Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 7,756 Authors
70,404 Quality Articles
& 3,410 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Fran Larson (2,271)
Joel Hendon (16,285)
Shari Vaudo (418)
David Tanguay (9,577)
Michael Ramzy (633)
Missing Link (766)
E. Raymond Rock (3,068)
Gregory Lewis (1,603)
Nancy Daniels (1,550)
Mark Parsec (15,056)
Sandra E. Graham (7,883)
David Pekrul (3,696)
Ira Coffin (6,669)
Julian Price (3,951)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
A Look into Our Search for Freedom Thus Far

Dreams, Ideals, Hopes and Reality.

Pirates: Crimes on the High Seas - Do Hollywood Movies Inspire Terrorism?

The White House's Anita Dunn needs to admit she knows nothing about Mao

Oh To Be A Pot Reporter: Would That Be Your Dream Job?

Let's Party Like It's 1929?

GM, California, and Newspapers

Do Cell Phones Create Anger?

The Discovery of the 4.4 Million-Year-Old Lady---How Will it Affect Darwin's Theories?

Burning Books, Bibles, and Music CD's: Amazing Grace or Arrogance?

Home » Categories » Society » Opinions » When Does Life Really Begin? A Perspective on Science, Religion and Abortion » Printer Friendly

Steve Kovacs

This & That With Kovacs

When Does Life Really Begin? A Perspective on Science, Religion and Abortion

Rated 4.5 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Steve Kovacs
Submitted Thursday, June 25, 2009
Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Steve Kovacs

The Kovacs Perspective
Log in to become a member of Steve Kovacs's Fan Club!


Abortion is such a controversial subject that I feel leery writing about it. When I was a police officer, I was all about the facts-I kept my opinions to myself and gathered all the information available, treated everyone equally and made decisions from there. When I teach I make sure to preface my personal opinions as such, opting to state the facts and letting students form their own opinions. Abortion is such a hot subject that many do not want to walk the tight rope of discussing their opinion about it. In addition, there are those who say a man cannot know what a woman goes through regarding whether to abort or not, and thus, some men keep their mouths tightly zipped.

I try to respect everyone and his or her views. Generally, I have an issue with any person who harms anyone or anything for his or her convenience or selfish betterment. Therefore, with abortion, if doctors who perform them are ceasing the existence of, or killing a living being, I am dead against it. How can I not be? However, if the aborted fetus is not alive, just a bunch of cells forming to become a living being at some point down the line, I can see where someone may look at it differently.

Therefore, it seems to me the six million dollar question is whether the fetus before birth is actually a living "being" or not. If it is, I do not believe the majority of women would abort it. I believe most women who choose an abortion do not believe the fetus is yet a living being. I think most feel they are intervening before the fact. Of course, I may be off mark with my hypotheses; however, I believe it to be accurate.

If my hypothesis is correct, we need to look to science for an answer or better put, the truth. Many religious or Godly minded individuals feel life begins at conception. However, many people feel religious views are out of touch regarding this subject matter and consequently disregard the religious viewpoint. So, let us look to science and its fact based, scientific, unbiased opinion.

Maureen L. Condic, PhD, who is a Senior Fellow at the Westchester Institute for Ethics & the Human Person and Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Anatomy at the University of Utah School of Medicine wrote an article entitled, When Does Human Life Begin? A Scientific Perspective.

The article gets quite technical and states an unequivocal scientific answer to my question. After explaining detailed, specific scientific facts, she states her answer, and I quote directly "Resolving the question of when human life begins is critical for advancing a reasoned public policy debate over abortion and human embryo research. This article considers the current scientific evidence in human embryology and addresses two central questions concerning the beginning of life: 1) in the course of sperm-egg interaction, when is a new cell formed that is distinct from either sperm or egg? And 2) is this new cell a new human organism-i.e., a new human being? Based on universally accepted scientific criteria, a new cell, the human zygote, comes into existence at the moment of sperm-egg fusion, an event that occurs in less than a second. Upon formation, the zygote immediately initiates a complex sequence of events that establish the molecular conditions required for continued embryonic development. The behavior of the zygote is radically unlike that of either sperm or egg separately and is characteristic of a human organism. Thus, the scientific evidence supports the conclusion that a zygote is a human organism and that the life of a new human being commences at a scientifically well-defined "moment of conception." This conclusion is objective, consistent with the factual evidence, and independent of any specific ethical, moral, political, or religious view of human life or of human embryos."

The article specifically answers the question of when human life begins with scientific certainty. I have not found any evidence to unsubstantiate the articles facts and its conclusion. I believe that science and Faith rightly understood are in service to the truth and in this case, they agree. For me, scientific fact solidifies when life begins, and for me, on how I feel about abortion.


Steve Kovacs is the author of Protect Yourself: The Simple Keys Women Need to be Safe and Secure. He is the host of the Internet Radio Talk Show, The Kovacs Perspective http://www.thekovacsperspective.com/index.html where he interviews experts in various fields, geared to help and inform. 

Steve's background is in law enforcement, security, investigations and teaching.  Contact Steve any time at:info@thekovacsperspective.com




Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Steve Kovacs's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Suzy (918)
Suzy
(132 days 3 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Hi Steve ~ thanks again for a well-written article but many would say it is very biased. I too feel the way you do ~ life begins at conception. It truly is a most controversial subject matter and one on which I have touched a few times. It appears that this country will always be in a civil war over it, but it is what it is and there will always be differences of opinion. I am just glad I don't have to walk in the shoes of the women who choose to abort and/or the doctors that help make these decisions.
 
Apparently the notorious abortion clinic doing late-term abortions will never again be reopened. I am not sure where this leaves the remaining few doctors that are able to perform them. They are very cause-oriented and have chosen to live in a dangerous and combative situation because of believing women need this help.

The questions become "are miracles possible in those cases where a baby is living inside the womb without a functioning brain, but can't survive after birth, and are all late-term abortions performed because of similar situations?"

Respond to this comment
» left by Anonymous (131 days 7 hours ago.)
Hi Suzy, good to hear from you--Some may call the article biased but it really is not.  I searched for an answer and found it.  Just my opinion—looked at religion, looked at science—found the answer to my question, in my mind.  However, I do not plan on judging anyone, I’m not qualified for that.  You bring up some serious and thought provoking questions about late-term abortion and babies inside the womb.  Sounds like another article for someone!  Thank you for reading and commenting, I appreciate your input.

Respond to this comment
» left by Suzy (918)
Suzy
(131 days ago.)

Yes, the abortion issues were touched upon by someone when Dr. Tiller's life was taken not too long ago and when the president visited Notre Dame.  Have a great weekend, Steve.

Respond to this comment

» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,116)
Teresa Ortiz
(131 days 19 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Steve, bravo. well done. No matter what scientific proof is given, there will be those who will not consider a fetus a living being. Common sense should indicate otherwise. This "tissue", eats from its mother, and has a heartbeat that can be heard at 9 weeks. Women and young girls have abortions because it is easier for them to believe the lie than the truth. But ask any woman who has had an abortion and they will tell you the emotional and physical affects are more than any doctor or nurse could have prepared them for. This is the same for no matter their religious background.
 
Thank you for the sensitivity in which you wrote this, you know, being a man and all :-)
 
Blessings to you! Teresa

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(129 days 9 hours ago.)

Hi Teresa and nice hearing from you again.  I have to agree with you that some believe the lie because it’s easier than the truth in abortion cases.  I also agree with you about the emotional affects involved for most if not all women.  It is a tough subject to talk about and a tough situation to be confronted by for many women.  I guess the best thing someone can do is reasonably state their opinion, knowledge, and experience in trying to make a difference—I hope I did a little of that.  Thanks for writing Teresa.

 


Respond to this comment

» left by sue thom from nj (131 days 18 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
hi steve,
 
you handled this subject extremely well. thank you.
 
26 years ago, i went through a couple of really bad years. i had no idea who i was or what i wanted, but i knew i was afraid and lonely. i made the mistake of thinking the life of a child didn't start for a while, and made a decision to terminate a pregnancy.
 
it was Hellacious then, and it remains so now. i didn't take it lightly, and i have harbored the guilt and shame since.
 
the shadow of that decision lives with me always, especially since i have since had 3 children. i am against abortion, i just am more against the government having one more thing they can control in our society.
 
i believe if one has thought the decision making process out, and they don't feel they can give up their child, and yet, they know they can't afford it, they should be legally allowed to have an abortion-even though i totally believe they are killing their fetus. that is their cross to bear, and i have talked to many women who have had abortions 20-30 years ago, as i did myself, and we ALL still suffer.
 
then, i think of casey anthony. she wanted to have an abortion, her parents wouldn't let her, and her 3 year old was obviously tortured, since it appears she was suffocated, by the age of 3. it confuses me, because i wonder if it would have been better if she had terminated the pregnancy?
 
i guess i just have to know i don't believe in it, i do think it is killing an unborn child, but i still totally believe the government has no right to tell women what they can do and no amount of puishment will ever be as bad as the punishment the woman herself will go through the rest of her life.
 
the government wants to take as many rights away from the people as they can.
i don't think anyone should be involved but the woman who has to wrestle with this decision.
 
thanks for a good article,
my best,
sue

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(131 days 6 hours ago.)

Hi Sue,
 

 I can’t tell you how much I respect people who open up and talk about their past like you did here.  I agree with you that the government cannot regulate certain things and it would be much better if people “regulated” themselves (like drug use etc).  I am not familiar with the Anthony case so I can’t comment on that but it certainly seems that most women (all whom I have talked to) suffer emotionally, or feel terrible even years after an abortion.  Thanks for saying I handled the subject well, I appreciate it--thanks for writing.

 


Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (131 days 14 hours ago.)
Steve:
 
A well written article. Your stance on abortion is clear (as well as mine), however, I cannot disagree with the comments from the woman above.
 
Being in social work a large portion of years, I have seen countless 'children' become pregnant. Many are fortunate enough to have families who will support them (or moreso their child-to-be), but sadly there are so many more who do not, leaving a burden on our system, and even more disheartening, children left neglected (and even more realistically, now a mother who doesn't further educate herself because she has to care for her child). While I personally am against abortion, I do advocate for women to have a choice. She is the one who has to bear the cross, so to speak, of the decision.
 
Let's not even think about delving into the past histories of our bureaucrats, those former leaders who argued for and against Roe v Wade (1973) (or, today's leaders and the personal lives of their families and extended families). A decision was made not on the question of when life begins, but on 'viability' of a fetus. Interestingly enough, there also remained some debate on what the moral and religious role of the political system should be. I don't know, somewhere along my educational career I seem to remember reading about the separation of church and state.
 
I give kudos to you for touching such a deeply passionate and personal topic for all of us, but to me, and while I am not an advocate for abortion, I do not feel it is my position to judge someone on her personal choice because my views are different.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(131 days 6 hours ago.)

Thanks for commenting. You brought up that the debate in Roe v Wade centered on viability, not when life begins, something I did not know, interesting.  I should read more on how that decision was made.  And it’s pretty scary how politicians make decisions for us all the time--and lousy ones most of the time!  Thanks for writing.


Respond to this comment

» left by Lorrie Davids (7,521)
Lorrie Davids
(131 days 10 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Good article, good info, Steve. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(131 days 6 hours ago.)

Hi Lorrie,
Thanks for stopping by and commenting, I appreciate the compliments. 

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (130 days 23 hours ago.)
Hi Steve

Thank you for a very thought provoking article and comments. I have been pro abortion all my life, have not ever been pregnant myself but just feel that a woman has the right to choose what happens to her own body. However, you do bring up some interesting points and I am starting to rethink things or at least be open to why other people would feel so passionately that abortion is wrong. I have two points to consider, however:

1. If a person is going to be brought into the world just to suffer, then is it not better to just leave them as a soul to wait for another life? One of your readers commented about women who have children they either don't want or can't take care of properly and therefore abuse. I can't imagine that these children are living very happy lives. Is it better to live a life of misery than to not be born at all? That's always been the question that has haunted me.

2. Why do people care SO much about these little zygotes (supposedly they have a soul and are a human being already even before they're born) and yet don't seem to care very much about all the people who are killed in war? Already over 4000 Americans and hundreds of thousands, possibly a million, Iraqis have been killed in this senseless war, and yet we're worried about killing zygotes! It doesn't make any sense to me.

That's my two cents. I felt you should hear from a pro choice person to even things up a little.

best wishes

Carmen Lynne C.Ht.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(130 days 18 hours ago.)

Hi Carmen,
 
Thanks for writing for what you did.  It brings a different perspective up and is thought provoking.  Good to hear from you and thanks again.

Respond to this comment

» left by Avis Ward (11,533)
Avis Ward
(130 days 17 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Steve, excellent article and engaging perspective. 
Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(129 days 9 hours ago.)

Hi Avis, thanks for the kind words...
Steve

Respond to this comment

» left by Michael Ramzy (645)
Michael Ramzy
(130 days 13 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
A great article, Steve. I always thought most argued the 'abortion question' as about a woman's right to choose and not when life began in the womb. Perhaps many women would choose life if they knew the truth, yet it seems the argument never gets that far. Instead, it is all about the right of a woman to control her own body.
I can understand that justification since it's easier to put it in those terms than in the 'you're taking a life' term. And yet, it seems kind of hypocritical. We have laws against smoking and other things which harm the body, and yet somehow abortion gets a pass because either (a) men make the laws and they just don't 'get it', or (b) abortion is different because it is a heart-felt decision and not something chosen lightly.
Regardless, all life is sacred, and whatever justification a woman uses to abort a life is hers alone to deal with. But the debate shouldn't be about a woman's right to choose, it should be about the taking of life. Your article points us in the right direction. Great job.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(129 days 9 hours ago.)

Thanks Mike, if I pointed anyone in the right direction that's great-- I appreciate your comments as well as your articles.

Respond to this comment

» left by Wayne Turner from Cape Town : South Africa (130 days 5 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Thank you Steve for a great article void of emotional rhetoric. I am also an ex-police officer and appreciate the angle you have approached this.

Regards
Wayne
Cape Town : South Africa

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(129 days 9 hours ago.)

Hi Wayne,

Good to hear from a fellow ex-policeman from the other side of the world!  I’m glad you noticed my attempt at a lack of emotional rhetoric trying to get to the core.

Thank you for taking the time to comment, I appreciate it.

Regards to you too sir,

Steve

Respond to this comment

» left by Robert Melaccio, Sr. (5,213)
Robert Melaccio, Sr.
(129 days 12 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Steve, a well thought out article and good information. Howerv, that said it really comes down to choice. Now like you I am not going to debate situations or circumstances. What it really all comes down to is do you believe in God and His Word or not. In this age the overwhelming number of people, even while professing, do not believe. It really is a faith issue and many prefer to postpone possibiities. That said, not an easy decision. All life ends and when it does the judgment or oblivian or something else. If the judgment, the answer will be given. Good job.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(129 days 9 hours ago.)

Robert, thanks for taking the time to comment and offering your view.  We are fortunate to have SearchWarp to pass our views back and forth—maybe we’ll all grow a little!

 

Thanks again.


Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (129 days ago.)
Which life is more important, an unborn fetus or a woman?
 
Author Becky Due

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (128 days 21 hours ago.)
The question on which life is more important, an unborn fetus (child) or a woman is absolutely mind boggling. It's like comparing the quality of brief marriages to longer marriages, saying that new traditions are less meaningful than older traditions and an infant's life has less quality than the life of an older person's life - marriages are marriages whether it's fresh and alive or whether communication has shut down, traditions are traditions because they have to have a beginning point, an infant's life is every bit as meaningful as an older and established person's life and most importantly, everyone has a right to life and who has a right to judge if someone is about to enter the world suffering forever and/or live a life of neglect,,,,,,excuses excuses,,,,,,when does ending a life become a personal choice,,,,,,it's all about excuses and since when has it been proven that anyone/a soul has a second chance to be born in another lifetime?

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(127 days 11 hours ago.)

Thank you for reading and sharing your opinions with me and everyone else.

Respond to this comment
» left by Suzy (918)
Suzy
(97 days 1 hour ago.)

That would be me but guess I did not log in ... yes, quite a view from a rant slant.  Suzy

Respond to this comment

» left by Michael S. Garvin from Boca Raton (128 days 12 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
It is ironic that some of the same people who argue that abortion is wrong because it is the taking of a human life are the same people who favor execution of criminals, which by the way is also taking of a human life. In reality,taking of human lives or the lives of other beings are unpleasant (some pleasant) but sometimes necessary functions. Execution of heinous criminals such as Nazis who helped kill six million Jews, killing in self-defense, swatting a pesky mosquito, removing an oxygen mask from a terminally ill patient, and the abortion of an unwanted child who would endlessly suffer if brought into the world are examples of such functions. If abortion was outlawed then the butchers who wielded hangers would again appear. Then the two for one special would also appear: the death of the fetus and the mother.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(127 days 11 hours ago.)

Hi Mike from warm, sunny, and the land of beautiful beaches Florida!  Nice to hear from you again, I appreciate you reading and offering your comments. 


Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (128 days 1 hour ago.)
Great Job Steve! I love the comments from everybody. I know there will never be a win/win on this topic, but talking about it and sharing opinions helps.
 
Author Becky Due

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(127 days 11 hours ago.)

Hi Becky, Great to hear from you and I agree with you 100% that talking about issues—reasonably sharing of thoughts/opinions are the way to go.  I appreciate you reading and offering your comments—Thanks!.


Respond to this comment

» left by Ben Morrish (8,064)
Ben Morrish
(126 days 20 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Interesting stuff.
 
I think it is uncontroversial that after conception, the zygote is something we can technically class as a "human organism" in the sense that it is a living organism with a full human genome.
 
However, that is not the same as saying it is a *human being* in the broader, normal sense of the word meaning "a sentient person", i.e. a being with a high level of self awareness and capacity for pleasure / pain and joy / depair.
 
Any meaningful definition of "human" in the context of the morality of abortion must be more than merely "has a human genome".
 
The moral debate focuses on whether the zygote is a sentient being with capacity for self awareness, joy and despair. The scientific evidence is against this conclusion.
 
Really the species element "human" is not the relevant element in terms of moral decisions - the relevant element is the sentience.
 
And the scientific fact of the matter is that a dog is far more sentient than a human zygote.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(126 days 5 hours ago.)

Hi Ben,


Thanks for bringing up your view and other comments as well.  A controversial subject with many strong views to say the least!  Thanks for reading I appreciate it. 


Respond to this comment

» left by Michelle Mackin (126 days 17 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Excellent article Steve,
 
Very provoking and your stand is great.
 
I am one too who made the mistake and have to deal 20 years and three children later. I know I was driven by fear and what the doctor told me. I believe I made an ugly mistake.
 
Michelle

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(126 days 5 hours ago.)

Thank you for writing with your personal journey and opinion.  Thanks for your other comments as well.  My best to you!

Respond to this comment

» left by David Pekrul (3,704)
David Pekrul
(125 days 10 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
I believe the Koreans consider your first birthday to be on the day you are born. In other words, a person who is one year old, according to us, would actually be two years old, according to the Korean tradition. I think maybe they have it right.

Respond to this comment
» left by Steve Kovacs (5,123)
Steve Kovacs
(121 days 12 hours ago.)

Hi Dave, never knew that fact, very interesting to me--thanks.

Respond to this comment
» left by Anonymous (121 days 12 hours ago.)
I had a good friend in college who was Korean. This is exactly what she told me, too.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 1,395 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 6/25/2009 11:24:20 PM.
View other articles written by Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Steve Kovacs


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
My Personal Review of EdenPURE Infrared Heaters

Providing First Aid To Car Accident Victims

Famous Quotes & Famous Sayings about Cultural Differences, Ethnic Groups, Race, Genocide, Hate

Conflict In the Niger Delta: the Way Forward.

The Impact of Globalization on Cultural Identity

Prostitution - A brief guide

Inappropriate Teacher-Student Relationships Eroding Parent-Teacher Trust

What Does LOL Mean? 19 Different Things and Counting

I Believe We Are Born With Love

Pirates: Crimes on the High Seas - Do Hollywood Movies Inspire Terrorism?

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.172.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company