Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,202 Authors
71,993 Quality Articles
& 7,297 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Joel Hirschhorn (2,847)
Ira Coffin (13,580)
Yangki Christine Akiteng (131,850)
Connor Davidson (5,541)
Mark Parsec (16,631)
Julian Price (12,254)
Michael Ramzy (821)
Edward Rhymes (9,204)
Dianne Lehmann (5,838)
Fran Larson (20,012)
Gregory Lewis (1,456)
Joel Hendon (18,567)
Sandra E. Graham (9,984)
Shari Vaudo (1,123)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Democracy Vs Benefits

How To Create More Jobs America

Where are the Windmills?

More jobs lost

Depressing Economic Pain

Letter I sent to my two Maine Senators

What Cash For Clunkers?

Change - Never Going To Happen

"War is not Healthy for Children and Other Living Things"

TARIFFS: The Smoot-Hawley Fairy Tale

Home » Categories » Government » Economic Issues » Should We Bail Out the Big Three? » Printer Friendly

Terry Mitchell

Should We Bail Out the Big Three?

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Terry Mitchell
Submitted Monday, November 24, 2008
Terry Mitchell (5,334)
Terry Mitchell

http://commenterry.blogs.com
Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!


I don't think taxpayers should be forced to bail out Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors. They got themselves into their present predicament thanks to poor management, low quality products, aversion to modernization, and too much deference to the powerful United Auto Workers union. Now, does that mean we should allow the Big Three go under? No, that would not be in our best interest. Their demise would create a ripple effect that would likely result in hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs being lost. Still, I think a little blood-letting is in order for the Big Three at this time.

What the federal government should do is grant them a special form of Chapter 11 bankruptcy which would include some incremental loan guarantees that would ensure that they emerge from it as stronger companies. However, there would be a catch. These three companies – including their boards of directors, stockholders, management, unions, employees, and retirees – would have to agree to some serious restructuring.

Their boards of directors would need to agree to steer their companies in the direction of higher quality and more fuel-efficient vehicles – along with the implementation of measurable goals to gage their progress toward this end. Their stockholders would have to agree to forfeit any dividends for a period of at least five years. All levels of their management, including their CEOs, would have to agree to severe limitations on their salaries and stock options.

Their unions, especially the UAW, would have to agree to a rollback of much of the power and influence they've gained over the years. Their rank-and-file employees would have to agree to cuts in hourly wages and benefits. Retirees would have to concur with similar decreases in pensions and benefits. Those who took early retirement and are still younger than 60 (and are not disabled) would have to accept even deeper cuts in pensions and benefits.

The current dire straits of the Big Three could well turn out to be a blessing in disguise instead of a disaster. It all depends on how our elected representatives in Washington respond. Bailing them out would not be the right thing to do, but allowing them to be hoisted on their own petard is obviously not the answer either. Putting them under a special form of Chapter 11 bankruptcy, as I have suggested, may be the solution. If nothing else, it would bring the days of multi-million-dollar CEOs and $50-an-hour assembly line workers to a close for the U.S. auto industry.
 

Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, amateur political analyst, and blogger from Virginia, USA. He posts a least one article a day to his blog - http://commenterry.blogs.com - on subjects such as current events, politics, technology, society and culture, religion, health and well-being, self improvement, personal finance, trivia, and sports.
 
You can now have any article and blog post he writes – in advance, if you would like – for use in your book, newspaper, magazine, ezine, newsletter, website, or whatever!! This includes the thousands of articles and blog posts he's previously written. Contact him via this website or his blog for details.   



Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!

Comments on this article: (2 total)


» left by Jennifer Cuddy (339 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
I think your stipulations for the CEO's and fuel efficent vehicle production is a good idea, but I don't see why the unions should have to suffer. In fact, if anyone should be bailed out, it should be the workers in danger of losing their jobs, pensions, etc..first.
 
However, because we are running out of oil very soon..I think the entire auto industry is in need of reform. Unfortunately, even if we all changed to hybrid cars, this still would only reduce energy consumption by only a quarter or so amount, so they say, but better than nothing. And it's a start. We need to change over to solar energy and electric cars post haste!

Respond to this comment

» left by Robert Melaccio, Sr. (5,177)
Robert Melaccio, Sr.
(336 days 6 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Ys Terry "Their unions, especially the UAW, would have to agree to a rollback of much of the power and influence they've gained over the years. Their rank-and-file employees would have to agree to cuts in hourly wages and benefits" Americans must learn to take less. Yes we trust management to us right [right to work states all over] Their program Terry, spelled out clearly for years by them and their new Global spead America everywhere dream. Fact Terry fact.  Now I do not condone some of these contracts and believ greed was involved and you are right perhaps fait is applicable, but here lies the root of it all. We do not even discuss National Security, no never, It is never included in anyone's discussion. You know maufacturing capabilty, industry, parts, vehicles, tanks? Do we  blindly "trust" our foreign friends to provide. Do you want to place your families well being into the hands of foreign powers? What am I getting at? Terry your wise enough to know.  Loan yes but not as we are doing with the banks, a free ride. Yes what you
are saying indirectly is low wages, limited benefits is acceptable. That says a lot about America today. I ask what about your kids and their future? Just questions and concerns. All the best this day. Sincerely

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 400 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 11/24/2008 6:57:04 AM.
View other articles written by Terry Mitchell (5,334)
Terry Mitchell


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Illegal Immigration: Pros & Cons

Regulate the Welfare Abuse

Banking Consolidation In Nigeria and the Strategies For Generating Better Returns

Impact of Energy On the Manufacturing Sector In Nigeria

Obama, Supply Side vs. Keynesian Economics

Why We Should Stop Foreign Aid.

Royal Bank of Scotland predicts U.S. currency collapse - three months

Government Rebates - Economic Stimulus Payments - Do You Qualify?

New Incentive to Spend Your Money----Obama's Cash For Clunkers Bill

Money is not Real, Not Really.

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.000.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company