Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,696 Authors
48,542 Quality Articles
& 5,083 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Robert Melaccio, Sr. (6,290)
Joel Hirschhorn (383)
Susan Thom (8,666)
David Pekrul (423)
Avis Ward (9,631)
Tex Norman (4,196)
Jeff Brown (7,770)
Danny Davids (15,728)
Creative Blogger (6,688)
Krystal Kuehn (635)
David Tanguay (7,715)
Lee Baucom (304)
Terry Mitchell (2,717)
Ronyae (154)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
The blatant Hypocrisy of UK TV show 'Miss Naked Beauty'

I`m a Celebrity Get Me out of Here - Who is The Bookies Hot Favourite to Take the Crown

Reality TV - I`m a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here Jungle Winner 2008 is King Who?

Breaking Into Hollywood - How Do I Pitch a Reality Show?

Stay Away From MTV: The Absolute Worst Music Videos Ever

Watch One Tree Hill online

The advantage of 100hz or 200hz TV

Infomercials Bargains or Scams

We Are Family: The Most Popular Families In TV History

Dancing with the Stars 2 Results

Home » Categories » Entertainment » Television » Shock Jock Howard Stern Claims Voters Involved In Political Race War » Printer Friendly

Alf Gordon

Shock Jock Howard Stern Claims Voters Involved In Political Race War

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Alf Gordon
Submitted Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Alf Gordon (1,236)
Alf Gordon


Log in to become a member of Alf Gordon's Fan Club!


When I hear the name "Howard Stern" I think of rude, obnoxious, offensive, and whatever that one movie was that he made that did so incredibly well in theaters (yeah, right).  When I combine that name with the phrase "presidential candidates" I imagine Stern presenting a diatribe against the candidate he does not support.  So imagine my surprise when I was directed to a YouTube audio where Stern is attacking, not the candidates, but the voters.

Stern claims that it's useless to discuss politics with most people, as "99 percent of people don't know what the **** they're talking about."  To prove his point, Stern sent one of his staff members out to Harlem to interview African-American people about their choice of candidates for the Presidential election.  The interviewer, Sal Governale, asked people who they were planning on voting for and why.  The overwhelming choice for those interviewed was Barack Obama.  Governale then asked if they supported Obama's stand on several issues--except that he presented John McCain's position instead of Obama's.  Every person interviewed said that they agreed with the Democrat's stand on promoting pro-life, continuing the war in Iraq, preventing stem-cell research, and selecting Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential running mate.  Not one person stopped to correct Governale's claims; all blindly accepted the statements accurately reflected Obama's policies, when in fact Governale was presenting McCain's positions on these issues.

Is Stern insinuating, as some believe, that people are voting for Obama strictly because of his race and not because of his stand on the issues?  (He certainly wouldn't be the first person to do so.)  The last part of the audio discusses the Presidential race being more of a "race war", with one of Stern's staff admitting he felt he had to vote for Obama because if he didn't, he'd be voting "against his race."  However, in all fairness, Stern played a portion of an interview where Governale spoke with a staunch McCain supporter (also African-American).  The individual strongly supported McCain's position to pull out of Iraq, and approved McCain's choice of Joe Biden as vice-president (all of Obama's policies).

In a blog discussing the video, one individual commented that Stern is out to attack the African-American community, and is trying to make them look stupid.  Unfortunately that doesn't explain the large numbers of voters of other races who also plan on casting their vote for Obama in November; nor does it explain those African-Americans who believe McCain is the better choice.

Is Stern right on this one?  Or is this just his way of garnering more listeners and a bigger market share?  You can hear the video clip here and make up your own mind.  (Be forwarned: This IS Howard Stern, and the language on his show becomes quite coarse at times.)  Does Stern have a finger on the pulse of America, or is he just giving America the finger?
 





Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Alf Gordon's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Walter Rhett (3,375) (34 days 1 hour ago.)
Reader Rating: 3.5 out of 5
If Stern did the reverse--presented Barack's positions as McCain's--would those "supporting" him be doing so becase McCain is white? The real point is voters have low interest, short attention spans, an absense of passion, and a lack of clarity about local or national issues!

Respond to this comment
» left by Alf Gordon (1,236)
Alf Gordon
(34 days ago.)

In this case, Walter, obviously not, as the example in the article clearly shows.  It's difficult to tell where Stern is going with this one.  He and his staff imply that race is an issue, but interviewed only enough people in Harlem to help shore up their argument.  I would have liked to see him go to other places in New York with this experiment to see what the results were.  I would tend to agree with you, Walter, that most people wouldn't notice that "their" candidate had "the other guy's" policies.

Respond to this comment

» left by robert melaccio sr. (32 days 19 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Alf a great artcile but in this election since when did facts matter? I have to agree by nature of my own survey, which is conducted daily in the checkout line, the hospital waiting room and the like and the net result time after time, "The Easter Bunny". I have found that out the hard way. I used to think people weigh and reason I have now found that was all my mistake.

Respond to this comment
» left by Alf Gordon (1,236)
Alf Gordon
(28 days 2 hours ago.)

Thanks for the gracious comments, Robert.  Too many people are so caught up in the hype of this being an historic election that issues no longer seem to matter.  It's sad, really.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 372 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Tuesday, October 14, 2008
View other articles written by Alf Gordon (1,236)
Alf Gordon


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Reality TV - I`m a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here Jungle Winner 2008 is King Who?

The blatant Hypocrisy of UK TV show 'Miss Naked Beauty'

I`m a Celebrity Get Me out of Here - Who is The Bookies Hot Favourite to Take the Crown

When Will Naruto End?

Breaking Into Hollywood - How Do I Sell My Own Reality TV Show?

Seinfeld: The Top 10 Memorable Seinfeld Quotes Ten Years On.

Hip-Hop vs America or The Media vs America

The Differences between Anime and Cartoon

Reality Television - Educational or a Waste of Time?

Reality TV – If the Real World Was Like “Real World”

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company