Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,193 Authors
71,958 Quality Articles
& 5,489 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Julian Price (12,254)
Michael Ramzy (821)
Edward Rhymes (9,204)
Dianne Lehmann (5,838)
Fran Larson (20,012)
Gregory Lewis (1,456)
Ira Coffin (13,580)
Joel Hendon (18,567)
Sandra E. Graham (9,984)
Shari Vaudo (1,123)
Steve Kovacs (4,352)
Linda DeWitt (2,026)
Brianna Popsickle (2,389)
Teresa Ortiz (11,014)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Review of the Book By Jane Hill: the Same and the Different

Particles Fly Again In The Large Hadron Collider

WarpTalk - TECHTALK - Episode 2 - Windows 7 being released this week

WarpTalk - TECHTALK - Episode 1 - Ebooks, Ebook-readers and the future of publishing

Robots Commanded By Man Thought

Temecula Wineries Attack the Desert Heat During Autumn

The Great Debate: God vs. Science

The Ten Most Puzzling Unexplained Phenomema

How To Solve Water Leaking Problem ?

Digital Cameras Must Be Alien Technology

Home » Categories » Science & Technology » Other Science & Technology » How to Make a Scientists Head Explode - 4 Things that Drive Scientists Mad » Reprint Rights » Printer Friendly

Connor Davidson

How to Make a Scientists Head Explode - 4 Things that Drive Scientists Mad

Rated 4 out of 5
Rated an Average of 4.2 by 20 Readers ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Connor Davidson
Submitted Thursday, June 25, 2009
Connor Davidson (5,541)
Connor Davidson

My Books and Articles (under construction)
Log in to become a member of Connor Davidson's Fan Club!


I'm sure that you don't seriously think I would tell you how to destroy all of the science community -do you?

Anyway, what I wanted to explain to you is the four things that everybody seems to get wrong and drive scientists mad in the process. These are:

The Light year is a distance not a time

It makes sense that someone may think that: as it has the word year in it.
 
But, the light year is a measure of the distance light travels in one year. It is not a long period of time as it is often used in colloquial conversation. Understand?

If so; how many years are in a light year? None of course.

The dodgy foot pound

When you think foot pound you are obviously going to be inclined to think that it is a pressure or force. However it is not.

A foot pound is actually a measure of work done (or energy expended) when carrying out a task. This is worked out by multiplying the force applied by the distance moved.

 Vanishing Energy

POWERSTATIONS NEVER MAKE ENERGY AND YOU NEVER USE ENERGY, EVER! If you think I am crazy fine. But let me explain:

There are multiple forms of energy:

  • Light
  • Chemical
  • Sound
  • Heat
  • Kinetic (movement)
  • Strain Potential (i.e. in a spring)
  • Electrical

When for example you are walking all you are doing is converting the chemical energy in food into kinetic energy. Thus you have not used up energy you just have converted energy from one form into another.

Scientists use a rule called the conservation of energy law that states that energy can never be created or destroyed. So when talking about energy keep this in mind.

 

Weight or Mass

As you may know weight and mass are totally different and for very good reasons. Weight and mass are represented by this little formula:

W(weight) = m(mass) X g (gravitational field strength)   

So m(mass) = W(weight)/ g (gravitational field strength)  

This means that mass is a measure of how much matter is in something and is a constant – if you are on earth the ISS (international space station) or the moon it does not automatically change. Whereas weight will change depending on gravity. For example if you had a truck of weight 10000N (weight is measured in Newtons) it would weigh 260000N on Jupiter.

I would advise you to follow these around scientists as most of them have a knowledge sharing "problem" and will have to explain it to you.

Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to apologise to neuroscientists for depriving them of brains to study.

Connor Davidson 06/25/09


Connor Davidson is a published writer and soon to be author:  

He is currently writing a book with fellow SW author Cameron Home    

He has expertise in science, history, politics,maths and English.

He writes articles for many publications by request. To get him to write for your publication email him at connorwjdavidson@gmail.com
 
He writes a weekly column for SearchWarp while also writing for Webgazine, Mind Bust, Icepop, Scientific Blogging and eHow.
 
Don't forget you can vist my site (www.connordavidson.yolasite.com) and I am now on Twitter for you to follow (if you want).
 
 
SearchWarp needs you! Join today: http://SearchWarp.com/Register.asp 
 



tweet this!

The author of this article has chosen to make this article available with free reprint rights.
Click here to copy this article.

Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Connor Davidson's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Lorrie Davids (7,372)
Lorrie Davids
(145 days 15 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Good, Connor. Add to that "where did God come from?" - the question that most people ask at some point in their lives and you have more explosion fodder.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(145 days 3 hours ago.)

It is the creationist vs evoulutuonist.
 
Thanks for the comment.


» left by Mark Ste. Marie (239)
Mark Ste. Marie
(145 days 14 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Connor, a fun read and very enjoyable. Informative too.
 
Thanks,
 
Mark

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(145 days 3 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Ben Jones (7,076)
Ben Jones
(145 days 14 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Hi Connor,
 
Well explained, hope it clears it up for some people.
 
Take Care,
 
Ben.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(145 days 3 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Hannah Quinn (18,320)
Hannah Quinn
(145 days 13 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
And don't even get me started on parsecs! lol
 
Great read. Thanks.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(145 days 3 hours ago.)

OK I won't.
 
Thanks for the comment.


» left by Ronyae (4,469)
Ronyae
(145 days 13 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Connor, such good information, I had to mark it as a favorite. Thanks for sharing this information with us.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(145 days 3 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Nenita Wells from Providence, RI (145 days 11 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Hi Connor.
 
This is such a great read. I truly enjoyed this informative article. Thanks for sharing.
 
Best regards,
 
Nenita

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(145 days 3 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Steve Kovacs (4,156)
Steve Kovacs
(145 days 6 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Connor, you put my brain into overdrive with the mass weight information.  My brain has a hard time figuring out information like that--but thanks for helping it get a little needed exercise! 

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(145 days 3 hours ago.)

But do you understand the difference now?
 
Thanks for the comment.


» left by Laura Trahan (38,332)
Laura Trahan
(144 days 22 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Very interesting article Connor! Very informative!

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(144 days 20 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Rob Trahan (196)
Rob Trahan
(144 days 21 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Connor, great article! The scientific community thanks you. If only you had written it light years ago!

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(144 days 20 hours ago.)

Arrrr... Kaboom!
 
Thanks for the comment.


» left by Dr. Brice E. Vickery (284)
Dr. Brice E. Vickery
(144 days 19 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 3 out of 5
I appreciate the exactness that some of us do not necessarily apply to the explanations.Thanks!

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(144 days 16 hours ago.)

I went through school with people saying at standard grade you were told this whereas when you move to higher it is actually not quite that but this. Then you go to university and find that you learn yet more little lies to keep the course simple. I personally hated this. Thus I like to keep exactness and point out these things so that the explanation is fully correct and picky people are kept quiet.
 
Thanks for the comment.


» left by Teresa Ortiz (10,926)
Teresa Ortiz
(144 days 17 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Connor, if you were my science teacher, I wouldn't have gotten a D.
 
Excellent explanations. Blessings to you! Teresa

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(144 days 16 hours ago.)

Thanks for that!
 
Oh, and thanks for the comment.


» left by David Aiki (414) (143 days 21 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 4.5 out of 5
thanks for the information

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(141 days 3 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Anonymous (143 days 19 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 3 out of 5
Interesting point on the consumption of energy or lack thereof.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(141 days 3 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Ralph P. Brown (233)
Ralph P. Brown
(143 days 17 hours ago.)

This helped makes things clearer for me - please help me understand how I will use it...

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(141 days 3 hours ago.)

I have been into maths and physics for a long time and the question always is when and where will I ever need this?
 
The best answer is not very often - it is not likely anyone will correct you. However, it is one of these things which are worth knowing. If for nothing else it is some great trivia.
 
Thanks for the comment.


» left by Grammy Guru (861) (142 days 13 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Impressive as always, Connor. You make concepts so easy to understand. Isn't that the mark of a true genius?

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(141 days 3 hours ago.)

Wow what a compliment. I find it fun to take complex issues and principals and simplify them. You may have read my Anatomy for Beginners series where I do the same thing.  
 
Anyway thanks for the comment.


» left by Donald Marikovics (6) (140 days 16 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 3 out of 5
Interesting factoids but it would benefit from a a good editing for grammar, punctuation, etc., and more in-depth explanations of these quirky definitions.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(137 days 11 hours ago.)

OK.
 
Thanks for the comment.


» left by Shari Vaudo (415)
Shari Vaudo
(140 days 16 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 3 out of 5
I'm really not into science. Ho Hum.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(137 days 11 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Sophie Castonguay (2) (140 days 10 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Very creative and inspires lots of thinking. It was like an inside look into the mind of a scientist.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(137 days 11 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by jena (429)
jena
(139 days 9 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Very interesting article and quite informative. Thanks for sharing. Have a great day.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(137 days 11 hours ago.)

Thanks for the comment.


» left by Marion Stewart (289)
Marion Stewart
(138 days 20 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 3 out of 5
Found it fun - thought you were a school teacher - only to find an aspiring writer.

» left by Connor Davidson (5,463)
Connor Davidson
(137 days 11 hours ago.)

I am working on a book now- will be out soon.
 
Thanks for the comment.


Please Log In to Leave a Comment.
This Article has been viewed 709 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 6/25/2009 3:51:54 PM.
View other articles written by Connor Davidson (5,541)
Connor Davidson


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Interlace vs Progressive Scan: What's the Difference?

How and Why Atoms Combine - A Look at Ionic, Covalent and Metallic Bonding and their Properties

Robotics, Artificial Intelligence and the Upcoming Human Revolution

Live Space Sex - See the Video?

Is There Scientific Evidence Of A Soul?

Industrial Safety

How to Point a TV Satellite Dish

Types of Digital Printing machines

Fingerprint History

Science and Technology In National Development

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.297.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company