Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 7,775 Authors
70,469 Quality Articles
& 7,557 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Bruce Horst (142)
Joel Hendon (16,285)
Michael Ramzy (633)
E. Raymond Rock (3,068)
Ira Coffin (6,669)
Connor Davidson (5,131)
Ben Morrish (7,936)
Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Sandra E. Graham (7,883)
Fran Larson (2,271)
Shari Vaudo (418)
David Tanguay (9,577)
Missing Link (766)
Gregory Lewis (1,603)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Writers, Why and How to Stop Dread of Marketing

7 Simple Strategies to Stamp Irresistible On Your Book

Searchwarp Awareness Day - Bye Bye Existing Authors & Make Way For New Writers

Saying So Long But Not Goodbye.

Top 5 Reasons Why I Blog

Searchwarp Q&A Bruce Horst Made Kacycarr Throw In The Towel

Sitting in a Wal Mart McDonalds

Why Should A Life Coach Write?

Fanfiction Explained

A Fun Project: Working With Hundreds of Authors At the Same Time.

Home » Categories » Writing » Other Writing » Much Ado About Searchwarp: Fan Clubs, Page Two, Featured Authors, and Article Comments » Printer Friendly

Jeff Brown

Much Ado About Searchwarp: Fan Clubs, Page Two, Featured Authors, and Article Comments

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Jeff Brown
Submitted Friday, March 06, 2009
Jeff Brown (9,928)
Jeff Brown

Inner Projection
Add to your Favorite Articles - Join Jeff Brown's Fan Club


Some of you new to Searchwarp, and maybe some who have been readers / writers for some time, may be puzzled by a few things. Well, I am writing this article to explore a few issues and to get some answers from all who come in contact with the cyber pages here at the Warp.

Fan Clubs

What's the best way to get a lot of fans? Well, that depends on whether or not or how much you massage the competition. But before I get into that, let me digress for a moment, for how one qualifies to become a fan must be understood.

In order to become a fan of someone you have to register. You don't necessarily have to write but you at least have to register. Some who read the articles want to be fans because they've found the article they've just read so moving they must do so. Some do register and never write an article to be fans of writers, but most fans are regular writers at the Warp.

Back to the topic of massaging other writers at the Warp.

Some desire to get lots of fans for whatever reason. One of the reasons is competition. Some may not think of other writers at the Warp as competition or admit to it; however, you'll notice many of the posts in the "writer status" statements at the top of page one or the "Home" page focus on writer popularity which is that superscript number in parenthesis next to the writer's name on any given article. These rankings are based on "search referrals" (people who searched using keywords and clicked on your article)* or "misc referrals" which are, for example,  people  who found your article interesting, forwarded it to a friend and that friend clicked on it.

And if you move up in the rankings you are going to leave people behind or pass them as you do so. Don't tell me that writers enjoy looking up more than they do looking down. Why do so many prefer mountain top views to those at the bottom of the valley? I rest my case.

Now, rankings can be a bit misleading. Just because you get high rankings, doesn't mean you are the best writer technically or inspirationally; this isn't Hemingway's.com. A lot of the best ranked articles are those that people want to read, and what they want to read can be about "hair care," "pets," "ipods and you," or any number of things of less lyrical or inspiring topics.  Some times people just want  cold, hard information. But at the Warp, you can get both: the lyrical and the mere informational.

Now this talk of rankings may seem a bit off base when talking about Fan Clubs, but it's not. For Fan Clubs, to a degree, are an indicator of the writer's popularity. Just as rankings are a loose indicator of ranking or popularity. The ranking of authors at the Warp is not an exact science by any stretch of the imagination, but it works well and does a very good job of letting us know what people are looking for on the Net, and, indirectly, the writer's popularity, of course.

Back to Fan Clubs and the "massage factor," as I mentioned above.

This leads to the problem with "Fan Club" rankings, or the number of fans a writer has. Are writers true fans of these writers they've be-fanned (like befriended) or are they merely reciprocating, meaning, someone becomes your fan so you become theirs or you simply become a fan because you are friends with the writer. An indicator of this reciprocation, or alleged massaging, can be seen in comparing those on the list of "Authors with the Most Fans" with those on the "Authors in the Most Fan Clubs" list.

Want to "see" what I mean? Simply go to the Home page and at the top right click on "Fan Clubs" and begin your comparing.

But just like the ranking of authors the be-fanning of authors is a rough indicator of those who are either good technical / inspirational authors or those with lots of good information. Just how much credence you want to put in the "Fan Club" is a relatively subjective call.

Nevertheless, it certainly is nice to get a slap on the back of the old ego and quite enjoyable any time someone becomes your fan regardless of reason or motivation.

Page Two

I put this in here because I've often looked at page two and wondered why it was there. Not looking at the sub text, I had no clue. But if you're like me, someone who may just miss the obvious, here it is. As it states at the top of the page, these articles are the most popular or "Top Reader's Choice Articles." There's ten of them. 'nough said.

Featured Authors

These are authors who are, as it states, "Featured" or authors who write often and write well, meaning, yes, they do write well but they also, mostly, are popular writers with substantial readership or up and coming writers.

However, there are authors who haven't written in some time with relatively low readership, but most of the featured authors are those who write regularly and are some of Searchwarp's best.

If you cycle through the home page, hitting the refresh button again and again, you'll see at the top pictures of authors. The majority are regulars at Searchwarp and its best writers.

Article Comments

Getting comments for most of the writers at the Warp is the most enjoyable aspect of writing. This is what writers are waiting for; this is why they write. Few if any writers spend hours researching, planning, writing, re-writing, and editing merely for their own enjoyment. Some may say they write for themselves but most write for others to inspire, inform, and educate. For why else do we write than to connect to our fellow humans--writers or not.

However, one of the downfalls of these comments is that too few of Searchwarp's readers drop a line. The majority of comments are left by other writers at Searchwarp and especially by friends of the writer. For some reason, readers are reticent to leave comments. Maybe they don't feel connected or they desire to remain anonymous. Personally, in looking at the great writing that goes on at the Warp, it can't be because what is being read isn't inspiring or causing blood to rush rapidly in reader's veins.

Personally, I extend a hand to all readers who are inspired to drop a comment and let these great writers at the Warp know how you're feeling. It will not only help us to connect to those who are reading, but it will aid us in tailoring our content to what is of greatest concern in your heads and hearts.

I have been writing at the Warp for some time, and with over 50,000 "Page Views" I would love to see more reader comments. The reader to reader comment ratio needs to be much higher, if not to show what you're thinking as a reader, at least do so to give these great writers at the Warp their just rewards.



* You can go to "Control Panel" / "View Your Article Stats" / and under "Other Reports," the far-right header, find "keywords," the "count" and the "keywords" used to find your articles. If you'd really like to bump up your rankings, this is the place to focus. Just find what people are looking for and pop those keywords into your articles, that is if you're merely after a high ranking.


Jeff is CEO of  InnerProjection.com: working with students and parents using the proprietary Success, Design and Preparation system creating a plan to ensure being of the 30% of college grads who don't waste 10 to 15 years or leave 100s of thousands of dollars on the table.

Previous to owning Inner Projection, Jeff worked as a computer programmer and in tech. support, but hated it enough to move from his home in Connecticut to do stand up comedy in Boston where he worked with such comics as Bill Burr, Dan Cook, and Billy Martin and wrote for people like Mz. Michagan who needed material for her ventriloquism act. He then moved to Los Angeles to do more stand up, but found being a college professor more fulfilling. He's married with 3 children.

Looking for a fast paced, fun, inspirational read?: Black Body Radiation and the Ultraviolet Catastrophe (Amazon.com).

 



tweet this!



Reprint Rights

Join Jeff Brown's Fan Club

Comments on this article:


» left by Linda DeWitt (1,909)
Linda DeWitt
(245 days 4 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Lots of great information Jeff. Very helpful to a newbie like me. Thank you, Linda D

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(245 days 2 hours ago.)

Linda,
 
Glad I could help. Thanks for stopping by.

Respond to this comment

» left by Camille Strate (1,404)
Camille Strate
(244 days 13 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Jeff, this is terrific. Not just the content, but more so the 'shout out' for all the writers here. I agree wholeheartedly...about why most of us write. It thrills me to my toes when someone comments that I somehow refreshed or inspired or made them think a little outside their proverbial boxes. And, for what it's worth, I'm a fan of yours because you write well, not because I wanted you to be a fan of mine (not to say I don't, but you get the point...giggle) Your sense of humor tickles me...as do the things you come up with. I think you're pretty TEEEEEEEE-Riffic! Thanks for shining our light!
 
Hugs~
 
Camille

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(244 days 9 hours ago.)

Camille,
 
Yes, getting those "you have a comment" emails are sweet. I don't think there's a writer who doesn't like them, even though I see some writers don't respond to comments. Which to me is strange. It's like writing a book and not collecting your royalties: "No thanks, got enough money. I'm all set."
 
Thanks for stopping by to comment ;=)

Respond to this comment

» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(243 days 23 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Hi Jeff, great article! Nice recap for some oldies and excellent info for new members of our family! Smart write. Blessings! Teresa

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(243 days 22 hours ago.)

Thanks Teresa

Respond to this comment

» left by Leah (12,678)
Leah
(243 days 7 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Hey Jeff :)
 
I read between the lines here ;) hehe
 
There are a lot of good writers on Searchwarp who aren't very well read, and this in no way reflects the quality of their work. It could merely be that from a search engine point of view their content isn't being picked up, perhaps due to an ambiguous title which is a very great shame.

Hence I state time and time again, tell us what the content is in your title. Help readers on the web find your work!

Regrettably sometimes quality can be lost when writing for the web, but we have to adapt to the medium and simple, plain writing with relevant keywords and titles helps Internet users find the content. The best written article in the world may never be found if not for these things.
 
Of course if you're in the top 100 or a columnist of course you are read more by community members and the featured article author nearly always gets readers in the thousands so SEO article writing isn't so necessary.
 
Myself, almost 50% of all my readers are from the search engines and are not registered warpers. I write in plain unadorned language specifically for the web.
 
Re the readers stats, again this appears to be mainly search engine generated so not easily manipulated.

Kacy Carr is the genius when it comes to attracting those search bots!We can all learn lessons from Kacy's writing style.
 
Anyway Jeff, interesting article ......

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(242 days 3 hours ago.)

Leah,
 
Yes, it's interesting that some don't work on SEO, know about it, care about it, etc. and just keep writing along with low or moderate rankings. Then there are others who are more market savey and desire good SEO to promote their products and services. My business / marketing coach has mixed feelings about SEO as far as spending an inordiante time on it when marketing online, for there are other things to work on than merely SEO. Like offline marketing and such.
 
But for those who are worried about their rankings, then they certainly have to know a bit more about keywords and such if that is their weakness.
 
Thanks for stopping by and happy blogging.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (243 days 6 hours ago.)
You write a very well intentioned article. Unfortunately there is something that you are missing. The person who runs this website deletes the responses of people who he disagrees with - whether the disagreeing responder is responding to an article the top guy wrote, or an article someone else wrote. No debate allowed. If he disagrees, the response gets deleted. I know this because I have been deleted many times. The responses I write that get deleted are well thought out, well mannered, use stand accepted english, and ask poignant questions about the thoughts of the author. If the top guy disagrees, the response gets deleted. I wonder if you were aware of that? This website does not welcome all opinions - just the ones the top person agrees with. I have not mentioned his name because I think he uses a sniffer to find certain words that would suggest the responder is in disagreement. Once he is alerted to the response, he deletes it. This community welcomes all - who agree with the top person.

Respond to this comment
» left by Leah (12,678)
Leah
(243 days 6 hours ago.)

Dear anonymous - authors can delete the comments themselves, so please do not presume that the site owner is responsible.

If your comment is deleted (I've had one deleted) then it is likely the author objects.

I suspect your comment here may be deleted, it is after all offensive in that the content is untrue.

Respond to this comment
» left by Sandra E. Graham from Paragould, Ar USA (243 days 2 hours ago.)
I'm not sure about the person who runs SearchWarp, but you are right.  The author has the right and can delete objectional comments.  I have deleted one in all my years at SearchWarp. 
Thanks for putting this comment in, CB.
Sandra

Respond to this comment
» left by Nancy Daniels (242 days 17 hours ago.)
This is directed to Anonymous. 
 
The very first time I commented on an article, I disagreed with the writer who, within just a few minutes, left a picture of a graphic hand with 'the finger.'  It was huge, incidentally.  I was embarrassed and thankfully, within an hour, the writer's comment was gone.  I was pleased that there was an editor keeping up on things. 
 
 

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(242 days 3 hours ago.)

Dear A,
 
Yes, as far as I know, only the author of the article can delete comments on his / her articles. And considering the hundreds of articles written each week, I know the "top guy" is way too busy to be editing comments on all of them. For whatever reason, if you find one of your comments missing, then it is only the author who is deleting. And the author has the right to allow or disallow any comments he / she desires.
 
Hope that clears it up for you. And as you can see from the comments left by my fellow writers that they back up the point made here.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (243 days 5 hours ago.)
No. The real reason is some people do not want to debate. Like I said, I use standard well mannered english. The points I make are intelligent. People who disagree with my political opinion do not want a debate.

Respond to this comment
» left by Leah (12,678)
Leah
(243 days 4 hours ago.)

You Owe an apology to the owner of this site for your incorrect assumptions...that would demonstrate 'well mannered'.

Meanwhile if political debate is what you are after, there are forums. Alternatively why not register and write your own articles and let people respond and have your debate this way?

Also please bear in mind - not all articles are written with debate in mind, in this case you would thus be correct. Not everyone wants a debate and that is their prerogative as are moderating their own articles comments.

Respond to this comment

» left by Avis from SC (243 days 2 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great job, Jeff. I know the newbies appreciate it. Be well!
Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(242 days 3 hours ago.)

Avis,
 
Thanks for stopping by and commenting. Have a great week!

Respond to this comment

» left by Sandra E. Graham from Paragould, AR USA (243 days 2 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great article, Jeff. I have been and probably still am totally confused about everything from ratings to fan clubs at Searchwarp. But, I never really worried too much about any of it. Of course, you are right, it is better looking down than up. I feel guilty now, because I think I have too many fans. I read articles and if I like the article, I join the person's fan club.
 
Great article, Jeff--if I didn't already belong to your fan club, I'd certainly join!
 
Sandra.

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(242 days 2 hours ago.)

Sandra,
 
Yes, I think it's difficult to use all the tools and features at the Warp as they were intended or to optimum effect. However, the Warp is a pretty open community and the people are allowed great leeway in using them--not a lot of "Hey! you can't do that!" coming from the top.
 
And I know being so busy sometimes we don't even note the obvious (like my lack of reading the second line of the header on page two until I wrote this article to find out ;=)
 
Thanks for stopping by and keep up the great writing.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (243 days ago.)
I actually do not owe an apology to the owner of this website, or anyone else. The only thing I am guilty of is disagreeing with some opinions. The polite use of standard english is how I define well mannered. I can be polite as a I disagree with the opinions of some writers. The owner of this website has not given me the same respect. That is a fact. I am writing this in well mannered standard english. This is how I treat everyone I respond to. Here is another fact: The owner of this website was nasty and unpleasant to me as he and I chatted in a thread. I asked him direct, reasonable questions and pointed out facts. He accused me of unpleasant things and deleted the thread of our conversation. The only one who was unpleasant in the thread was him. Disagreement using well mannered standard english is not offensive, therefore does not require an apology to me or from me. As for the issue of debating: Writers offer their opinion on various topics as they write. Posting an article invites the opinions of others. Some will agree. Some of those opinions may differ.The conversation that results between people who disagree is natural, and is what I am calling a debate. The reason I am responding to your article is to make the point that searchwarp provides a very good forum for those who want to participate. It is simply not true, however, that all points of view are welcome. That is a fact. I know because I have experienced that. You may not have experienced that, so you may not have been aware of it. I did, so I am. If your words have been welcome by all at all times, that is a good thing. I hope you continue to enjoy that. You are one of a very few who are willing to openly discuss the topic of their article, regardless of the responder's opinion. I give you credit for that. I have no problem with people who do not like my opinion. Discussing any difference of opinion respectfully is the way to handle it, not being rude and deleting a response. It is my experience that some writers, which in my opinion include the owner, are much more interested in using their article to sell their own opinion, and not interested in considering the opinions of those who disagree. If there was genuine interest in considering my opinion,whether I agree or not, there would be no need to delete my response to anything. Deleting a well mannered response that disagrees with the author shows an activist intention, not one of open discussion. You claim searchwarp is always about open discussion. I am responding to tell you that is not true. Deleting a response is a very effective way to make sure others do not benefit from the information the response provided. I responded to your article because I wanted to tell you searchwarp is not always about open discussion, even though my guess is you believe it is. My guess is your experience with searchwarp shows you it is entirely about open discussion. Mine does not.
 
Once again, I give you credit for participating in this conversation. Best Regards.

Respond to this comment
» left by Leah (12,678)
Leah
(242 days 19 hours ago.)

Just thought you should know, this isn't my article, I am creativeblogger, the author is Jeff Brown.

Meanwhile, you made a false accusation about the owner of this site and so yes an apology is in order regardless of personal feelings.

I myself have deleted entire articles as they caused offence to one person. I took the opinion of this one opinion as reflective of many as I know many people simply do not put their objections in writing. I have also deleted my articles as I later found my sources to conflict with other sources and in the absence of being certain of the truth, I deleted them.

This is the definition of 'well mannered' not mud slinging and false accusations. It is important to act responsibly on the net and truth is imperative as mud sticks.

We shall agree to disagree on the points you make.

Respond to this comment

» left by Bruce Horst (134)
Bruce Horst
(243 days ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great article as usual, Jeff. There is a lot of documenting that I would love to do, but I just haven't had the time. We are fortunate to have writers like you who come along and do the documentation for us!
 
For the record I have never deleted a comment because I disagreed with it. I would guess the writers I've debated on SearchWarp number into the hundreds and no one has ever accused me of such actions before. We (myself and the editors) have occasionally deleted comments which were hateful, argumentative or were irrelevant and detracted from the article on which they were posted, in an effort to keep things cordial and on-topic.
 
One thing that could be added to your article is that SearchWarp is one of the relatively few web sites which still allows comments without requiring the person leaving the comments to be registered and logged in. We do this to try to encourage comments from as many people as possible, but there is a downside as occasionally people will feel more free to post spam or demeaning comments if they are allowed to do so with anonymity. We've debated changing this policy, but so far I think we've been able to manage it pretty well. Usually the worst that happens is one person locks on to one specific writer and won't leave that person alone. When this happens, we can turn off comments on just that one member account, though we have only done this as a last resort in the past.
 
This is one to add to the library.  Keep up the great writing!

Respond to this comment
» left by Nancy Daniels (242 days 17 hours ago.)
Bruce,
 
Interesting.  You can't please all the people all the time.  I've read articles with which I've disagreed; comments with which I've disagreed.   This is the first time I've read a complaint about the 'editing.'  You must be doing something right! 
 
Nancy

Respond to this comment

» left by Nancy Daniels (242 days 16 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Oh Jeff,
 
Good explanations...and I must say the comments on this one are a bit dicey!  I think for all Anonymous has to say, Anonymous should have the nerve to reveal himself/herself.
 
Thank you for sharing this one.   By the way, I never considered my writing for SW as a means of attracting people from the net.   I write lots of articles for my business (and when I first started submitting to SW, they were only business articles)  but I am trying to steer clear of writing that could smack of anything dealing with the voice or public speaking -- although I am considering writing one on the value of breathing and how it can change your life -- but what is fascinating is that  I'm including my bio less frequently on my articles and still getting traffic from the Warp on my website.  It is a little like giving:  the more you give, the more you receive.
 
Again, thanks,
 
Nancy
 

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(242 days 2 hours ago.)

Nancy,
 
"The more you give, the more you receive."
 
That's a great point. Some believe that if they keep taking, they'll get more. Maybe, but the majority of the receivers or those who get the most and the best are the best givers. Case in point, one of our best givers is Teresa, and look how her writing is taking off. Who doesn't love Teresa? Why is she loved? She's a humble, kind, caring . . . giver.
 
Here's to the giver. My we give to inspire not only greater givers but more of them.
 
Peace!

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (242 days 11 hours ago.)
To Jeff - When I read the response to me that said I should apologize to Bruce, I thought I was responding to you, because I just started reading and didn't take the time to notice that Creative Blogger was telling me I should apologize, not you. For that mistake, I apologize to you Jeff. TO BRUCE ONLY: It didn't take long for you to swoop in and relief Jeff of the work of responding to me, did it? The reason I responded to the article you wrote a while ago (and to this one), is I know the tone of all organizations is set by the top person. This website is very helpful and fun for a lot of things. You claim that tone is open discussion for searchwarp. For a lot of topics it is. For the political arena it is not. It is liberal activism, reinforced by the deleted response. I have known this for a while. Bruce, it is your right to set that tone. I recognize that right and respect it. Yes, you read that correctly - I respect it. The reason I chimed in here is to see if you would admit it. You obviously will not. To the person who suggested I have a lot of nerve and should at least reveal myself: I have responded to many articles over time. Many of those responses were supportive and in agreement with the author. I responded to them anonymously as well.
 
Bruce, you provide a very intersting and useful website. Regardless of our differences of opinion, I appreciate the opportunity to post. I wish you success in everything you do. Best Regards+-

Respond to this comment
» left by Leah (12,678)
Leah
(242 days 9 hours ago.)

Mr anon, the only person interested in replying directly to you is me..for now that is. I shan't again as there's nothing much more to be said.

Your use of language in replying to Bruce ie 'swoop in' is not well mannered, neither is your assumption that Bruce was relieving Jeff from a reply. For all you know Jeff has not logged in and read your replies, he has not replied to any made in the last day or so including mine.

You assume too much too often and I suspect this is why many of your comments are deleted as it is tiring making the corrections. Debate is impossible when the item of contention doesn't  exist.

Anyway, good that you know it is 'we' who do the deleting at least. Have a nice day.

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(242 days 2 hours ago.)

Leah,
 
You have done such a great job in my absence that I'd like to know where we can send the check? ;=) (that would be from Bruce and me, of course ;=) Personally, I feel that if people spend too much time justifying themselves and not uplifting others, it certianly says a lot.
 
Here's to you, a beauty inside and out. Thanks for all your comments.

Respond to this comment
» left by Leah (12,678)
Leah
(241 days 20 hours ago.)

Thanks Jeff, meanwhile I think room 101 is the place for anons comments whether he/she likes it or not.
Respond to this comment

» left by Michael Ramzy (641)
Michael Ramzy
(241 days 7 hours ago.)

Jeff, thanks for another informative article. Well done.

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(241 days 6 hours ago.)

Thanks for reading. 
Respond to this comment

» left by Gary W. Halsey Sr. (4,552)
Gary W. Halsey Sr.
(240 days 20 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Lots of great stuff here Jeff, and I truly enjoyed the read. I fell into that ranking and popular gig for awhile, and now I am just happy when ever I get a chance to write!!! I also like to read, and lots of my fans are great writers also, so its not really a "job" to read their work, it becomes a pleasure like the article of yours I just read. Great article, and a good read....Your fan,and friend in pen.......Gary.

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(240 days 10 hours ago.)

Gary,

Thanks so much for stopping by. Hey, don't worry about the rankings. I've seen people low in rankings for months, even a year or more and the woooooosh! Look at Teresa, she was down around 3,000 - 4,000 for a long time and now woooooosh! she's almost four times that. Keep on plugging away. Eventually great stuff gets read. And you've got the right stuff. Thanks for stopping by.
Respond to this comment

» left by Suzy (930)
Suzy
from Midwest USA (221 days 6 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great article, Jeff, and since I am also new at Seachwarp, it means a lot to have the contents explained. In reference to Bruce's comment about outsiders being able to comment and not be logged in is something to which I was not aware. I did get an e-mail today from an outside source asking a question ~ maybe, it's just as well that he didn't leave a comment but it was positive. My biggest wish is to have more people reciprocate with comments and know that isn't always possible but it builds camaraderie. I know it is best to remember, and maybe a lesson being learned, that  self-worth should not validated by reviews and popularity ratings or points.  Write on! Suz

Respond to this comment
» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(221 days 5 hours ago.)

"self-worth should not validated by reviews and popularity ratings or points."
 
How right you are. If that all one is seeking through writing, it's going to be a long, hard, and in most cases, unproductive road. Thanks for stopping by and reading. Have a great week.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 862 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 3/6/2009 1:03:53 PM.
View other articles written by Jeff Brown (9,928)
Jeff Brown


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
How to create a professional Curriculum Vitae (C.V.)

How To Write a Video Game Script

Commonly Misused Words in Writing: They're / Their / There - Accept / Except - Its / It's

How To Leave Constructive Comments

Writing A Simple Book Review

Great Technical Writing: User Document Headings Should Be Guideposts, Not Advertisements

Do You Know What Wa-la Or Wa-lah Means?

Learning American English Can Be Fun And Easy When Approached The Right Way

A little behind John Marsden's Tomorrow series

Computer Journalism a Great Job When You Get Sick.

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.203.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company