

Sex, Lies, and Video Tape -- Hillary Should Pack Up Her Blue Dress and Go Home – Where Ever Home Might Be

Obama's Solution To Eliminate Unemployment

If Barack Obama is the Black Candidate is John McCain the Republican Woman Candidate?

What the First Quarter Fundraising Numbers Mean

Department Of Peace? Why Not?

Reasons Why People are Anti Bush

George Bush, Cheney and Libby -- Benedict Arnolds of the Proto-Fascist Republican Triad

The Destroying Of A President... And A Nation

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company