Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 7,783 Authors
70,503 Quality Articles
& 7,290 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Sandra E. Graham (7,883)
Mogama (15,965)
Bruce Horst (142)
Joel Hendon (16,285)
Michael Ramzy (633)
E. Raymond Rock (3,068)
Ira Coffin (6,669)
Connor Davidson (5,131)
Ben Morrish (7,936)
Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Fran Larson (2,271)
Shari Vaudo (418)
David Tanguay (9,577)
Missing Link (766)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Conservatives Have One Good Reason to be Frustrated

Reaction to Thesis is Quite Telling

Lie, Cheat and Steal

A visit to 2032

Pray for Your Leaders

I'm confused

Letters To Lindsey

My Song

The View From The Right - April 9, 2009

Giving Limbaugh A Second Look

Home » Categories » Government » Conservatism » Conservatives Will Vote for John McCain Anyway; Here is Why » Printer Friendly

Mogama

Conservatives Will Vote for John McCain Anyway; Here is Why

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Mogama
Submitted Wednesday, October 08, 2008
Mogama (15,965)
Mogama

http://mogama.com
Log in to become a member of Mogama's Fan Club!


In a previous article, I highlighted 8 reasons proving that John McCain looks more like a Democrat than a Republican. For practical purposes, Senator McCain is a Democrat in disguise.

That is one of the main reasons why the senator's presidential race with Barack Obama remains a close one. He's running as a moderate Democrat, similar to what Hillary Clinton did during the latter part of the primary election season. By the way, former President Bill Clinton used the same strategy; he ran as a moderate Democrat.

Worse than being a Democrat impostor, Senator McCain has been consistently bashing and blasting President Bush, the real conservative and current standard bearer of the Republican Party. McCain is running against Bush, as though Bush were his opponent or enemy. As one who voted for President Bush, the "compassionate conservative", I really have a problem with McCain's  angry Bush bashing.

So, if McCain is more like a Democrat, and he's dumping on the Republican President Bush, why are millions of conservative Republicans gearing up to vote for this man, rather than holding him accountable for betraying his party and conservative principles, and turning on the leader of his own party under the cover of "maverick"? Here are some reasons...

1. Conservative voters have talked themselves into the "lesser of two evils" philosophy. McCain is a lesser evil than Obama. What a smooth way to compromise your core principle!

2. Conservatives don't want to be branded "single-issue voters". They've believed conservative radio talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity that, in the 2008 elections, winning is everything. Even if we conservatives have to vote for an alien, let's do so; at least that's not Obama.

3. Conservatives have nowhere else to go, short of not voting at all. But if you really stand for principle, shouldn't you be able to do just that some times? Or at least, you should vote for a third-party candidate, who may not win, but you would have not sold your soul in the name of voting the party line. Whatever happened to "our conservative principles"?

4. Conservatives are betting on McCain for the sake of judicial appointments. They have convinced themselves that John McCain will appoint "strict constructionists", who will "interpret the constitution", not "legislate from the bench". That means pro-life judges, of course. Good talking points, but how do they know McCain will keep his campaign promise on this? If the man has flip flopped on numerous issues before, who's to say he won't do so when it comes time to appointing judges?

5. Many conservatives will vote McCain, because they say Obama is "Muslim", which may be code for "He's black." (Check out the article, "6 Other Ways to Say 'He's Black'.) These conservatives' fear of or hatred for Obama drives them into the arms of McCain, who is actually ashamed to be lumped together with conservative Republicans, except for their votes come elections day.

6. Millions of conservative voters are hoping that a vote for John McCain is actually a de facto proxy ballot for Sarah Palin, the true conservative. These conservatives see McCain as merely a front, a figurehead, the shortest route to electing President Sarah Palin. Now, they may be onto something there, when you take Senator McCain's age and health into account. If elected, it is likely McCain may not serve out his term(s), and when that happens, the conservative grassroots will get their big wish of keeping the White House.

For these and other reasons, our conservative fellow citizens don't mind leaving this country in the hands of the party that has brought us this low, with our international reputation in the trash bin, our economy in the dumps, our president having no clue of how to fix any of it.


Born in Liberia, West Africa. Migrated to America in 1991. Motivational speaker. Spiritual leader. Life Coach. Writer/Author. Blogger. Founder of Church For All. Website, mogama.com.
       
 


Mogama Featured Author on SearchWarp!


Mogama Top 100 Author on SearchWarp!


Mogama Featured Columnist at SearchWarp!








Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Mogama's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by JL from US (1 year 5 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Mogama, interesting article, but I believe you are stereotyping. Must all conservative voters agree with everything a candidate says or believes? If that is the criteria by which they are judged, then the same criteria must be given to a liberal voter.
 
By saying that some conservatives have a dirty little secret and are racist is a pretty racist statement. It matters not what my race is, or the race of the candidate. My first choice for President would be JC Watts, my second Mike Huckabee. Blanket statements as you presented add fuel to the racism fire in this country.
 
If you will take the time to ask, you will find that fewer conservatives listen to Rush and Sean than you believe. I am conservative and know many conservatives, none of which listen to either one of them. Another assumption on your part. Sounds like you may be listening to a lot of media opinions.
 
I am hoping the next president appoints judges that place a higher value on human life than on the egg of an eagle or the prebble field mouse. You make "pro-life" sound like a curse word. I don't belive Roe v Wade will ever be reversed, nor do I believe that abortion is OK.
 
Obama and Ayres did serve on some of the same boards, but that doesn't mean they agree on all things political. It doesn't mean they don't either. It just means that in this life you have to be careful of the company you keep. If you don't some republican, democrat, or independant will be sure and label you. One of the biggest gripes us conservatives have with Obama is an old one. You've heard it before. It is Obama's ties to his church. I go to church. I hear what my pastor says. He encourages me to look for myself and see what the Scripture says. I remember what is taught and if I didn't agree with it, I'd be going to another church. Does Obama believe what his pastor teaches? Or is he too much of a sheep that he can't make up his own mind? Or, maybe he has a few buddies there that he doesn't want to leave? Who knows. But if a man or woman of any other race was associated with that kind of hatred for that long of a time, would you want him to be your president?

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (14,969)
Mogama
(1 year 5 days ago.)

It's a good thing to read your comments, JL. Yes, there's some stereotyping in my article, but there's more truth than you may admit. On Barack's church, for those who care to look deeper than meets the eye, it's quite evident that he went to that church for political reasons, the same reason so many career politicians attend churches. They hardly believe what their priests or pastors preach. In fact, some of these politicians/parishioners publicly contradict their church doctrine, yet they keep attending those churches. For example, how many Catholic politicians believe the Vatican's stance on abortion and birth control? Do those Catholics leave their churches because they disagree with their priests? No! But Barack should vacate his church, because he and his pastor are not on the same page? You are holding Barack to a standard that normally does not apply to others. Another thing you may want to acquaint yourself with is Black Liberation Theology, which is a brand of theology that some black pastors, like Rev. Wright, ascribe to. It is hard for you to relate to that kind of preaching unless you empathize with those whose background includes slavery, segregation, and injustice of the grossest kind. Such people may preach, sing and speak differently than others. I hope you understand my point, but if you don't, I understand that too. ~mogama~
Respond to this comment

» left by Zeambo Dahnweih (48) (1 year 4 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
I agree with you, Mogama, that for the most part Republicans will vote McCain. I also think that Dems would do the same for their party.
 
I also concur with you that Republicans are stuck with McCain. I'm sure most Republican voters would have done better in the primary elections had they foreseen that McCain would be the party's nominee.
 
And yes, electing McCain could be a springboard to a possible Palin presidency, given the former's age and the likelihood that the latter could run on her own merits in the next election as most VP's do. The question is, Would she win? And how about the interview enigma? I can't imagine a president who grants interviews only to networks sympathetic to her party. She has a steep uphill battle.
 
And to JL, the brother who commented earlier: You asked a question I consider redundant: "Does Obama believe what his preacher teaches?" It is redundant because Obama has answered this question numerous times. He does believe some of what Rev. Wright says and is opposed to some of it. And you know you have heard this said many times before (perhaps using others words). Only people who would have never voted for Obama in the first place would keep surfacing this issue.
 
As a former resident of Chicago, I visited the Trinity United Church of Christ a few times myself. Although I do not subscribe to all his doctrines, Rev. Wright is one of my favorite preachers. The church does not teach hatred. It does, however, frown on social injustice, something I believe every church should be doing. Now Rev. Wright's choice of words may be a little forward and poignant to some, but he's not a bad guy. But for the purpose of your vote, I would caution you to be objective, if at all that is possible.
~Zeambo~

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (14,969)
Mogama
(1 year 2 days ago.)

Thanks, Zeambo, for your insightful remarks. You always bring light to the darkness. ~mogama~
Respond to this comment

» left by jennifer cuddy (1 year 3 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 4.5 out of 5
I don't see much wrong with a Black Liberation Theology for African Americans. There is no question that blacks have been oppressed in this country, and they should seek to excel beyond it. After having worked at Johns Hopkins ER in Baltimore, it is my opinion that many blacks suffer from chronic low self esteems, which perpetuates drug abuse and poverty ( as this does also in whites, but is very apparent in cities like Baltimore or Detroit.) I'm all for anything that promotes the ethnicity of the African Americans to a positive and gives them a sense of pride and unity. Why not? Jewish people have been ethnocentric for hundreds of years, yet no one chides them for that.
 
And as for reparations: hell yes, the African Americans deserve reparations just as the Native Americans do!

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (14,969)
Mogama
(1 year 3 days ago.)

What a breath of fresh air, Jennifer! I have a white friend who says, "Why should I be asked to pay reparations, when I had nothing to do with enslaving blacks? Should I be held accountable for what my foreparents did?" It's hard to explain to my buddy that he has benefited from slave labor, and therefore his tax money should help pay for slave labor. Thanks for your wise comments. ~mogama~
Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 253 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 10/8/2008 1:25:32 PM.
View other articles written by Mogama (15,965)
Mogama


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Lie, Cheat and Steal

Reaction to Thesis is Quite Telling

Conservatives Will Vote for John McCain Anyway; Here is Why

Examining Causality: Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals?

My Definition Of A Liberal

Open Letter to John McCain

How Right is Your Conservative Commentator

Giving Limbaugh A Second Look

Sarah Palin: A Pit Bull in Geek Sheik?

Conservatives Have One Good Reason to be Frustrated

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.023.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company