Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,196 Authors
71,951 Quality Articles
& 5,406 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Edward Rhymes (8,802)
Julian Price (13,305)
Dianne Lehmann (5,738)
Fran Larson (23,243)
Gregory Lewis (1,502)
Ira Coffin (12,696)
Joel Hendon (18,637)
Sandra E. Graham (10,088)
Shari Vaudo (453)
Steve Kovacs (4,119)
Linda DeWitt (1,955)
Brianna Popsickle (2,452)
Teresa Ortiz (11,094)
Stephany Springer (41,414)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Overcoming Adiction The Imposter Syndrome

Drug Addiction Cause and Cure

How to Overcome Addiction - The Power of Faith!

Why People Smoke - The Peer Pressure Hook

Effects of Smoking 6 Methods to Quit Smoking

Effects of Smoking Did you Know that you CAN go Blind from Smoking?

Effects of Smoking Why is it so Hard to Quit?

Herbs To Help You Stop Smoking

Review: Smoking: 201 Reasons To Quit

Prescription Drug Addiction vs. Drug Ads

Home » Categories » Health » Addictive Behaviors » The Pros and Cons of Decriminalizing the Use of Marijuana » Printer Friendly

Suzy

The Pros and Cons of Decriminalizing the Use of Marijuana

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Suzy
Submitted Monday, May 04, 2009
Suzy (918)
Suzy


Log in to become a member of Suzy's Fan Club!


Most common folks in America, namely myself, are not that knowledgeable when it comes to the subject matter of decriminalizing marijuana but many can see some pros and cons to its legalization and the continuance of its use and possession being a criminal act.

Haven't there always been drug wars in Mexico? Is it possible that the recent publicity of drug wars may be that it has reached international news once again? Could it also be possible that it is unlikely or a little too late to protect our borders much more than it is presently being guarded from this type of smuggling?

I am assuming that the biggest asset of legalizing marijuana would be the billions of dollars its legalization would bring to the United States in tax dollars to an economy that needs fortifying. Plus, regulation of the substance would most likely eliminate a contaminated product being circulated.

The biggest problem that this writer can see with the legalization of marijuana would be the additional number of teens who would attempt to self-medicate when there are presently many using the substance to already self-medicate rather than take, or continue to take, prescription drugs. If a large number of teens are self-medicating, most likely adults are self-medicating on the substance as well. It is possible with legalization that the substance would become less available for this type of crutch or preference for our young people?

Plus, it most certainly could be debatable that smoking marijuana could harm the lungs as much as cigarettes; and there always becomes the risk of exposure to second-hand smoke in any type of smoking? Studies reveal that there are a lot of medical debates being held on this subject matter.

The use and possession of a small amount of marijuana is legal in the following countries: Argentina, certain regions of Australia, Belgium, Colombia and in Nepal it is not legal but highly acceptable in holy men ~ smuggling and growing are punishable in Nepal but use and possession of small amounts are overlooked.

Further, it becomes likely that the use of marijuana could decline if it were not forbidden and would become more challenging to fall into the hands of teens. It is after all, illegal for teens to buy cigarettes and this has reduced the chance of health risks and nicotine addiction. Is marijuana addictive? Or does it become less attractive to legalize because of society abusing it and falling into a profile of being addictive psychologically?

As for marijuana leading to harder drug use, I would think not unless a person is so inclined to becoming addictive or to self-medicate. Would this addictiveness be similar to some users of substances being able to drink one or two drinks and other people continuing to drink excessively?

Those are my thoughts from a view point of playing devil's advocate. I personally believe that it would be morally wrong to legalize marijuana or any controlled substance for that matter. I also find it highly unlikely that President Obama is considering the legalization of marijuana anytime soon if ever. However, the subject is continually being addressed in the news.
 
 

Footnote: While out mowing the yard today, I was thinking back when I knew all my neighbors and before children of the neighbors that I still do know grew to be teenagers or young adults now using and/or selling pot and I ask you this ~ How safe is any neighborhood from drug trafficking? Our children are exposed to drug traffic not only at schools but in the very neighborhoods we live. Dope is just not being sold in the hood but in our neighborhoods.

Scary business but almost more scarier is the fact that pornography is legal and very addictive and tearing away at the very fabric of our society with profound social consequences. How many forms of it is in existence? I say get it off TV, off the Internet and close all adult book stores. I've done enough thinking about these corruptive matters and this is an article about something else ~ it is all very mind boggling! Can we still stop the earth and get off? (added 5/5/08)




Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Suzy's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Steve Kovacs (4,925)
Steve Kovacs
(180 days 10 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Well done article.  What I really like is the style of the article--mentioning some fact, some possibilities and some opinions--at the same time you seem to be open to other facts etc.  The tone of your article, in my opinion is the way discussions about subjects should be held to actually accomplish things.  Nice job.

Respond to this comment
» left by Suzy (914)
Suzy
(179 days 23 hours ago.)

Thanks, Steve, for taking the time to stop by to comment on this article ~ the topic is a tough one.  Suzy

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (180 days 6 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
The "Marihuana Tax Act" of the 1930s created a whole new criminal class. Marijuana was not a new society problem, but the law sure created one! Steeped in the logic of the tax act was a fear and loathing of Afro and Mexican culture infiltrating white suburban neighborhoods, especially in Washington, D.C., where the first "Drug Czar," Harry Anslinger lived.
 
Massachusetts decriminalized at the last election cycle, November of 2008 by citizen's petition. So far, even against the neurotic screams of district attorneys (who are, it must be taken into consideration, people whose job it is to prosecute other citizens) the Commonwealth has no bigger a pot problem than it did before decrim.
 
I do not use pot, nor do I advocate its use. I'm simply one who see that this is a case where the law is the problem, not the subject of the law. Most pot problems are the ones created in the wake of prosecution of anti-drug laws.
 
Think about it: You have a pot smoker--problem, ok. But add to that problem a pot smoker arrested and convicted, now those problems are compounded.
 
One more thing: Most people who decry pot smokers as a scourge that need to be arrested do so believing their own children's lives will not become wrecked in the process of overzealous prosecutors. Their tunes change when it happens within their own family. Just goes to show you that lawmakers tend to make laws that affect the people living on the other side of the track.

Respond to this comment
» left by Suzy (914)
Suzy
(179 days 23 hours ago.)

Thanks for all the facts and details about the subject matter.  I only know that I live a few blocks from a high school and it was discovered by me a few years back from an officer of the law that our neighborhood has or did have, at the time, 2 crack houses ( I am not certain if they are still doing business or not).  I was partially in charge of a neighbor's home while she was recovering from surgery in a nursing home and one of her relatives had apparently left the front door unlocked and ajar, so I called the police to escort me through the house because of not feeling comfortable on whether an intruder had actually entered the house.  As the officer and I left the house, he casually commented that the house down the street and one around the corner on another street were crack houses.  Point being is that I do not live on the other side of the tracks and I am not misunderstanding your comment about laws being constructed for those on the other side of the track, but merely sharing that it is scary business to have drug trafficking going on in a very respectable neighborhood ~ it's possibly more dangerous in some high-class neighborhoods because of Mr. and Mrs. Jones next door or down the street being involved in very serious exchange of drug transactions.  People are getting filthy rich on drug deals with blood on their hands and I am wondering if neighborhoods might be safer if wheeling and dealing with drugs illegally were not possible.  That was what I was rolling around in my head yesterday when I was out mowing and decided to leave the footnote.  Are children safe in any neighborhood these days?
 
Again, I enjoyed your comments and thanks for taking the time to open up another discussion on the matter.
 
 

Respond to this comment
» left by Anonymous (178 days 6 hours ago.)
Crack is the grandchild of the laws against coca. The legal use of coca leaf chewing in South America is not a problem to those people, who use it while not necessarily using crack or cocaine. It is probably too late for coca here, where super strong replacements have already been made. It's like the popularity of coffee in the U.S., where we would rather drink the morning brew than pop a white pill to give us the same effect. If all caffeine and caffeine "containers" (coffee; tea) were outlawed, then we might have a caffeine problem.

Comparing coffee and marijuana is more realistic than comparing marijuana and crack, a profoundly different species of drug. The sentiment to legalize marijuana is just that specific: marijuana, not crack, heroin, meth, etc. And, no, use of marijuana does not lead to use of harder drugs, especially over the long term where pot smokers pretty much contain themselves to pot.

The best deterrent to smoking pot, I think, is peer pressure and peer example. I've known many pot smokers, and it doesn't ruffle my feathers when they do it, but I don't really care to be around them when they do. It is something most people grow out of, but sadly many do not. However, those who continue to imbibe should not be processed through the criminal justice system. I feel there's somehow a weakness, a character flaw in United States culture for this rampant need to outlaw everything that might conflict with the norm.

Respond to this comment
» left by Suzy (914)
Suzy
from Midwest-USA (177 days 13 hours ago.)

Again, I found your comments interesting and do believe that caffeine can be very addictive and dangerous for your health but when used in moderation, it serves as an antioxidant.  I try to limit to 2 cups a day and sometimes don't have an urge for coffee for a few days and on the 2nd day a headache does occur.  It truly does act in a positive way to heighten awareness.  The coca is from the ingredient we use in milk with sugar as a drink?  I have not heard of that and am not that knowledgeable and have not taken the time to do research because of a time crunch.  I look forward to looking into it.
 
I do believe that this subject matter may be making the news more and more as I did hear a couple of blurps on Jay Leno last night that they were beginning to do more research and that the University of California was a college dedicated for such research.  However, you know some of Jay's comments...this may have been a part of a joke as he did further state that he had thought the university had been leading the way in the substance for quite some time.  Again, I have not taken the time to google it.
 
I am finding this to be a most interesting discussion/debate and have learned a lot.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 553 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 5/4/2009 3:27:29 AM.
View other articles written by Suzy (918)
Suzy


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
You've Stopped Drinking Alcohol - What Happens Now?

Alcoholic Like Me - The Personal Story of A Recovering Alcoholic

Is Looking at Pornography the Same as Adultery?

When you Can’t Stop Drinking – The Ten Signs You Have Crossed Over Into Alcoholism

Are You an Alcoholic? 5 Questions to Ask Yourself

Why Stop Smoking Weed? - The Effects of Marijuana on the Mind

Crystal Meth: The ‘Devil’s Candy’

Alcohol - What it Does to Your Looks

Marijuana Withdrawal Syndrome - Symptoms of Weed Withdrawal

What Are You Hungry For? A Psychodynamic Approach to Eating Disorders, Self Injury and Compulsive Shopping

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.031.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company