Alistair Owens(28) keen2learn Log in to become a member of Alistair Owens's Fan Club!
Government educational policies striving to improve standards are constantly criticised. If the pass rate improves it's down to easier exams, and if they deteriorate it's due to the wrong teaching resources or technique. But the rate of change in the now global markets is placing different demands on the educational content. Are we matching the output with the actual demand?
In the space of 10 years the world as we know it can change dramatically. The educational games and teaching resources in the schooling content seen as essential at the start of a decade can be almost irrelevant at the end. So are we programming the right curriculum for our children as they start their 10 year schooling journey or are we just muddling through a series of fire fighting policies.
Remember Y2K ? The 1st of January 2000. The world was scheduled to stop revolving, lifts to jam mid floor, bank accounts freeze and computers implode. The computer gurus had overlooked the implications of the date code of the new millennium. Suddenly we were desperately short of ICT personnel to rewrite operating programs and manufacturers to build new computers, servers and networks. The world at large joined in the furore, angst and paranoia.
The hot ticket career in ICT reacted to a demand that nobody foresaw. Inflated salaries, bonuses and a massive workload reflected what turned out to be misjudged panic. Thankfully Y2K passed like a damp squib. The world managed to continue to spin controlled by clocks and computers that continued to work. But there were huge economic consequences. Operating budgets were raided, projects cancelled as funds for replacement computers and services were rushed into place. Teaching resources budgets that normally covered educational games were decimated. And then.nothing.
Hardware manufacturers had a ball. Everyone had the latest specification computer, ICT guys had earned a fortune. But the bubble burst. The demand evaporated and the market flooded with skilled ICT professionals looking for a job.
Doubtless we have learned something from this maelstrom. Since Y2Y we have seen the centre of gravity in ICT support moving to Bangalore, manufacturing to China and possibly the Financial Services market to Frankfurt? We need to reprogramme our teaching resources so children can meet the changing demands of a global market. Matching the future needs in the curriculum is complex, and critically, would require decisions a decade in advance.
In the meantime we see continuing conflict in the performance of our National Curriculum. A huge number of children in primary school fall short of reaching an acceptable level in maths, English and ICT. The problem is passed to secondary school where teachers, already stressed, attempt to correct shortcomings as well as meet their own standards and targets. Perversely, success in exams is tempered with concern they have become too easy. GCSE's are criticised by the Confederation of British Industry that their content fails to meet the demands of the modern commercial world. The DCSF and OFSTED wail, gnash their teeth, change policy and muddy the water.
The government have announced changes to the GCSE. Designed to encourage children and provide a better chance of success, on the surface the syllabus is to be brought up to date and coursework will become modular. But this laudable intention has met with an immediate backlash; schools claim their workload will become intolerable as they try to meet the demands of children at varying stages of progress and attainment. Critics claim it would be impossible for the children not to gain good grades. But is the final outcome for the children ideally matched to the career market they are to enter?
Change will always induce reluctance, yet if we do nothing then nothing will change. Forty years ago the pace of change was more regulated. Children had some idea of a career in mind when selecting GCSE and "A" levels. Engineers went for physics, accountants for maths, doctors for the sciences. Today the changing employment options have left children with less focus. Historic careers have vaporised or can radically change within the schooling journey e.g. the Y2K syndrome and global market forces in manufacturing. Without specific career objectives children are bound to select subjects on their exam success potential. Maybe we should assess children for their likely career potential at an earlier stage to help programme their educational journey more efficiently. Pundits from the respective industry should be involved in the curriculum planning such that the syllabus incorporates developing techniques.
The World Wide Web, email and computers revolutionised communications in the space of 10 years. We are intimately aware of environment issues. Global warming, animal migration and climatic changes are all in state of flux. We need to consider what teaching resources are best suited to the educational objectives that meet this fast evolving world.
Alistair Owens believes education should be fun and use technology to meet the needs of commerce, industry and the environment of tomorrow. Teaching resources in the form of educational games and toys use technology to enthuse and make learning fun at school and home. Educational games using modern technology are already helping to teach children in school and at home. You can see examples here ttp://www.keen2learn.co.uk/l/64/ICT_Games.php
Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or
Question:
This Article has been viewed 19
times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Thursday, September 04, 2008 View other articles written by Alistair Owens(28)
If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:
Disclaimer: All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any
information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional
or organization.
