Writers' Community!
Your are not logged in - Log in / Sign up

Featured Columnists Advice Columnists
Halls of Fame Q&A Contests Recent Things Polls NEW!
Contact Mogama Contact SearchWarp
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Join Us!


Now Serving 7,142 Authors
80,181 Quality Articles
& 8,798 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Yamileth Medina (1,414)
David Tanguay (10,958)
Suzy (1,097)
Joel Hirschhorn (2,924)
Leah Gray - Illustrator (13,994)
Linda DeWitt (2,030)
E. Raymond Rock (3,218)
Ronyae (3,957)
Joel Hendon (30,406)
Mogama (32,136)
Chris Cole (708)
Bob Alexander (2,014)
Dianne Lehmann (5,827)
Terry Mitchell (5,169)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
What Are We Waiting For?

How to Pray Article Series: Frequently Asked Questions About the Rosary, Novenas, and Fasting

How to Pray Article Series: What should you do when God seem silent?

How to Pray Article Series: Why Does God Seem To Be Silent At Times?

How to Pray Article Series: What are the Benefits of Praying with Other People?

How to Pray Article Series: Effectiveness of Praying with Others

Who/What Is IT and How Does IT Define Personal Happiness/Sexual Well-Being?

How to Pray Article Series: Should I Pray To Saints?

How to Pray Article Series: Should I Stop Praying for Prayers that are Not Answered?

How to Pray Article Series: Why Are My Prayers Not Answered? Part II

Home » Categories » Society » Religion and Spirituality » Rick Warren Correctly Answers "What Would Jesus Do?" » Printer Friendly

Mogama

Mogama's Random Rants

Mogama (32,136)
Mogama

Rick Warren Correctly Answers "What Would Jesus Do?"

Rated 4 out of 5
Rated 4.0 by 1 Reader ?
Submitted Sunday, December 21, 2008
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Mogama
http://debtfreedomclub.com
Log in to become a member of Mogama's Fan Club!

As long as Christians discuss the question, "What would Jesus do?" as a book title, as a thought, as an idea, as a theory about what it means to be like Christ, it's mighty easy to claim we really know what Jesus would do in every given situation.

But the answer to the question never ceases to rattle our religious cage once we see flesh and blood step forward and dare to actually do what Jesus would do. Whenever that happens, that embodiment of the real Jesus suddenly becomes a favorite target of attacks, criticisms and complaints.

In his unexpected friendship with Mr. Barack Obama, whom some call the most liberal politician to ever run for the American presidency, Pastor Rick Warren of Saddleback Community Church has become the latest public portrait of the true Jesus.

From every indication, Pastor Warren has chosen to stick to issues of morality without being stuck on political parties or personalities. The man is all about reaching and touching people in the spirit of Christ's love rather than throwing away the "sinner" with the bathwater of politicized Christian doctrine. Though Pastor Warren adamantly disagrees with Barack Obama on homosexual marriage and abortion, that has not stopped him from becoming friends with Obama. A news report says that Obama asked Warren to read the religion chapter of his book, The Audacity of Hope. Warren did Obama the favor.

Apart from reaching out to politicians who are not on the same page with him, Pastor Warren has also gone on record in his all-out efforts to devote time, energy, and enormous financial resources to people with HIV/AIDS, and to relieve poverty in a radical way. His outreach in African villages is second to none, as he provides clean water, medical services, and other tangible forms of compassion similar to the Jesus of the Gospels, who went about touching lepers, the AIDS patients of His day.

It was in that vein that on World's AIDS Day, December 1, 2006, Rick Warren welcomed Senator Obama to Saddleback Church to speak at Warren's "Global Summit on AIDS and the Church". Part of the event was for Obama to take an AIDS test at a news conference.

Then in August 2008, Warren interviewed both McCain and Obama at his church on moral issues, like abortion and homosexual marriage.

Pastor Warren is as staunchly pro-life as Obama is pro-abortion. But that has not stopped both men from continuing to be mutual friends.

It shocked homosexual activists that Obama asked Warren to pray at the president-elect's swearing in ceremony. And it enraged conservative evangelicals that Warren agreed to give the invocation at Obama's inauguration.

I can understand why the homosexual partisans are raving mad with Obama for inviting Warren, who publicly campaigned for Proposition 8 to amend California constitution in defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman. While the hostility from homosexual activists is understandable, it does more to reveal their own disguise as loving and compassionate. Liberal homosexual activists claim to be tolerant, yet they are among the angriest and most intolerant souls on the planet when someone like Rick Warren stands against their agenda. These guys show that "the church" does not have a monopoly on the game of hypocrisy.

As for the anger of evangelicals against Warren for accepting the invitation... Well my evangelical buddies continue to seal and sear their image as the modern equivalent of first-century Pharisees, who constantly pestered Jesus for hanging out with sinners. The Pharisees would rather shun sinners, condemn sinners to hell, or at least have Jesus consent to stoning sinners to death.

For example, when Jesus visited the home of Zacchaeus, the religious elites murmured, saying of Jesus, "He has gone to be a guest with a man who is a sinner'' (Luke 19:7).

If they were living today, the Pharisees would have probably said the same of Rick Warren: "He is going to give the invocation for a man who is pro-abortion and pro-homosexual."

On another occasion, as Jesus and His disciples were sharing a meal with "many tax collectors and sinners", the Pharisees took notice and asked Jesus' disciples, "Why does your Teacher eat with tax collectors and sinners?" (Luke 9:11).

Our contemporary Pharisees would say, "Why does Rick Warren speak in a friendly manner with liberal Democrats, homosexuals, Muslims, and people with AIDS?"

The answer Jesus gave those holier-than-thou Pharisees should provide Pastor Warren sufficient response to his evangelical critics, "Those who are well have no need of a physician, but those who are sick...For I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance" (Luke 9:12-13).

Translated: Traditional evangelicals and their followers do not need the gospel message that Rick Warren has to share; Barack Obama, homosexuals, Muslims, and people with HIV/AIDS do need Rick Warren and his authentic Jesus. Pastor Warren must go to where the sinners are.

You win souls the same way Jesus did: You talk to those you perceive to be "the lost". You eat with them. And yes, you can pray with or for sinners, like Pastor Warren is slated to do for Mr. Obama.

It should be noted that Pastor Warren, unlike traditional evangelicals, is even-handed in his friendship with or courtesy towards liberal and conservative politicians alike. Recently, his group awarded President George W. Bush a medal to honor the Republican president for his HIV/AIDS initiative. That reminds us of Jesus Christ, who befriended the despised Zacchaeus and the Samaritan woman as eagerly as he did respected Pharisees like Nicodemus and Simon.

Rick Warren is my kind of evangelical. Frankly, it will be a breath of fresh air for someone like Warren, along with the likes of Joel Osteen and T.D. Jakes, to become the new leadership for Evangelical Americana, in particular for those of us who are tired of and fed with the shameless, one-sided, and sometime very crude evangelical partisanship we've seen coming from traditional evangelicals in recent years.

What would Jesus do? Take a good look at Rick Warren. He lives the answer.



Mogama holds a Master of Divinity. He is a minister; author; life coach; freelance article writer; freelance blogger; manager of debtfreedomclub.com and mogama.info

Mogama Featured Author on SearchWarp!

Mogama Top 100 Author on SearchWarp!

Mogama Featured Columnist at SearchWarp!






Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Mogama's Fan Club!
Comments on this article:


» left by Terry Mitchell (4,876)
Terry Mitchell
(1 year 28 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Excellent article, Mogama! As you mentioned, Rick Warren is no extremist. The gay community is only shooting itself in the foot by reacting to him in such an intolerant manner. And it's outrageous for them (and many mainstream Democrats) to compare Warren to those who advocated slavery in 1800's. Like many on the right, these people ahere to the childish attitude that whoever is not completely for them is completely against them. Too bad.

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 28 days ago.)

You've captured the whole truth in your comment, "these people ahere to the childish attitude that whoever is not completely for them is completely against them." Thanks, Terry, for commenting.~mogama~
Respond to this comment

» left by Bruce Horst (697)
Bruce Horst
(1 year 28 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great article Mogama. I've been shaking my head in disbelief over the Christians criticizing Rick Warren over this issue.
 
As Christians I believe that we should do our best to influence the world around us for Christ, which is exactly what Rick Warren is doing. It seems that others would rather sit in the corner and complain.

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 28 days ago.)

Thanks, Bruce, for your comment. I wish I can do one-tenth of what Pastor Warren is doing for Christ. I'm praying for the Lord to use this brother even more. ~mogama~
Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (1 year 28 days ago.)
"...the shameless, one-sided, and sometime very crude evangelical partisanship we've seen coming from traditional evangelicals in recent years."
 
"...the anger of evangelicals against Warren for accepting the invitation... "
 
There were ten or twelve people given press time in order to perpetuate the idea evangelicals are "outraged" at Rick Warren, and you agree with the media's depiction of this event?
 
I have counseled a few young men that have all had the same argument: "This guy is saying all the right things, but doing worse things than I am...At least I am being honest about not wanting to go to church anymore due to the hypocritical things I have seen..."
 
I have asked each of them: "What about the 35 or 40 guys that aren't just talking about living and walking as Christ would, but they are doing it, too? Why can't you look at them instead of looking at the 4 or 5 guys that are hypocrites and basing your stereotype of all Christians on those 4 or 5 guys?"
 
The media, and this story, does the same thing...pasting an attitude of a few across a great number of people that do not share the attitude. This story uses sweeping accusations and stereotyping galore.
 
I would bet the number of people in Rick Warren's congregation alone outnumbers the number of Christians criticizing Rick's actions. There are certainly people in his congregation that disagree with him. However, there are many, many more people that agree with Rick Warren's actions.
 
As far as reaching out to the lost...this article paints a picture of the typical evangelicals and Christians as partisan, selfish, stubborn children. Any unbeliever reading this story is left to believe the author, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen and the two posters are part of the tiny percentage of Christians that do not fall into the "selfish children" category. This article accomplishes the media's agenda of depicting all Christians as out-of-date religious jackasses that nobody in their right mind should ever listen to.
 
Perhaps the author's experience is less optimistic than my own. In the congregation I belong to I would go so far as to say maybe only 1 to 3 percent of the congregation would disagree with the actions of Rick Warren, 5 to 10 percent wouldn't have an opinion one way or the other, but the remaining 85 percent of the congregation would agree with exactly what we are taught...we are defined as Christian when we display Christ's love to the world, and to other Christians...and Rick's actions are doing exactly that.
 
Michael

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 28 days ago.)

Thanks, Michael, for your comment. I agree with you that the vast majority of Christians singing from the same sheet of music as Pastor Warren. It's just that his vocal opponents are among the leaders of evangelicals, so their voices are magnified. Thanks for you and your people are being Christ to your community. Keep up the great work. ~mogama~

Respond to this comment

» left by Greg from Ontario, Canada (1 year 28 days ago.)
So, Rick Warren thinks he is Jesus Christ or at least he is put in that light by fellow christians, that's nice ? First, religion has no place in politics. It should have nothing to do with running the government, it is just another excuse to form predudice against our fellow man. A man's personal faith is his own business and I see no reason to preach it or force it on to others. I am not a liberal, in fact I believe we are taking liberalism over the top in Canada and America, we are losing our morality as a nation. I see comments saying that those on the right hold "childish attitudes" but be careful how far left you want to go before you enter into corrupt, immoral, immature behavior that we are seeing more and more today.

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 28 days ago.)

"...religion has no place in politics. It should have nothing to do with running the government..." I second the motion, Greg. But "religion" and Jesus Christ are not one and the same. It is impossible for anyone who truly follows Christ to keep Him out of the public square of that person's life. It will be like marrying someone but locking him/her up in a closet at home, because you're ashamed to be seen with the person in public. When Jesus and his teachings become your lifestyle, you can't practically divorce him from any area of your life. I'm glad Pastor Warren hasn't left Jesus out of his public life; many AIDS victims are thankful for Warren's outreach to them. ~mogama~

Respond to this comment
» left by Greg (1 year 27 days ago.)
Mogama,
I understand what you are saying, and I respect your faith in christianity. Christianity is Jesus Christ and christianity IS a religion. Religious beliefs are the root of man's prejudice towards others who happen to have a different belief. Here's what I don't understand, why can't man just treat others as he would like to be treated himself and forget about belonging to a religious group or tag. We don't need to worship anything or anyone to live the golden rule. No disrespect intended but christianity is based on Jesus Christ and the gospels which are no more historically accurate than Alice in Wonderland ! This all happened 2000 years ago and there was no clear record of what really took place, only the gospels and the "dead sea scrolls" which are full of contradictions. The Roman Catholic church has tried to preserve christianity in their own desparate ways and we all know how corrupt and hypocritical the RC church is, I'm sure there is no argument there ? Putting it bluntly, christianity could be based on a person or stories that didn't even exist. I think mankind has outgrown the need to worship myths and get on with living the golden rule to love one another and help one another regardless of race, colour, or religion.

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 27 days ago.)

Wow, Greg, you must really hate religion. It shows. What wisdom is it that dismisses the need for Christianity by referencing biblical concepts like "the golden rule" and "treat others as you would like to be treated"? What thinking brands Christianity as damaging to human goodness by being blind to the hospitals, homeless shelters, soup kitchens, schools, safe homes for children, colleges and universities started by Christians? What historical blindness it is to ignore the fact that the veracity of the Bible has been proven time and again by the science of archaeology and by the pinpoint of accuracy of Bible prophecy, which predicted the state of affairs that now exist in the world in terms of famine, pestilence (diseases), and wars? It's one thing to spew bigotry against religion in general and Christianity in particular, but it's hard to dismiss the trail of charity that followers of the real Jesus have given to the world. Could it be that someone you know have ever called a Church for assistance? That's the Jesus people, you know. I hope you'll extend to Christians and religious people the same love or the golden rule you preach. ~mogama~
Respond to this comment
» left by Greg (1 year 26 days ago.)
Mogama, I don't think you are taking what I am saying with an open mind. First, I do not "hate" anyone ! I am not "spewing bigotry" against christianity ! Do you think the ideal of the golden rule only comes from christianity ? Do you think only christians bring goodness to the earth or give to charities ? Do you think only christians have put forth prophecy that has come to pass ? Mogama, do you see your bias ? Also, your bible has no historical accuracy, it is made up of opinions and stories that have no factual truth. Now you can go around with a closed mind and dismiss everything I have said or you can see the world with your own eyes and not through only a christian's eyes. You don't need that crutch, it's a scam ! Mogama, you are a good, bright, fair man ! Don't get carried away with this Rick Warren, Jesus Christ comparison in this article. Instead of "What Would Jesus Do" , ask yourself What Would YOU Do ? I wish you and yours a very Merry Christmas !

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 26 days ago.)

Even secular history confirms there was an individual named Jesus of Nazareth. Most of the people, places, and even titles and positions named in the Bible have been verified by objective archaeologists.

If all I had was a theory or an argument, you would be right. But I have the evidence of a changed life based on an inner change that happened in my heart years ago. My life used to be one way, and I lacked the power to do the right things I wanted to do, then one night in 1982, by receiving Jesus Christ, I experienced a spiritual change that empowered

me to live right.

I have witnessed this same power turn the lives of my mother, drug addicts, drunks, and criminals around. I'm talking about people who have tried programs and other means to change but never did until they received Jesus as their Savior.

How can a scam inspire people to build schools and hospitals, to sacrifice their lives and resources, to move them to form charitable organizations that serve millions of people every day? Can you count how many charitable organizations like the Red Cross, United Way, and Salvation Army were in the world before Jesus Christ and His followers came along? Christians with hearts changed by the power of Jesus Christ were the first to spearhead such works of sacrificial love for others. Of course, others have copied their good examples through the centuries.

I do not deny some of the acts of ignorance, wars and other evils that some Christians have engaged in through the centuries. Such acts are clearly contrary to the faith and example of Jesus Christ. But a fair minded person would not dismiss Christianity based on some flawed examples that strayed from the Truth.

Without Jesus Christ and Christians, there would have been no America, and all the good that the United States, despite her shortcomings, have done in the world. You may be biting the very hands that have been feeding you, that have given you the civilization and opportunities that you now enjoy.

Just because you reject religion does not mean you don't have faith like religious people do. And it does not mean you possess superior intelligence. Your religion just happens to be different than ours. Your faith is humanism. You believe in yourself and in the ability of human beings. My experience has shown me that my faith deserves a greater object than me and others as frail and flawed. And I'm glad there's enough room on this planet for you and me with our divergent faiths.

Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays. ~mogama~
Respond to this comment
» left by Greg (1 year 24 days ago.)
Mogama, thanks for trying to analyze me but you are wrong. My belief is not humanism, it's spiritualism !  I have experienced the separation of the physical and the spiritual, and it is awesome, words cannot explain it. This is why I know the so called resurection of Jesus is another 'fable' from the bible, or perhaps a misinterpretation, because when the spirit rises the physical body remains. Anyway, I don't want to demean your religion any further, I was hoping to enlighten you but your belief is strong and stubbornly unyielding and that is fine, nothing wrong with that, in fact you are in the majority, I am the minority, for now. Mogama, not only is there room on this planet for you and me, there is room in the universe. I hope your Christmas was wonderful and the New Year even better !
 

Respond to this comment
» left by Jennifer Cuddy (945)
Jennifer Cuddy
(1 year 22 days ago.)

Quite the contrary Greg, the Bible is the most accurate document of any other ancient literary work that is known to man. And it is the most important and powerful piece of work that has ever been written to this day. None compare. None. Not even the Koran.

Respond to this comment
» left by Greg (1 year 21 days ago.)
Oh Jennifer !  Who told you that !? The bible is the most famous or well known book in the world but that doesn't make it accurate. The more we learn about the source or probable authors, the more fictional it becomes. Did you know that when the bible was assembled some books were left out or omitted because the content cast a poor light on the Roman Catholic church ? So, it is not even complete ! Anyway, I understand your passion Jenifer, to believe the bible is true and accurate, you are not alone, this theory has been drummed into us for centuries. Please don't try to convince me. Have a great day !

Respond to this comment
» left by jennifer cuddy (1 year 21 days ago.)
Yes, I am very well educated on the Council of Nicea. But your accusation is absolutely false. That was not the issue at all. But we can argue till the cows come home. It doesn't matter. The message is loud and clear and still intact. It is whatever you get out of it. If you can not see its tremendous beauty and complexity that has yet to ever be replicated, then I feel sorry for you.
 
May your mind have peace someday,
Jennifer

Respond to this comment
» left by Greg (1 year 21 days ago.)
Jennifer, please don't feel sorry for me, I am a very fortunate and grateful man. I do have peace of mind but you seem rather agitated ? I do not doubt your education, just your logic and reasoning of your argument. Why would anyone want to "replicate" the bible ? What does that prove ? It has "beauty and complexity", yes, so does Shakespeare ! You say "the message is loud and clear", well so is "Cinderella", but it is still fiction, just a story. Now, what you get out of the bible IS important, I agree with you there. Let's leave it at that. Peace be with you !

Respond to this comment

» left by James P Krehbiel (1,110)
James P Krehbiel
(1 year 27 days ago.)

Mogama,
 
You say, "Translated: Traditional evangelicals and their followers do not need the gospel message that Rick Warren has to share; Barack Obama, homosexuals, Muslims, and people with HIV/AIDS do need Rick Warren and his authentic Jesus. Pastor Warren must go to where the sinners are." Do you really mean this? All of the people list above constitute "sinners" in your religious worldview; and you, Rick Warren and other evangelical Christians WHO THINK LIKE YOU have the mind of Christ? Sounds like an exclusive club to me based on the hot button issues such as homosexuality and abortion. Want to throw polygamy in there?

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 27 days ago.)

No need to throw in polygamy, unless you want to marry that other woman! No, seriously. In the article, I'm responding to the evangelicals who are blasting Rick Warren for associating with "sinners". I'm using their language to make a point, though I don't shy away from saying homosexuality and abortion are sinful acts. I hope you are big enough to tolerate one who thinks differently from you, as I'm glad to extend to you that same freedom of expression. In fact, I know you are fair minded. ~mogama~
Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (4,876)
Terry Mitchell
(1 year 26 days ago.)

James, I guess you would have had a problem with Jesus when he said, "I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentence." He told this to the scribes and Pharisees who were complaining about him hanging around with the "bad" people of his day. Jesus implied these people needed him more than the highly religious folks did.
 
Likewise, Rick Warren is a follower of Jesus and is trying to follow in his footsteps. Evangelicals and other Christians don't need Warren as much as those who have little or no regard for the teachings of God's Word. I think that was Mogama's point. Of course, he's already answered for himself, but I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents worth as well.

Respond to this comment
» left by Mogama (43,809)
Mogama
(1 year 26 days ago.)

Yes, Terry, that's exactly what I was trying to get across. You say it much clearer than I could. Thanks for the help. ~mogama~

Respond to this comment
» left by Jennifer Cuddy (945)
Jennifer Cuddy
(1 year 22 days ago.)

It is you who has issues with the Church, James. These things have been considered sinful from the very beginning. Not even I would have dared to say that I was "Christian" when I was more liberal minded because of these things. But now, I can clearly see their point. Yes, the behaviour is is clearly condemned, and considered an abomination. This isn't new.

Respond to this comment

» left by jennifer cuddy (1 year 22 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
I thought it was very wise of Obama to choose Rick Warren. If anything the evangelists should be glad.
 
The homosexuals certainly do not "own" Obama, and his sympathy for them is not really a nod and a wink to their behaviour at all. Just a compassionate gesture of humanity.
 
I just saw the most atrocious movie called "Milk" that to me, showed homosexuals to be the most despical group of people, that it actually disgusted me. I left the film early, and for the life of me, could not decide whether or not the director was pro or against homosexuals. They were portrayed as utterly sleazy.

Respond to this comment

» left by Rabbi Stanley (1,807)
Rabbi Stanley
(1 year 22 days ago.)

This article just came out in one news now
 
Pastor Rick Warren, chosen by President-elect Barack Obama to pray at his inauguration, said in a video message to his church that he doesn't equate homosexual relationships with incest or pedophilia, but opposes redefining marriage just as any conservative Christian would.
 
 
Warren said that disagreeing with gay-rights activists on same-sex marriage does not qualify as hate speech and doesn't mean he is anti-gay. He said Obama chose him to give the invocation at the swearing-in to show that people with different views don't have to demonize each other.
 
 
"We're both willing to be criticized in order to try to bring America into a new day of civil discourse and to create a new model that says you don't have to agree only with your side on everything," Warren said in the video posted Monday night by Saddleback Community Church.
 
 
Gay-rights advocates were enraged that Obama had given the evangelical clergyman a prominent role at the Jan. 20 inauguration. Obama said he wanted the event to reflect diverse views and insisted he remains a "fierce advocate" of equal rights for gays.
 
 
Warren had backed Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in his home state of California, where he founded Saddleback. He had recently said that he opposed any redefinition of marriage, including a brother marrying a sister, or an adult marrying a child.
 
 
In his video, he insisted he wasn't equating gay marriage with incest or child molestation.
 
 
"I have in no way ever taught that homosexuality is the same thing as a forced relationship between an adult and a child, or between siblings," Warren said. "I was trying to point out I'm not opposed to gays having their partnership. I'm opposed to gays using the term marriage for their relationship."
 
 
On Tuesday, the church replaced a brief article on the Bible and homosexuality with an audio message on Saddlebackfamily to better explain the church's view that Scripture prohibits sex outside of marriage between a man and a woman, according to Larry Ross, a Warren spokesman.
 
 
Anyone can attend Saddleback worship services. But the church article had said that gays "unwilling to repent of their homosexual lifestyle would not be accepted" as members.
 
 
Saddleback members must sign a broadly worded covenant in which they agree to follow Bible teachings. While gay relationships aren't mentioned in the pledge, it is meant to cover the spectrum of conservative Christian belief.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 342 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 12/21/2008 9:47:06 PM.
View other articles written by Mogama (32,136)
Mogama


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Matching of Horoscopes For Marriage

10 Ways to Boost Your Psychic Abilities

Origin of 'See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil'

How to survive 2012

The Parable of the Prodigal Son

9 Fruits of the Holy Spirit

Do Justly, Love Mercy, Walk Humbly with Your God

Who were the Nephalim?

Is it Right to Judge Others?

Telepathic Communication Between Two People

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.281.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2010 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company