Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 7,779 Authors
70,487 Quality Articles
& 7,724 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Bruce Horst (142)
Joel Hendon (16,285)
Michael Ramzy (633)
E. Raymond Rock (3,068)
Ira Coffin (6,669)
Connor Davidson (5,131)
Ben Morrish (7,936)
Steve Kovacs (4,545)
Sandra E. Graham (7,883)
Fran Larson (2,271)
Shari Vaudo (418)
David Tanguay (9,577)
Missing Link (766)
Gregory Lewis (1,603)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Overreaction to "Balloon Boy" Hoax

Yellow Journalism Returns

New Reality TV Show In 3D

Profile Pictures - Smoke, Mirrors, Pros and Cons

Separation of Church and Public Broadcasting?

Vets veiw on Michael Jacksons Death

A Star Is Gone

You Too Can Become a Radio TV Right Wing Demagogue

CNN Attack Dog Should Leave Jackson Alone

Stress and the Media: No Country for Old Men

Home » Categories » News » Media » Michael Jackson--Innocent or Guilty... » Printer Friendly

Dorothy M Neddermeyer

Michael Jackson--Innocent or Guilty...

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Dorothy M Neddermeyer
Submitted Friday, February 04, 2005
Dorothy M Neddermeyer (1,570)
Dorothy M Neddermeyer

Genesis Consultants, Inc.

The Michael Jackson case will be hashed and rehashed hundreds of times in private and in the media for the duration of his trial.  What is tragically lacking are the facts regarding pedophiles and sexual abuse of children.  

 

Your station could provide a much needed education about this rampant insidious crime.  Studies reveal 62% of girls and 31% of boys will be sexually abused by age 18 and this statistic is considered to be low.

 

As a specialist in providing sexual abuse prevention and recovery, and author of If I'd Only Known...Sexual Abuse in or out of the Family: A Guide to Prevention, allow me to educate your listeners about sexual child abuse and pedophiles.  The unbelievable reality is that a person who sexually abuses children may seem very average and ordinary to the world. He or she may be a leader in the church, in the community or in business. Pedophiles seldom fit a classic stereotype and they are not necessarily uneducated, unemployed, impoverished or an alcoholic. Pedophilia has no boundaries with regard to education, socioeconomic status, career or cultural background.

 

Furthermore, we find sexual abuse and incest even more difficult to believe or accept when the person we like, admire, love, and/or marry is the perpetrator of the abuse. Therefore, that is precisely why Michael Jackson’s family, fans and the uninformed can unequivocally believe he could not possibly be a sexual abuse perpetrator. 

 

Pedophiles are cunning predators, who have perfected their mode of operation.  First and foremost they are experts at manipulation, thus escaping adult reality. They have a sense of entitlement and justify their behavior as loving not harming the child. They expend great energy maintaining this illusion to themselves as well as others. They create a persona of goodness beyond reproach. They go to great lengths to present themselves as exemplary people, who love children more than most people. Anyone who sees through this façade is met with admonishment and rebuke for being critical, irrational, racist, out to get the person, and/or jealous. The perpetrator is the family emperor with no clothes. "I know my son, and this is ridiculous," Michael Jackson’s mother, Katherine Jackson, said in an interview broadcast on CBS "The Early Show." She said people who believe Michael is guilty "don't know him." Jackson's father, Joe Jackson, said his son was beloved around the world but had trouble in the United States because of racism. He said the accuser's motives were clear: "It's about money."

 

Even more frightening about sexual abuse and incest perpetrators is that within their pathology they do not hold beliefs reflecting society’s moral and ethical values. Therefore, coupled with the child’s innocence and trust of the abuser usually pressure or violence is not required. Thus, the perpetrator can unequivocally state, “I love children. Never-ever. I could never harm a child or anyone. It’s not in my heart. It’s not who I am."

 

Jane F. Giligun and Teresa M. Connor conducted a study of 14 male sexual abuse perpetrators ranging in age from twenty-one to fifty-four. All these men believed that they had deep and loving relationships with their victims. As one man said, “We had a relationship. Right or Wrong, it was a relationship."

 

I am not suggesting that everyone who goes above and beyond the call of duty for children in their care—for example school teachers, coaches, clergy, et al are pedophiles. However, insidiously, perpetrators demonstrate the right, moral and exemplary behavior to develop credibility and establish proof of their love of children. These actions therefore thwart any suspicion of wrongdoing, thus allowing the pedophile access to lure the innocent trusting child and/or parent into letting their guard down and their common sense and suspicions to blur.

 

However, in the Michael Jackson case there is another insidious aspect to his contact with children.  Using the definition of sexual abuse, Michael Jackson’s habit of soliciting young boys for companionship under the guise of helping them with a life threatening illness and/or sleeping with young boys, albeit according to him, he slept on the floor and the child slept in his bed, that in and of itself is sexual abuse.  Having said the aforementioned, the definition of sexual abuse is necessary.  

 

Traditionally, incest was defined as "sexual intercourse between two persons too closely related to marry legally--sex between siblings, first cousins, the seduction by fathers of their daughters." This dysfunctional blood relationship, however, does not completely describe what children are experiencing. To fully understand all sexual abuse, we need to look beyond the blood bond and include the emotional bond between the victim and his or her perpetrator. Thus, a new definition has emerged. The new definition now relies less on the blood bond between the victim and the perpetrator and more on the experience of the child.

 

"Incest is both sexual abuse and an abuse of power. It is violence that does not require force. Another is using the victim, treating them in a way that they do not want or in a way that is not appropriate by a person with whom a different relationship is required. It is abuse because it does not take into consideration the needs or wishes of the child rather, it meets the needs of the other person at the child's expense. If the experience has sexual meaning for another person, in lieu of a nurturing purpose for the benefit of the child, it is abuse. If it is unwanted or inappropriate for her age or the relationship, it is abuse. Incest [sexual abuse] can occur through words, sounds, or even exposure of the child to sights or acts that are sexual but do not involve her. If she is forced to see what she does not want to see, for instance, by an exhibitionist, it is abuse. If a child is forced into an experience that is sexual in content or overtone that is abuse. As long as the child is induced into sexual activity with someone who is in a position of greater power, whether that power is derived through the perpetrator’s age, size, status, or relationship, the act is abusive. A child who cannot refuse, or who believes she or he cannot refuse, is a child who has been violated." (E. Sue Blume, Secret Survivors).

 

I am available for an interview at your convenience.

 

Dorothy M. Neddermeyer, PhD

Specialist in Sexual Abuse Prevention and Recovery

480-704-0603  www.gen-assist.com

dorothyneddermeyer@gen-assist.com 






Reprint Rights

Comments on this article:


» left by Dorothy M. Neddermeyer (1 year 249 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
You just lost a million dollars. If I were on that jury or if I had been a consultant/witness for the prosecution MJ would have been convicted. One woman on the jury was interviwed a few weeks after the trial. She stated she knew he was guilty, but didn't want to see MJ in jail. How sad is that? She didn't want to see MJ in jail, because she had memories of him as a little boy follicking on the stage singing. Has MJ sexually abused anyone since? I would bet my million dollars on that. After the trial he went to Sri Lanka where there are hundreds of child sex rings pimping children. Yes, our laws state that a person is innocent until proven guilty, but that doesn't mean the person is innocent. While a realize some people are wrongly convicted, some people also get away with their crime. MJ has gotten away twice. I know other sex offenders who have gotten away too, but they are not famous or wealthy. They simply constructed an iron clad ruse to deflect any way reports of his perpetration. I rest my case. MJ is guilty as charged.
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Adnach1 from Jaffna (1 year 249 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
i must apologise for my previous post that i did exceptionally quickly....i read it over and it was very incoherent!
But i'm sure you can understand most of it...hopefully
Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Adnach1 from Jaffna (1 year 249 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
ummm.....excuse me?!
Are you making these things up now??
i would like to see a reference where the juror said that....i know your lying with that
and also mj has actually never been to sri lanka before???!!
Its a small wartorn country...it wud have actually made massive news here
I can see that you are a bit up yourself to think that you were the key thing missing for the prosecution team!
Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Adnach1 from Jaffna (1 year 249 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
So the taped recording means nothing..
Aphrodite Jones' book means nothing..
The family's history of trying to get money (JC Penney etc) means nothing..
The family's history with other celebs mean nothing..
The juror's comments on the family: 'inconsistent, rehearsed, suspicious, ridiculous, unsubstantial...means nothing
The fact that you have contradicted yourself by saying that pedos (inc mj) appear normal in everyday life means nothing...
The fact that MJ has never hidden his connection and love for children means nothing...
The fact that the allegations came about after world-wide rumors were sparked..means nothing
Past cases of accusers proven lying...just for money...means nothing

Its SOOO obvious that MJ was behind this all! How could i have thought otherwise????

the fact that the family accepted money in 1993, and you claim was due to emotional hardships of the lengthy trial...money makes everyone feel emotionally better doesn't it?? If i was raped, i would rather the money than to fight for my rights...SURE??!!...what kind of BULL is that????



Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Dorothy M. Neddermeyer (1 year 249 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
You willingness to continue to discuss this case is evidence that the more you attempt to make MJ innocent, the more information there is to bring to bear that he is guilty. The key missing prosecution witness was indeed someone who is an expert in sex offender MO. I wasn't saying it could only be me. Your bet that if I was on the jury I would have voted to aquit, is simply and utterly wrong. You can't speak for me, and therefore, I spoke for myself. I erred in stating MJ moved to Sri Lanka. He moved to Bahrain, June 29, 2005.

You ask if my book was prejudicial? Of course the answer is NO or I would not have written it. It did, however, tell the unabridged truth about the most frequent perpetrators, who are 80% family members, and 19% are sex offenders outside the family known to the child, their multi-leveled ruses and MO, including interviews with convicted sex offenders regarding their ruses and MO. It is the lack of education and common myths about sex offenders, which allows perpetrators to continue to abuse children. The majority of sex offenders abuse 100 or more children before they either die or are convicted and serve jail time. Unfortunately, without any rehabilitation, 80% of sex offenders reoffend after incarceration. This is tragic, because the majority of sex offenders can be rehabilitated. My success rate with sex offenders is 100%. The process, I use is the same as I use for sexual abuse and physical abuse survivors, because all sex offenders are either sexual or physical abuse survivors or both. A sex offender is acting out their own childhood abuse trauma. It is like a moth to the flame. MJ is probably one of the few sex offenders who could not be rehabilitated. The reasons why are too complicated to explain here.
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.
» left by nefertari from US (123 days 19 hours ago.)
You are the only person in the world to have a 100% success rate with *any* type of therapeutic treatment, let alone one so difficult to treat as pedophilia.

Anyone who claims to have a 100% success rate, is one I stay away from.  It is simply not possible. 

Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.
» left by Dorothy M Neddermeyer (1,552)
Dorothy M Neddermeyer
(123 days 19 hours ago.)

You are entitled to your opinion, which has no bearing on my reputation and achievements in healing people's lives, especially sexual abuse survivors.
 
 

Since you are the author of this article, you may Remove this comment.

» left by Dorothy M. Neddermeyer from Arizona (1 year 244 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
MayC: Making accusations when you have only one fact is interesting. I have a long list of facts to back my statements regarding MJ, not to mention 33 years of working with sex offenders in the healing process, which has given me well balanced knowledge of their MO and what prompts a sex offender to abuse children. I did not delete any posts and furthermore, didn't know they could be deleted. Is it possible the owner of this website deleted it? Your apology is not necessary, although it is warrented. I am not here to discredit anyone's beliefs, I am here to educate. As an educator I am ethically and morally bound to use accurate and well-founded information.
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Ardnahc from Jaffna (1 year 220 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
Your "well founded information" in my opinion does not account to MJ's life and situation.
Every jury member found the child to be "rehearsed"
The family were sued for welfare fraud immediately after the trial.
The mother and son have lied under oath.
They have been involved with other celebrities, who thought they were sus.
Aphrodite Jones had first hand view of the evidence held at the trial...before writing her book on the mj conspiracy, (like that boy's interview with the police).
Why are the family's dodgy background simply ignored?
You may be an expert on sex offenders...but thats only half the story of the MJ trial. The other half that you have chosen to not account for, is MJ's side.
Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Dorothy M. Neddermeyer from Phoenix (1 year 220 days ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Yes, I have taken the family's dodgy background into account. In fact, the family background is one of the reasons MJ targeted this child, because, their background is murky and icky, therefore this is a perfect, 'reasonable doubt,' scenario for MJ if he were to be accused of sexual child abuse. It worked well didn't it? Every sex offender is cunning in their choice of victims in many ways. MJ has a well honed 'reasonable doubt' strategy in place before he targets a child. If your child was sexually abused by MJ, I know you would be singing a different tune. I wish you well in your beliefs may they serve you in the best way possible.
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by ABC123 from London (297 days 21 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
""In fact, the family background is one of the reasons MJ targeted this child, because, their background is murky and icky""D.M
 
Chris tucker (celeb comedian) was the one who introduced Gavin to MJ. It was Gavin's DYING (with cancer) WISH to meet Michael Jackson. MJ did not sought for that child.
 
""How many 40+ men do you know who befriend children as their companions, friends and playmates."" D.M
 
How many musical geniuses do you know? How many musical artists do you know that has been successful since the age of 11? How many artists do u know that has sold over 750 milion cds?
 
Janet his sister says in an interview that MJ used to scare her coz he used to speak to mannequins as a child... (thts how desperate he was to have friends, and someone to talk to as a child)
 
Do you not believe that having a lost childhood is the reason to havn children around him constantly? He is oblivious of the fact that it is wrong to have children around him all the time because rumors tht can arise. If he WAS in fact molesting children, he wudnt be soo open to admit to sleepn in the same room as them. If he knew what pple thought of it, he wudnt say it, because he wud then kno tht it will hav a damaging affect on his career n all. But he is socially inept (because of the deprived childhood)
 
"".. therefore this is a perfect, 'reasonable doubt,' scenario for MJ if he were to be accused of sexual child abuse. ""
 
So are u saying MJ only chooses his victims, by gaining knowledge about their past? What about the 1993 case? Why did MJ choose him in tht situation?
 
the biggest question is WHY WOULD MJ MOLEST A CHILD 5 TIMES, AT A TIME WHERE THERE IS GREAT SUSPICION OF HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH CHILDREN AROUND THE WORLD ??

Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Dorothy M Neddermeyer (1,552)
Dorothy M Neddermeyer
(297 days 6 hours ago.)

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify my stand on the issue of Michael Jackson's sexual abuse case. You ask a profound question--one that I have asked every sex offender each and every time I have worked with them in the recovery process.
 
The reason a sex offender reoffends is because they can not stop themselves. Their behavior is driven by a compulsion they are unable to control. In the face of possible detection and jail, they can not control their compulsion. A compulsion is beyond the normal boundary setting behavior that a person who does not have a compulsion emgage within. It is the same as a moth to the flame. Moths do not learn from one another that if they fly too close to a light, they will be burned to death. Other more intelligent animals learn from their own or other animals experiences. Case in point, pigs, horses, sheep and cattle learn that they do not like an electric shock.  Many farmers use electrified fences to keep animals away from certain areas. The electric fense is powered with a battery. The battery is equipped with a clicking sound, when it is on. After a few instances of being shocked by the electrified fense, the animal learns that the clicking sound and being shocked are connected. They learn to stay away from the fense when the clicking sound is apparent and when it is not apparent they know they can go to the area that was previously off limits. NOT so for creatures with lower intelligence, thus, the moth to the flame is a sure bet and thus, the heat  lamps work to get rid of bugs.
 
A compulsion blocks out the intelligence of the person. How does one acquire compulsive behavior?  It is a coping mechanism as a result of early childhood emotional, physical or sexual trauma. All sex offenders have a history of emotional, physical or sexual trauma.  This is NOT to say that all people who have been emotionally, physically or sexually traumatized are sex offenders. Every person has a plethora of choices in how to cope with trauma--some are compelled to act out rage in domestic violence, crimes, road rage, etc. Furthermore, this explanation is simply an explanation and does not condone the behavior.  
 
The key to preventing sexual abuse is to teach children how to protect themselves and to heal the offenders. Surveys reveal that sex offenders abuse as many as 100 children in their lifetime. 85+% of  Sex offenders who were incarcerated reoffend. This is because incarceration does not heal the core wound that caused the compulsive behavior. 
 
Nor does registering sex offenders prevent sexual abuse. The most important defense against sexual child abuse is awareness. Society needs to step out of the deep denial. Case in point, the Michael Jackson case. Because MJ is a celebrity and because he does good work for children, he is considered exempt from  the MO for sex offenders.  And sex offenders rely on society's deep denial to continue their crimes. Case in point Michael Jackson. 
 
 
the biggest question is WHY WOULD MJ MOLEST A CHILD 5 TIMES, AT A TIME WHERE THERE IS GREAT SUSPICION OF HIS INVOLVEMENT WITH CHILDREN AROUND THE WORLD ??

Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Anonymous (119 days 8 hours ago.)
As a victim of incest, and by someone that EVERYONE adored and respected, I can say that NO ONE really knows Michael Jackson or ANYONE for that matter. People are not always what they seem. Nor does a heinous act define someone completely. Things are more complex than that.

Having said that, extortion can be a serious issue for the rich and famous. Just recently a couple of people tried to extort money from John Travolta right after his son died! So, I wouldn't put it past someone to accuse MJ of molestation, if it meant getting lots of money. And, lets face it, MJ was an easy target.

What is my point? No one except the people involved know what happened! What I find so disturbing about these MJ accusations, is HOW SURE EVERYONE IS that he's guilty. There was no evidence. People are basing his guilt on the settlement and that he admitted to sharing his bed with kids. These are indeed bad choices on his part, (because of the suspicions they create,) but ARE NOT evidence that he is guilty of child molestation. I followed the trial and there was lots of room for doubt. The jury got it right. I know first hand the trauma done by child molestation, and wouldn't want any child to go through what I went through. But, that doesn't mean convicting someone who could be innocent! The media ran with this story, and the masses responded in kind. So everyone needs to stop acting like they witnessed his guilt first hand. Outrageous really.

Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.
» left by Anonymous (118 days 17 hours ago.)
Your beliefs stated in the last paragraph is precisely why sex offenders like MJ develop plausible ruse to confuse the majority of people.  MJ had a well honed ruse, that worked for at least 30 years, if not longer. It is a sad commentary on the American legal system and society.  
 
Ask yourself this question. If you were a parent would you allow your child to sleep in a 30 - 45+ man's bed, play games and watch TV unsupervised? How many 30 - 45+ year old men do you know who behave in such a manner and NOT have legal repercussions, if it is reported?
 
MJ was NOT found guilty because the jury could not think of convicting 'little cute,' Michael Jackson, albeit he was an adult, who committed sexual abuse.

Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Dorothy M Neddermeyer (1,552)
Dorothy M Neddermeyer
(117 days ago.)

True to pedophile behavior MJ telegraphs that he is guilty of sexually molesting children and got away with it in his dance skit, 'Smooth Criminal.' Notice when he is dancing in shadow his left hand, which resembles an erect penis, comes up for a second. This wasn't a fluke--MJ meticulously choreographs his every move. Of course, he pays the price in the end.

Since you are the author of this article, you may Remove this comment.

» left by Anonymous (81 days 3 hours ago.)
MJ was innocent. End of story, there is so much evidence that he didn't do anything wrong. People trying to bring him down really makes me doubt humanity.

Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by informed from canada (75 days 10 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 0.5 out of 5
With all due respect, you are a few clowns short of a circus. The reason the courts and the public find MJ not guilty is because there was no evidence of his guilt- none in the raids, none in the testimonies, none anywhere. I firmly believe that anyone can be guilty of such a crime- hence my attention is not on an eccentric philanthropist but on my Sunday School teachers, neighbours, and husbands.
 
If sharing a room or bed with children is in and of itself sexual abuse, then poor people, grandparents, babysitters, chaperones are all guilty- and various family arrangements worldwide are all child molesters.
 
How Victorian. Stop your scaremongering.
 
I go out on a limb to say that even IF Jackson were guilty, which after CAREFUL research of court transcripts, books, psychology, and tapes of witnesses, the kind of humiliation circus he went through was inhumane. What are you doing about the missing girls in your neighbourhood? Why have serial killers, proven ones, received more dignity during trial? Why do you still listen to Elvis who liked teenage girls? What about the Talmud with special rules for infant sex, Hindu infant marriages, Mohamed's six year old wife, and 12 year of virgin Mary and her baby?
 
Knowing that the first family sued MJ for 20 million, then when he failed to give it to him said they would ruin his life forever, then came up with the story that could ruin his life, doesn't that give you a warning that this was extortion? MJ countersued for extortion. His insurance advised him to pay out. He WANTED to go to court. It couldn't go to court because the child would not testify against MJ. Later, as an adult, Jordie would not testify as a witness to the second round. The new family has a known history of charging people with sex abuse and fraud!
 
You are the one with a sick mind.

Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.

» left by Anonymous (14 days 11 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 1 out of 5
True to pedophile behavior MJ telegraphs that he is guilty of sexually molesting children and got away with it in his dance skit, 'Smooth Criminal.' Notice when he is dancing in shadow his left hand, which resembles an erect penis, comes up for a second. This wasn't a fluke--MJ meticulously choreographs his every move. Of course, he pays the price in the end.
 
This would have to be the biggest pile of tripe I have ever had the misfortune to read. Michael Jackson was innocent...End of story.

Respond to this comment
Since you are the author of this article, you may Mark this comment as not needing a response, Remove this comment.
» left by Anonymous (13 days 15 hours ago.)
You are entitled to your opinion, although it is naive.

Since you are the author of this article, you may Remove this comment.

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 2,381 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 2/4/2005 10:40:09 AM.
View other articles written by Dorothy M Neddermeyer (1,570)
Dorothy M Neddermeyer


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Overreaction to "Balloon Boy" Hoax

What Not To Wear When Doing A TV Interview

Michael Jackson--Innocent or Guilty...

All Sides of Abortion. Should The Father Have A Say?

Media Training 101: the Top Ten Tips For TV Interviews

World's Oldest Fire Department Begins Accepting Volunteers

Easy ISO 9001 2008 Release V4

Mafia connected to Brett Kebble's murder?

The Fight Against Globalization

Yellow Journalism Returns

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.039.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company