Writers' Community!
Home
Front Page Page Two Columnists Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Sponsors
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 5,750 Authors
48,488 Quality Articles
& 5,942 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Ira Coffin (483)
Dianne Lehmann (2,782)
David Pekrul (623)
Michelle Mackin (4,264)
Danny Davids (15,947)
Tex Norman (4,196)
David Tanguay (7,675)
Joel Hendon (4,697)
Robert Melaccio, Sr. (6,326)
Avis Ward (10,232)
Tony Price (223)
Mike Fak (4,468)
Terry Mitchell (2,825)
Jeff Brown (7,822)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Clear Skies No Aircraft Contrails in the future?

Using Rocks as CO2 Sponges

Protecting Wires, Cables and Pipes From Animals Without Harming Them

Why Dont They Recycle?

Green Living Tips

Why the Bees are Dying

It Is Not Easy Being Green

Hot Food News-Why are bees disappearing?

5 Renewable Energy Alternatives to Fossil Fuels

Can Golf Carts Help With The Energy Crisis?

Home » Categories » Science & Technology » Environment » Oxygen Controlled Extended Air Wastewater Treatment Plant » Printer Friendly

Oxygen Controlled Extended Air Wastewater Treatment Plant

Rated 3 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Randall Lanier
Submitted Thursday, February 23, 2006
Randall Lanier (75)
Environmental Instruments, LLC
Log in to become a member of Randall Lanier's Fan Club!




THE OXYGEN CONTROLLED PACKAGE PLANT APPROACH



Package treatment systems can present a difficult problem with regard to maintaining good settling activated sludge qualities while at the same time meeting the ever increasing demands from the EPA to lower nutrient levels in the discharge. Sporadic flows, feast or famine conditions can cause considerable problems.

The primary organisms responsible for good settling properties of activated sludge such as rotifers and free and stalked ciliates can become stressed if they are starved of nutrients or oxygen for extended period of time. Nutrient phosphate removal or “luxury" phosphate removal is predicated on the organisms health and stress free condition. If the organisms are not in a well-maintained condition, “luxury" phosphate removal may not be optimal.

Ammonia nitrogen removal is a constant headache if incomplete nitrification/ denitrification happens in the aeration basin. Research on our package plants has shown that optimal removal of nitrogen and ammonia is the key to all other nutrient removal such as carbonaceous BOD and phosphate. For this key to be properly used, oxygen must be controlled in the basin. A somewhat detailed discussion of nitrogen ammonia must be presented in order to fully appreciate the relationship of oxygen to ammonia nitrogen removal.


  1. PACKAGE PLANTS AND NUTRIENT REMOVAL OF NITROGEN

AMMONIA


As the number of wastewater discharges increase in particular receiving water the removal of nutrients such as nitrogen ammonia and phosphorus become more important. If these nutrients are present in large concentrations, oxygen can be stripped from the water and fish and aquatic life can be negatively impacted.


Operators of package type treatment systems need to understand that nitrification and denitrification are both necessary in order to remove ammonia nitrogen from these plants. Most operators, however, do not fully understand that nitrification happens when D.O. ranges between 1.0 – 4.0 PPM while denitrification happens at near 0 PPM D.O.


In the nitrification process “nitrosomonas" bacteria can convert nitrogen ammonia to nitrite (NH+ NO). The nitrite is further converted to nitrate (NH NO) by nitrobacter bacteria. This two step process happens in D.O. typically between 1.0 – 4.0 PPM and is called the nitrification process. The problem the operator now has is that the nitrate (NO) must be removed because the nitrate is still a nutrient. The biological solution is to turn the nitrate (NO) to nitrogen gas or nitrous oxide so it will be expelled into the air. This is also problematic because the bacteria strong enough to achieve this process which is called denitrification, are heterotrophic bacteria. These bacteria live in 0-PPM D. O. conditions. Some operators are convinced they can over aerate and strip the ammonia out. At a pH > 10 this would be true, but the biological health of the basin would be compromised. The effluent could be raised to a pH > 10 and protect the basin but it would require chemicals and hardware to do this and the pH would have to be lowered after stripping and before discharging.


The stage is now set for frustration and anxiety. The operator must keep the treatment facility in aerated conditions in order to remove phosphorus and carbon based nutrient (BOD) but cannot effectively remove the ammonia nitrogen because the bacteria that will do this live at near 0-PPM D.O. These two D.O. conditions are opposite and worse, neither condition can be held for very long if nitrogen ammonia is to be removed. If denitrification happens in the clarifier and not the basin an upset condition could exist. Complete nitrification and denitrification must be accomplished in the aeration basin.


The best solution, which uses the process of nitrification/denitrification for these package plants, is to hold the O concentration between 1.0 – 4.0 PPM and then let it fall to near 0 PPM (.01 -. 1ppm). This can be accomplished by using a D.O. controller that can keep the oxygen cycling between these two conditions. However, only recently has the technology been available to do this, even though D.O. controllers have been around for over 50 years.


The old technology based probes are galvanic or polargraphic in their operation. Oxygen controllers that use the old type technology incorporated into the probes are not acceptable for this purpose. They consume oxygen and have to be constantly serviced and replaced. The consumption of oxygen by this type of probe requires an artificial flow when the air is turned off in order to obtain a reading. Other gases also poison the probes internally due to the fact that they will pass through the controller’s membranes. This type of probe performs very poorly at the low D.O. required for waste treatment encountered in the activated sludge process.


The future of nutrient removal by controlling the oxygen levels to promote nitrification and denitrification will belong to non-consumptive, passive type probes which will not require flow or constant maintenance. Fluorescent probes will meet the criteria for nitrification/ denitrification ammonia removal while also treating BOD nutrients and phosphorus. Time clocks are hit or miss. A good bet would be to take odds that 90% of all package plants which service bedroom communities in the winter time are grossly over aerated at midnight and are starved for oxygen in the morning.



  1. THE RETURN SLUDGE PROBLEM WITH CONTROLLERS


As one would predict, no solution comes without a price or other problems. Controllers using new fluorescent technologies are expensive.


There is also the return sludge problem. Most package plants will return sludge from the clarifier to the basin only when the aeration blower is being used. In the wintertime when the solubility of O is high due to temperature, the aeration basin can be satisfied in its oxygen demand using a controller. However, the return sludge did not return enough solids from the clarifier to effectively mix the solids from the clarifier to the aeration basin. In the summer this is not as much of a problem because the solubility of O is a lot lower and the controller has to work the aeration system a lot longer to get the O satisfied in the basin. This results in more time to return solids to the aeration basin.


One solution for these problems is a smaller dedicated blower to return sludge from the clarifier to the aeration basin independent of the status of aeration in the aeration basin. No package plant should be installed without this. State bureaucracies in the past have allowed this to happen at the expense of the operator and the environment.


Another solution is to use a time clock in parallel with the controller so that either the time clock or the controller can operate the aeration and sludge returns. The time clock can be set to provide a minimum of sludge return time while the controller can provide the control between low oxygen conditions and higher oxygen conditions for nitrification and denitrification for ammonia removal.


  1. CONLUSIONS


In out test facility, which is a permitted facility, our research has shown that phosphorus and ammonia removal, as well as BOD can be accomplished with fluorescent based oxygen controllers while at the same time maintaining populations of good settling species such as rotifers, stalked and free ciliates.


By maintaining an oxygen concentration between low and high concentrations the bacteria responsible for removing ammonia nitrogen are optimized. These low and high conditions also maintain well-adjusted non-stressed populations of bacteria, which will remove carbonaceous BOD and “luxury “ removal of phosphorus. More importantly, the clarifier is not at risk of a denitrification condition. Proper placement of the probe at the front of the plant with independent sludge return control ability is an ideal solution for package plants.


The future of waste treatment lies in Fluorescent oxygen technology, which can be incorporated directly onto a fixed film stationary surface. Specific bacteria will be engineered and adapted for specialized treatment to support specific problem areas in large treatment systems or small ones.

Contact: Enviromental Instruments LLC 828-452-7776 or go to website: www.thefluoroprobe.com






Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Randall Lanier's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Bob Wilson from Mo. (2 years 260 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 4.5 out of 5
It's about time someone approached energy savings and use of existing equipment for BNR. The patented luminescent/optical technology is great!!!
Respond to this comment

» left by awan from ksa (228 days 3 hours ago.)
we are having smell from treated water.can you give the solution.
Respond to this comment

» left by Randy from NC (225 days 3 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
Hello,
It sounds like you are not getting enough oxygen to your aeration basin. Do you have any type of Dissolved oxygen measuring device??
Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

 

This Article has been viewed 1,028 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on Thursday, February 23, 2006
View other articles written by Randall Lanier (75)


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Limestone information and facts

Global Warming- How are Animals Affected by Global Warming

Basic Marble Information and Facts

Marble Information

Polar Bears in Trouble - Endangered?

Christians and Environment – Can Christian Beliefs Inspire a Believer to Help Saving the Planet?

The Definition of Global Warming

Growing Plants with LEDs

Centrifugal Chillers

How To Make Water From Air

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Writers' Contests  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2008 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company