Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,197 Authors
71,953 Quality Articles
& 4,999 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Edward Rhymes (8,802)
Julian Price (13,305)
Dianne Lehmann (5,738)
Fran Larson (23,243)
Gregory Lewis (1,502)
Ira Coffin (12,696)
Joel Hendon (18,637)
Sandra E. Graham (10,088)
Shari Vaudo (453)
Steve Kovacs (4,119)
Linda DeWitt (1,955)
Brianna Popsickle (2,452)
Teresa Ortiz (11,094)
Stephany Springer (41,414)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
The Biblical Reasons For Working and Earning Money

Biblical Steps You Can Take To Get Out Of Debt Part 2

Biblical Steps You Can Take To Get Out Of Debt

More About What The Bible Says About Debt

What The Bible Says About Debt

Thou Fool of Matthew 5:22

How is Materialism Destroying Society?

Thoughts on Works and Production Oriented Society and Christianity

Christ's Atonement

The Greater Reality

Home » Categories » Bible Study » General Bible Study » Did God Purposely Tempt Adam and Eve - Answers to Biblical Questions Part 2 » Printer Friendly

Teresa Ortiz

Laugh a Little, Think a Little, Learn a Little

Did God Purposely Tempt Adam and Eve - Answers to Biblical Questions Part 2

Rated 4.5 out of 5
Rated an Average of 4.6 by 5 Readers ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Teresa Ortiz
Submitted Monday, July 27, 2009
Teresa Ortiz (11,014)
Teresa Ortiz

Freelance writer/Speaker
Log in to become a member of Teresa Ortiz's Fan Club!


In part two of this topic, I will address four of the many questions asked by Philip, as they relate to one another. These have to do with the tree of knowledge, why God would tempt his children and why the punishment for disobedience was passed on to Adam and Eve's children. Discussing these issues will lead us to the forth issue, which is the idea of all people being God's children.

I will go back to the bible to let it answer these biblical questions for us. I fully acknowledge there are those who do not believe the bible to be the inerrant word of God to man. My point is not to convince otherwise, only to offer answers as to why many Christians believe the way they do. I also acknowledge there are varying degrees of understanding and interpretation within the body of Christ. This makes perfect sense as we all come from different backgrounds and traditions. Nevertheless, there are many constants within the differing denominations of Christianity and three of them are the origin of man, the concept of original sin, and the need for forgiveness and restoration to a Holy God. It is with this in mind that I humbly and prayerfully offer the following explanations.

On the tree of knowledge –

"Then God said, ‘Let us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth"…Then the LORD God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to tend and keep it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, ‘Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die." Genesis 1:26,15-17.

In this passage of Scripture we see several things; that man was created in the image of God and in His likeness – what is God like? He is a spiritual being that has no end, and is pure in thought and action, and is a loving creator who will teach and discipline when necessary.

We see that Adam and Eve and all of mankind were never intended to die as is evident from the statement "in that day you eat, you shall surely die. Next, we see that freedom of choice was instituted by God when he laid out the commandment not to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The question is raised, why would God tempt them on purpose? God did not tempt them, but gave them free will. He created mankind for fellowship in a loving relationship with Him. In order for love to be genuine, it cannot be forced – would it really be love if there were no choice? In God's love and foreknowledge, he knew they would stray, so he warned them what would happen if they did, and he already had a plan in place to restore them to fellowship when they did.

"Let no one say when he is tempted ‘I am tempted by God', for God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does He Himself tempt anyone. But each one is tempted when he is drawn away with his own desires and enticed. Then when desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, brings forth death." James 1:13 – 15

Eve was tempted by Satan, he planted thoughts in her head and told half-truths about God's intent in keeping them from eating the fruit, she fed on those initial thoughts, and it gave birth to sin.

"So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate." Genesis 3:6

It was the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life that caused her to sin.  (1 John 2:15-17) In effect, she allowed the twisted lies of Satan to lead her thoughts to a place where she convinced herself that God must be keeping something good away from them. God gave them everything – any tree for food, dominion over the land and freedom to fellowship with Him at any time, and it wasn't good enough.

The result was banishment from the Garden. Why – because in this same garden was the tree of life. And since they were now in a fallen and sinful state, God did not want them to eat of this tree. If they had, they would remain in their sinful state for all eternity. (This is explained in detail in another article found here.)

One might suggest the bible's inconsistency in that Adam and Eve did not die that day, so therefore there is no reason to go on with this story. However, closer examination shows us they did die. They died spiritually (separated from fellowship with God) and they died physically as well – that "day" just as it says.

"And they heard the sound of the LORD God walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the LORD God among the trees in the garden. Then the LORD God called to Adam and said to him, "Where are you?' So he said, ‘I heard Your voice in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; and I hid myself." Genesis 3:8-10

"Behold, the LORD's hand is not shortened, that it cannot save; Nor His ear heavy, that it cannot hear. But your iniquities have separated you from your God; and your sins have hidden His face from you, So that He will not hear." Isaiah 59:1-2

"But beloved, do not forget this one thing, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." 2 Peter 3:8

We see that Adam and Eve ran away and hid from God, they didn't want Him to see them or hear them – and we learn that Adam lived to be 930 years old. (Gen 5:5)

The beauty is that we read that God reached out to restore fellowship. In his Justice he could have left them spiritually dead, but in His mercy he called out to them, giving them an opportunity to repent and acknowledge their sin. In God's Holiness, he had to keep his word in that sin brings death – and in this, he sacrificed an animal and made tunics to "cover" their sin – this was a picture of the ultimate sacrifice Jesus would make. God gave life for life.

The next question raised, is why were their children punished as well. The answer is as simple as looking at life today – if a woman were to drink alcohol and use drugs while pregnant, the child will suffer the consequences. They are not punished, but rather the unfortunate recipient of sinful behavior. Naturally speaking, they will have to do what they can to repair the damage caused by their mother.

And so it goes spiritually, which leads us to the final question/comment for this article.

On all people being a child of God –

As Genesis tells us, man was created in the image of God. But through disobedience, we lost the spiritual ability to display His attributes. We instead carry the image of the first man Adam, who birthed sin into the line of man and caused everyone to be born spiritually dead – hence the need to be born again by the Spirit of God, thus becoming his child, so that we may once again be transformed into the image of God through Christ.

The bible clearly teaches that God is the Father; however, not everyone is his child, only his creation. It teaches that we are adopted as children through faith in Christ.  Before Jesus was born, people became a child of God through faith in God and his coming Messiah.

"Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all have sinned…For if by the one man's offense death reigned through one, much more those who receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ" Romans 5:12, 17

"He [Jesus] came to His own, but His own did not receive him. But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name; who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. John 1:11-12

"For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus." Galatians 3:26

"But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption as sons." Galatians 4:4

The choice is ours. God the Father is loving, but He is also just and His very character calls Him to be true to His word – He lays life and death before us as His creation, we decide our fate: Respond to His call and restore our fellowship with Him, or remain in our separated state for all eternity.

God is not the tempter; He is the giver of life.

Thank you again for staying with me, it was impossible to keep this short and still there is much more to say regarding these issues. I welcome continued discussion in the comments section, and as always, invite other believers to add insight to the topic.

I pray this will at least give cause to search the Scriptures with a heart that calls on God and His Holy Spirit to give spiritual eyes and minds to better understand the things of God.

"The Lord is not slack concerning His promise as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance." 2 Peter 3:9

This brings us to the perfect will of God, the permissive will of God, and God's "chosen" people coming soon in part three.
 
 

© Teresa Ortiz



tweet this!



Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Teresa Ortiz's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Avis Ward (11,504)
Avis Ward
(101 days 10 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Sistah T,

I'm thankful you are sharing this with others. We do not want anyone to be in darkness yet know many are and will remain. As for me and my house . . . Reading this reiterates why I serve, trust, love and do my best to obey Him. What a loving God we serve and you've done a remarkable job with the Holy Scriptures portraying Him as such, even in our disobedience. Great job! Many blessings and much love.

Sistah A

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(100 days 15 hours ago.)

Hi Avis, thanks for the encouraging words! You never know what kind of responses you are going to get from a piece like this. With the exception of the occasional blast, I love that it turns into a healthy and respectful conversation even in disagreement.
 
All Christians need to excercise their gift - when we do this, we come together and compliment one another's offering. We cannot wait until we are perfect or know it all, otherwise we would never do a thing. The key is remaining humble recognizing our limitations and imperfections, but at the same time, not using them as an excuse to remain silent.
 
You my dear are a fine example of grace - keep serving Sistah!

Respond to this comment

» left by Jeff Brown (10,228)
Jeff Brown
(101 days 10 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 3.5 out of 5
Teresa,
 
Few questions / comments for thought.

If God is merely a spiritual being, how will we as humans, of human form, be able to relate to Him. But for us simple humans to relate, shouldn't he be like us? It would be like our parents being gaseous blobs telling us what to do. Difficult to relate to. For it does state Then God said, "Let us make man (human, flesh and bone) in our image, in our likeness (human, flesh and bone?), and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. - (Gen. 1:26-27 NIV)

"We see that Adam and Eve and all of mankind were never intended to die as is evident from the statement "in that day you eat, you shall surely die." But it doesn't say he didn't intend them to die but that they would if they ate.

"The question is raised, why would God tempt them on purpose? God did not tempt them" But he did for the definition of tempt is "to be inviting or attractive to" and the fruit was certainly that.

But what if Adam and Eve remained in their perfect state, immortal, as God? What if they remained in their innocent state knowing not difference between good and bad, naked and clothed? What if they knew not the knowledge and blessings of the trials this laboratory of life breeds?

Food for thought.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(100 days 15 hours ago.)

Hi Jeff, now this is good stuff :-)  Thanks for adding these thoughts/questions, as you know it's difficult to throw everything into one article. I struggled with how to keep this fairly long read from getting longer, so I was hoping someone would bring these things up. Thank you very much!
 
On the temptation thing - technically you are correct, by nature of putting the choice in front of them, the natural outcome was temptation. Perhaps the better word to use would be entice - God would never entice and woo someone to sin. As The scripture says, Satan and our own desires are what entices us.
 
As far as describing God, I was referring to His character mostly, but true, God came in the flesh through Christ Jesus. (John 1:1-14 - In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God... and the word became flesh and dwelt among us.) As the Scripture says, Jesus is the express image of God and the Nature of the Triune Godhead is displayed in the Father, The Son, and the Holy Spirit. (Colossians 2) God had to become man so that He could relate to us and so that we could relate to him (Galatians, Philippians, Hebrews, 1 & 2 Timothy)  So in detail, we as humans, being created in the image of God also have a triune nature - we are body, mind, and soul - as Jesus said, love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind. ( we could get technical between the mind/heart, soul/heart - but that could take forever too)
 
On Adam and Eve remaining sinless - this one is a biggy :-)  Again in technical terms, God wanted us to know the difference between God and Evil and the only way this would happen is by them eating of the fruit. This is where the freedom of choice - or free will sets in. The bible tells us God created evil, but it also tells us that we humans are the ones who put it into practice and set it in motion.  I don't think its an accident that children came after the fall and after they were banished from the garden. There are also several thoughts on this - but all conclude the same thing, we are all born in sin because of the original sin. So I think arguing over what came first, the chicken or the egg, is futile. The fact is, we have chickens and we have eggs :-) , nevertheless is fun to speculate as long as we don't make a doctrine and dig our heels in over something that isn't made clear in the Bible.
 
In order for us to truly have something to choose from, there has to be two opposing choices. See how this article could have been a lot longer? :-)  
 
Thanks again Jeff!   Blessings, Teresa

Respond to this comment
» left by Dr Clarence Rucker, Jr from MI (95 days 10 hours ago.)
Jeff, Man was created in both the image and likeness of God. An image is a representation or replica of one person or thing by another. An image may be similiar but not necessarily identical to its original. Likeness is used as a gauge of comparison, or analogy. When man fell, he retained an impaired image of God (Gen. 9:6)...(This was also the establishment of the human government 9:6).
 
Regaining the likeness of God is one of the accomplishments of salvation. Our spiritual likeness is restored in justification. Our character (those with faith) likeness is being continuously developed in the process of sanctification. We will only be like Christ physically when we are glorified. Our job today (those that are of faith) is to conform to the image of Christ, Rom. 8:29.  To make it easier, not all will understand, until their own life experience. If one has not experienced, there will be no understanding.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(95 days 10 hours ago.)

Good input! Thank you Clarence!

Respond to this comment
» left by Dr Clarence Rucker, Jr from MI (95 days 9 hours ago.)
I am with you Teresa. Just keep in mind and it is only one way to put it when you go Biblical, those without understanding and do not have the growth of faith will not understand. The Bible tells us that. Say your peace, pray to yourself and move on. It is in God's hands then. You have done your part. Those without knowledge will not understand, only questions.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(95 days 8 hours ago.)

Yes, Clarence, thank you, but I will only move on when God speaks to my heart. I am not so all knowing as to know who has understanding and who does not. I think back to all the people who only saw my hard outer shell and did have time to bother with all my questions. They lost an opportunity God lay before them. But praise God, a few saw past the outer and saw into the heart of one who was searching even though she was harsh on the outside.  I will never forget from where I came and I will never, no not ever be the first to end a discussion. That is simply not my call nor my style. I do appreciate your words and take them to heart. Lord bless you. Teresa

Respond to this comment
» left by Dr Clarence Rucker, Jr from MI (95 days 6 hours ago.)
OOPS! You missed my meaning, but I understand.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(92 days 16 hours ago.)

oops, sorry :-) I reread and I know where you are coming from now. :-)

Respond to this comment

» left by Ken McCreless (1,734)
Ken McCreless
(101 days 3 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Great lesson here, Sis.
 
So many aspects of the Spiritual realm are such a mystery, things we will not know until we move on.
 
Awesome!!

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(100 days 16 hours ago.)

Amen to that! Ever growing, ever learning! I love that the Bible never grows old. The word of God is living and active just like Hebrews tell us. It's amazing how every few months and years, a passage of Scripture will speak louder than before, teaching me something new and deepen my understanding of other passages. I get so excited when something clicks and I find myself flipping from passage to passage until I see how they connect to one another.  It's why I love to teach, because when others ask questions, it not only strengthens my faith, it challenges me to dig deep and prayer more intently. Keep reading and keep growing bro! Sis

Respond to this comment

» left by Philip Yaffe (790) (100 days 10 hours ago.)
28 July 2009
 
Dear Teresa,
 
You have done another masterly job of interpolating the blanks in the Bible concerning incest. But there are still gapping holes. Why was incest acceptable at one point and then banned? Please don't say that it was necessary at the beginning in order to populate the earth. If incest was repugnant to God, then certainly He could have found some other means. After all, God is God,
 
 
You say that birth defects related to incest did not exist until after the deliverance from Egypt, because until that time God had not declared it to be a sin. Does this mean that birth defects were related to the sin of incest as a means of dissuasion and punishment? I agree that a child born with a birth defect might bring grief to the parents and cause them to repent. But why must the child suffer? After all, he is the victim of the sin, yet he is condemned to live with the defect throughout his life. To me, this once again seems to be a case of God punishing the innocent and the guilty alike.
 
Regarding the temptation in the Garden of Eden, you say that, "In God's love and foreknowledge, he knew they would stray, so he warned them what would happen if they did, and he already had a plan in place to restore them to fellowship when they did." Since He knew they would stray, and therefore be punished, why create the situation in the first place?
 
You also state that "Eve was tempted by Satan, he planted thoughts in her head and told half-truths about God's intent in keeping them from eating the fruit . . . . In effect, she allowed the twisted lies of Satan to lead her thoughts to a place where she convinced herself that God must be keeping something good away from them." So Eve's disobedience was not due to her wilful decision to disobey but in large measure was due to the corrupting power of Satan. Surely God must have been aware that Satan was at work and that his power was great. Yet He did nothing to protect her from Satan's wiles. Why?
 
Regarding the question of why Adam and Eve's children were punished as well, you say, "The answer is as simple as looking at life today – if a woman were to drink alcohol and use drugs while pregnant, the child will suffer the consequences. They are not punished, but rather the unfortunate recipient of sinful behavior. Naturally speaking, they will have to do what they can to repair the damage caused by their mother." Quite correct; this is how the world we live in works. But we are talking about how the world we live in was created. God being God did not have to follow this path. He could have done whatever he wanted. For example, He could have expelled Adam and Eve from the Garden while letting their children return in order to enjoy the beneficence forfeited by their parents. But He didn't. Once again, this seems to be a case of the innocent suffering for the transgressions of the guilty.
 
You state, "The Bible clearly teaches that God is the Father; however, not everyone is his child, only his creation. It teaches that we are adopted as children through faith in Christ. Before Jesus was born, people became a child of God through faith in God and His coming Messiah." To have faith in His coming messiah, they would have needed to know about him. Were Adam and Eve, their children, their children's children, etc., aware of the coming of the messiah? It has been a long time since I have read the Bible, but I don't Genesis saying anything about it. Am I wrong?
 
Not to drone on, I have one last question. It is perhaps not of the same import as the foregoing, but it has been bothering me for some time. Why is nakedness equated with sin? Adam and Eve were naked in the Garden of Eden before eating of the tree. God had already commanded them to be fruitful and multiply, so presumably they had knowledge of their anatomical differences and what they were for. Yet immediately after eating of the tree, Adam was ashamed to be naked before God. Certainly God knew about nakedness, but he had created it. So what had changed?
 
Teresa, I very much appreciate the effort you are going to on my behalf. I am eagerly looking forward to our further exchanges.
 
Best regards,
 
Philip Yaffe

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(99 days 14 hours ago.)

Hi Philip, how are you today?  Thank you for reading and commenting. I will try to touch on every comment, I printed it out so hopefully I won't miss anything. :-) You ask some questions that would cause me and others to speculate on what God was thinking, so its tough, but going by the overall character of God and what we learn throughout the bible, I can give what I percieve as good reasoning. In the meantime, I am looking to my teachers to help in this area. I'll admit upfront, that these are not the usual kinds of questions I have received over my years of teaching, so please forgive me. I do hope they help in showing you and others the bottom line, and that is we all have a guilty conscience over things we have done in our lives and that is what we need to be forgiven of.
 
Okay - here it goes :-)
 
I tried to point out that incest as we know it today, did not exist then so it wasn't repugnant to God. I don't read were it is repugant to him now either, but rather, his purpose in having family relations was no longer needed as the earth was well populated. We have to start with the premise that God is perfect and loving, so therefore every thing he institutes has a perfect pupose.  You are absolutely right in saying that inter'family relations was not necessary for populating the earth, because God could have chosen any method he desired.  So no not necessary, but God's choice, the bible does not tell us why, but as I and many others see it, it was God's way of including his creation in the process. What a gift that he gave mankind to procreate. What a miracle it is to carry a child within! How perfect is that?!
 
Sorry for confusing you on the birth-defect issue, I have to go back a little further maybe. When Adam and Eve sinned, death and decay set in and they lost there pefected state. Many scientists have studied how the gene pool was once much purer than it is today, and continues to degress, more health issues and diseases today than even from 50 years ago. The Bible tells us (book of Romans) that the further we get from the initial creation, the further away we get from perfection, thus causing these kinds of issues.  Therefore, I believe in God's perfection and foresight, he commanded his people to turn away from this behavior, I think for two reasons; one -being further away from perfection, and two, and two the heart of man was more and more wicked and we read accounts of rape and molestation in the Bible. Therefore, it was no longer just the mutual consent of interfamily marriages (what we think of as incest today), but it was the unconsentual rape and molestation of family members. As I mentioned earlier, God created us with a conscience and in our conscience he created the natural ability to discern from right and wrong. The moral code, as Romans tells us is written in our hearts and minds - even those who do not believe in God know when they have done wrong. We all self-medicate - whether is through obessive work, anger problems, alcohol, whaterver we all find a way to cope with our conscience - but that guilt was disigned to bring us back to God. Adam and Eve did the same thing, they ran and hid, because their conscience brought guilt and shame.
 
As far as them recognizing there nakedness, and why that is associated with sin, I haven't a clue - perhaps it is because the sinful and lustful part of man that was birthed out of their disobedience would cause them to look at others who are naked in a unhealthy way - just look at pornography and how it has gone from bad to sadistic in nature in many ways. I know your thinking, why did God make temptation available in the first place? It goes back to creating man with a free will and freedom of choice, there must be something to choose from.
 
Eve did have the power to reject Satan's enticement, but as the scripture I quoted in the article, she gave in because she craved what it had to offer. They walked with God daily in the Garden. A rare privilege, all she had to do was call His name and we would have given her the strength to resist. The book of 1 & 2 Corinthians tells us that God always gives us a way of escape from temptation. I bet in your years, you know this to be true in your own life. The moments when two roads lay before you - sometimes you chose the wrong and sometimes you chose the right. Is this a fair assumption? It is true for me.
 
Punishing the children from access to the garden is what I think you are referring to? If this is so, you jumped ahead to part 3 :-), but in short, God made a way for man - Adam and Eve's children to us, to those after us - to be reconciled and one day those who accepted God's offer of reconsiliation will be returned to "eden" and be allowed to partake of the tree of life" Though the new Eden is Heaven or what ulitmately will be the new Earth ( all discussed in the book of Revelation).
 
Knowing about God the creator and his coming Messiah - Adam and Eve, as far as I can see, did not know of Messiah, but they had no need, they walked with God and for a long-time, there were no false gods, only the Creator God, so all those who foloowed Him were saved. Romans tells us we are accountable for what we know and that all created beings know there is a God by means of creation itself. The Israelite people knew of the need for sacrifice for sin to be atoned for and faith was always the key ingredient - because this faith led them (those who followed) to a life of obedience. But because of the sinful nature, they needed forgiveness. The prophets of God taught expicitly on the coming messiah - the One Lamb of God who would take away the sin of the world - the Man Christ Jesus, who would be God in the flesh. - So yes, the old testament people knew of the one true God and then subsecquently of His coming Messiah, to do away with the constant need for sacrifices. (Book of Hevrews)
 
This offer of reconciliation is available to ou and me, and every single person. Again, we accept the consequence of our sin, or we accept grace.  We may not like the way God instituted things, and thats okay, but then we can't complain the day we meet our maker, we have to accept the consequences of our choice not to chose Him.
 
I hope this helps some, more to come in part three.
 
Thank you for following along and giving me this opportunity. It is my privilege and honor to offer may help. May the Holy SPirit fill in the gaps and minister to your heart, which I believe He is. Blessings, looking forward to our next chat.
 
I encurage you to Read the book of Romans, The book of 1 & 2nd Corinthians. I know they will bring up more questions, but they also elborate on what we discussed here.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(99 days 13 hours ago.)

ops, Philip, one more thing lest I confuse you more...
 
Sin is sin simply because God is creator and we are the created and what he says goes. Although, the reason God tells us what is sin and makes a deed "sin" is  first and foremost out of love because he knows the damage certain behaviors will cause and he wants us spared from that. Ansd other times, the bible tells us if something is specifically an abomination to him, or repugnant as you put it.  He never said it interfamily marriage was repugnant to him. but other sexual relations he did.
 
Much like us as parents, we warn our children of the dangers that surround them. That does not mean we are tempting them to go try it, it means we want them to know why to stay away from it because we love them.
 
I know if I didn't tell my son not to touch the hot oven, he would be awefully mad at me if he did and burned himself.  The first thing he would say, is why didn't you tell me that was hot!  If he touches it, to test me to see if I am lying to him, or just trying to scare him, he would not be able to blame me, but he would still be left with  a burn. And still as his loving mom, I would not say I told you so, but I would go get the cooling ointment and make it better.
 
How much more a loving creator does for his creation.  I hope this helps.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(99 days 6 hours ago.)

Sorry for all the typos, my fingers couldn't keep up with my brain. :-)

Respond to this comment

» left by Lorrie Davids (7,496)
Lorrie Davids
(100 days 2 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
As always, Teresa, much study and research went into this Bible answer article. Thanks for sharing.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(99 days 15 hours ago.)

Thanks Lorrie, Im'a prayin' and I know you are too! I have a long way to go! T

Respond to this comment

» left by Michael Ramzy (641)
Michael Ramzy
(99 days 7 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
This article was a great read. Thanks for sharing your insight here. This has given me much to think about while I look at the clouds and wonder where the rain is. Thanks for writing this.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(99 days 6 hours ago.)

Hi Michael, thank you for reading, I am glad it has you looking up :-)
 
I am awed by God's power and majesty when I am standing on a cliff overlooking the ocean. I can only imagine how awesome the natural beauty of the world was before it was corrupted.  I can't say I am wondering where the rain is, but I could go for it being 10 degrees cooler where I am  :-)  Blessings to you! Teresa

Respond to this comment

» left by Philip Yaffe (790) (98 days 15 hours ago.)
30 July 2009
 
Dear Teresa,
 
Once again, thanks for all the time you are taking on my behalf. You are a pleasure to read.
 
Let me start off with a point of agreement. You say, "Sin is sin simply because God is creator and we are the created and what he says goes." OK, granted. I will try not to explore this question any further.
 
A number of your other statements leave me perplexed. I don't understand what you mean by "incest as we know it today did not exist then so it wasn't repugnant to God." Incest means sexual relationships, consensual or otherwise, between close relatives. Rape between brothers and sisters and parents and children still constitutes incest. I do not believe that Genesis says anything about the incest needed to populate the earth was always consensual. Could you please be more explicit about how incest today is fundamentally different from what it was then?
 
Could you please clarify something for me? You say that Eve had the power to reject Satan's enticement: "All she had to do was call His name and He would have given her the strength to resist." If I understand this correctly, if Eve had called on Him for help, she would not have fallen into sin. However, because she was either too bamboozled by Satan to know what she was doing or too weak to resist, God stood by and did nothing. Thus, she fell into sin, which then infected Adam, and ultimately all of humanity down the ages. Is this correct?
 
The discussion of the deteriorating gene pool also raises questions. If the gene pool started deteriorating because of Adam and Eve's sin, this must have been God's will. So if at a certain point He decided things had gone far enough, He could have easily stopped the process rather than proscribing the practice of incest. I do not question why He chose the one means over the other. But it does rather make you think. Also, birth defects occur in the children of people have no close family relationships, but do not always occur in the children of people who do. Again food for thought.
 
Your suggestion why nakedness is associated with sin is intriguing. You say, "Perhaps it is because the sinful and lustful part of man that was birthed out of their disobedience would cause them to look at others who are naked in an unhealthy way." Nakedness became sinful at the time of Adam and Eve; there was no one else around for them to look at. Likewise for their children and their children's children. They were supposed to engage in sexual relationships to populate the earth, for which nakedness is required.
 
Since you made use of modern science to discuss the deterioration of the gene pool, I will make use of modern science with regard to nakedness. I believe that most sociological studies show that there is considerably less lust and illicit sex (if that is what you mean by looking at others who are naked in an unhealthy way) among nudists than other groups. For them, nakedness is not a stimulant, just an everyday fact of life. Some years ago, I visited Nairobi, capital of Kenya, during the country's Independence Day celebration. As part of the festivities, people were brought in from a remote bush village to perform tribal dance. In their region it was normal for women to be bare-breasted. However, in order not to offend the sensibilities of the spectators, the dancers were required to cover up. I have never seen anything so incongruous as grass-skirted woman wearing pristine white brassieres. The effect, of course, was to draw attention to precisely that which otherwise would have gone largely unnoticed.
 
If being adopted as a child of God before the birth of Jesus required both faith in God and faith in His coming Messiah, I agree that because Adam and Eve had walked with God daily in the Garden, they were probably exempt. But what about their children, their children's children, etc.? As best I recall, Genesis says nothing about them ever having walked with God or indeed had any other direct relations with Him. So how did they fulfill the requirement?
 
 
Regarding sin and punishment, you say, "We warn our children of the dangers that surround them. That does not mean we are tempting them to go try it, it means we want them to know why to stay away from it because we love them." True. No problem. But the example you provided is pallid by many orders of magnitude.
 
"I know if I didn't tell my son not to touch the hot oven, he would be awfully mad at me if he did and burned himself. The first thing he would say, is why didn't you tell me that was hot! If he touches it to test me to see if I am lying to him, or just trying to scare him, he would not be able to blame me, but he would still be left with a burn. And still as his loving mom, I would not say I told you so, but I would go get the cooling ointment and make it better."
 
As his loving mom, would you leave a pan of boiling water on the stove and tell your son not to touch it because if it fell on him, he might be scaled and disfigured for life? Of course not! You would either remove the pan or ensure that he couldn't get to it. You certainly wouldn't stand by and do nothing. Yet when Eve moved toward the tree to eat its fruit, with consequence much more serious than being scaled and disfigured, God stood by and did nothing. This hardly seems like an act of love. What am I missing?
 
Finally, you say that "God made a way for man - Adam and Eve's children to us, to those after us - to be reconciled and one day those who accepted God's offer of reconciliation will be returned to Eden and be allowed to partake of the tree of life." This would be great news, except for the fact that in order to be reconciled it is first necessary to be estranged. Adam and Eve were estranged through disobedience, but what did their children do to deserve estrangement? More directly, what did I do to become estranged? The concept that I was born sinful because of the transgressions of two people who lived hundreds of generations ago is difficult for me to comprehend. It has been a key question throughout my life, and still is. However, you say you will deal with this issue in Part III. I am very much looking forward to reading it.
 
Kind regards,
 
Phil

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(98 days 13 hours ago.)

Hi Philip, big smiles, thanks for starting with a point of agreement. :-) 
 
What I mean by incest not being then what it is today (and since God declared it forbidden) is just that it wasn't incest. I wasn't thought "wrong" - this goes back to sin being sin simply because God declared it so.  I apologize for more sorely lacking feeble attempt to explain myself.  I have no other way of explaining it. :-)  I am sure many others can give different or better insight, (answersingenesis dot com - or equipthesaints dot com). I think the bottom line is God chose to give two people the task of procreation and then told his people not to do it anymore, I don't know when the word "incest" came about. But again, it goes back to sin being sin, simply because he made it so.  I think ultimately, it comes down to knowing God is in charge in His infinite wisdom this is the method he chose.  The book of Romans talks about accountablity to God when things are made known to us and before God declared it wrong, it wasn't wrong.
 
 
Birth defects happen, I think as a natural consequence of our decaying bodies due to original sin. Romans talks about everything being affected - all creation because of the fall of man, this speaks to the power that God gave man when he gave him dominion over all things, but gave that up. So you are right, in this respect it can affect anyone for no apparent reason.  -- God point on God deciding enough is enough - He addressess that in the 2 Peter Scripture I quoted.
 
God knows the beginning from the end - he knows how many people throughout all time will acccept him by answering his call - He in his grace, is giving every last person (only he knows who that is) an opprtunity to repent. Romans says, in the fullness of time - for Gentiles (everyone other than the Jews) and the Jews, he is no respector of persons and loves all the world as John 3:16 - he will return and restore things perfect order and all believers throughout time will have fellowship with him in heaven (or new earth after the final judgement day for non believers.)
 
As far as nakedness, I was limited in my explanation - certainly not all cultures or people of cultures think "bad" thoughts", however some do. All I know is God made coverings for them so he must have had a good reason. And the way some people act toward it is evidence enough for me. Like I said, I have no idea, just throwing my thoughts out. :-)
 
We read in Genesis five about the Godly line of Seth - to Noah, and Noah's son's carrying the knowledge of God and following his ways, so though they may not have seen him as Adam and Eve did, He made himself known to them and men followed him, so again, they were only accountable for what they knew Romans 1-6 deals with this indepthly. God is just and says he will make himself known to every person who walks the earth at some point before they die - and then we are accountable for the decision we make.
 
Going back to the temptation Adam and Eve's children receiving the consequence of a sinful nature and exile from the Garden --
 
With respect, I think you are missing the idea or point of free will and freedom of choice. My example of the stove may not have been the best; but the idea is the same. Choice.
 
If God took away the tree of knowledge of good and evil and only the acceptable trees were left, they would not have real freedom to choose, and if no freedom to choose, no need to excersise free will. God wanted a relationship based on choice. and we as humans feel the same, If you were the only man alive and all the women wanted you, do they really have a choice? Do they want you because they are attracted to you? what do they have to compare you to? We could get technical and say that God didn't have to create us at all, or he could have made out without freewill, but what would be the point? God doesn't need us, He wants us. Bottom line is again, He is God and we are not, he designed free will, so we use it.
 
If Adam and Eve's children were born in their perfected state, allowed to be in the Garden, the process would begin all over again, they too would have the choice to choose to obey or disobey, they would probably choose to disobey just like their parents did. We read that God gave Cain an opportunity to repent and have his relationship restored with God after killing Abel, we also read that God talked to Cain about the thoughts that God knew where in his heart and gave him an opportunity to make the better choice. He chose murder., so though they were born with a sinful nature, the still had the freedom to choose God and His good.
 
It is the same with us, there is no escaping the fact that we were all born with a sinful nature and we have to be be born again spiritually for restoration with God. I appreciate your getting to the bottom line in dealing with You personally, because more important of how and why we all were subject to the sin of adam and eve is that we are, and we are responsible to God for our own actions, not anyone elses. I agree, it is a hard concept to comprehend, but we don't have to comprehend it to know it is true. Because if it were not true, you would not have a guilty conscience over the bad things you have done (any one - not just you specifically).  And really, it comes down to this, if you were Adam, do you think you would have not eaten of the fruit? Would you have had the will to resist?  I don't think I would. We have control to change the state in which you were born, so we really can't use Adam and Eve as an excuse- In effect, we all have the knowledge of the tree of good and evil.
 
I will talk about the concept of reconciliation and God's perfect and permisive will and how it relates to freedom of choice. I too am enjoying our conversations.
 
Blessings for a good day! Teresa
 

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(98 days 12 hours ago.)

Hi Again,  I added a link at the bottom of the article to an article and website that does a better job than me explaining some of your concerns. Don't think I am turning you away :-),  just adding helps :-)  I am loving our exchange and others who may add along the way :-)

Respond to this comment

» left by Philip Yaffe (790) (97 days 18 hours ago.)
31 July 2009
 
Dear Teresa,
 
I am very much looking forward to Part III of your series. In anticipation, I have one brief comment and one question concerning your latest message.
 
Concerning nakedness. As you say, if God has declared nakedness a sin, then it is a sin. No question, no disagreement. Nevertheless, it is curious that labelling nakedness a sin seems to have led to a deterioration of the human condition, rather than an improvement.
 
Concerning Cain. You say, "We read that God gave Cain an opportunity to repent and have his relationship restored with God after killing Abel." I can't find mention of this in my Bible. It is in French, so perhaps something was lost in translation. Could you please direct me to the relevant verse? Thanks.
 
Kind regards,
 
Phil

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(97 days 15 hours ago.)

Hi Philip, thank you again for sticking with me. Again I didn't explain myself very well - I want you to know that God is teaching me through you and is showing me how to think ahead as to how others might think. I am truly thankful for you.
 
I don't believe that the act being naked itself is sin, oh my - all of us would be sinning everytime we took a shower :-),  but I do believe it is how we use our nakedness. When Adam and Eve were given coverings, it was not so that they would never be able to be naked in front of eachother, but it was to teach them the appropriate times -( ultilizing the knowledge of good and evil - remember the tree itsself wasn't evil, the fruit released the knowledge of it)  in preparation for when their children would come along. I believe this because in 1 Peter we are told that the marriage bed is undefiled and in the song of Solomon and 1 Corinthians that in marriage we have the freedom to enjoy each other in that way whenever and however (except in a harmful or nonmutual kind of way.)  The Bible also tells us not to use our bodies to tempt others. (1 Thessalonians)
 
The conversation with Cain can be found in Gen chapter 4. Here is a little bit of it to help you find your way to it in the French Bible. (Still read all of chapter 4)
 
"...but he (God) did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell. So the LORD said to Cain, "why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen?" "If you do well, will you not be accepted" And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door, and its desire is for you, but you should rule over it" Genesis 4:5 - 7
 
God knew Cains thoughts and knew that his offering was coming from an arrogant heart, that is why it was not accepted, when Cain got angry, God reached out to him to warn him that if he does not change his thinking, it will lead him to sin (kill his brother). He offered Cain an escape from sin, and told him that he has the ability to rule over it.
 
Then later after Cain killed his brother, Again God called out to him - "What is this you have done" VS. 9-10, giving him a opportunity to repent, but instead he gives God a bad attitude by sayng "I'm not my brothers keeper".  It was Cains unwillingness to repent that led to his punishment/consequence of being sent out of the land, but it was also God's grace because He knew Cain would not be safe,he no doubt angered other family members for doing this - can you imagine the first murder? How they must have felt? Even after all of this, God put a mark over cain that no one should avenge Abel by killing Cain. That is grace! You might ask, why did God not stop Cain from muderdering Abel? It goes back to freedom of choice, if God stopped him, he would take away his freedom of choice. Abel was the victim of Cains free will to chose evil over good. Abel was "saved", Cain was not because he never repented, but intead went on to have a family line of evil doers and they did not respect or reach out to God.  I hope this helps :-)
 
I should have part 3 done by Sunday. Blessings to you! Teresa
 
 

Respond to this comment

» left by Laura Trahan (39,015)
Laura Trahan
(97 days 12 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Teresa-I love how timely your writings always are! As always, great research! It did remind me how kids see this story. My son just started his own quest of reading through the Bible. he came out the other night in shock because he always thought God killed Adam. I was shocked how he got that. "He said if you ate from the tree you would surely die," his response. In telling the story, it was always left off about the banishment. this of course provided great discussion, but it made me realize that his view of God was skewed to think that he would kill Adam. He is only 8, but I wonder how misreadings of little things like "God tempting Adam" does skew our view of who God really is. Thanks for clearing this misconception up! Love ya lots, Laura

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(97 days 3 hours ago.)

Hi Laura, thank you for the encouraging words. Yay for your son!  What a blessing that it stirred conversation. I am so glad this was able to assist!  Love you lots too! T

Respond to this comment

» left by Philip Yaffe (790) (96 days 14 hours ago.)
1 August 2009
 
 
Dear Teresa,
 
 
The English and French Bible's do not seem to be in agreement. Using your Bible, you say that God called out to Cain, "What is this you have done?" Cain replied, "I'm not my brother's keeper." My Bible puts the events in a different order. The Lord said to Cain, "Where is Abel, your brother?" Cain replied, "I don't know. Am I my brother's keeper?" Then the Lord said: "What have you done?" Is there some way of determining which version is correct?
 
 
Best regards,
 
 
Phil

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(96 days 14 hours ago.)

Hi Philip, I'm sorry, I did not mean to confuse you, I was only giving you a starting point to find the story, only quoted verse 6-7 and then telling you what to look for next.
 
The English bible reads the same order - here it is  - quoting exact from verse 8-11
 
"Now Cain talked with Abel his borther; and it came to pass, when they were in the filed that Can rose uup against Abel his brother and killed him. Then the LORD said to Cain, 'Where is Abel your brother?' He said, "I do not know. Am I my borther's keeper"' And He said, " what is this you have done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground. So now you are cursed from the eath which has opene its mouth to receive your brother's blood by your hand."
 
I believe this is the same order your French Bible should read. 
 
See how God called out to Cain, giving him an opportunity to repent? When he chose instead to have a bad attitude about it, God pressed him one more time, when he still chose not to confess, God told Cain what he did, (pronounced the case against him) then gave him his punishement (much like what happens in a court of law) In this, Cain had no excuses and could not blame God for his own actions. 
 
As we continue in the story, we move down to verse 15 - it should read, "and the LORD said to him, "Therefore whoever kills Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold." And the LORD set a mark on Cain, lest anyone finding him should kill him." 
 
In this verse we see God's grace and protection over Cain despite his actions. That mark was not a mark of a curse, like some assume, it was a mark of protection.  It is interesting to to note the in the beginning God set a mark for grace, and in the end (book of Revelation) their continues to be a mark of grace.
 
I hope this helps. :-)
 

Respond to this comment

» left by Philip Yaffe (790) (96 days 10 hours ago.)
1 August 2009
 
Dear Teresa,
 
Yes, it helps to know that the two Bible's are in agreement on the text. But I find a problem with the interpretation.
 
If God's question, "Where is Abel, your brother?" was an offer to repent, in all humility I believe that if I had been Cain, I would not have recognized it as such. True, he could have spontaneously confessed, which he didn't, so perhaps this could be interpreted as a first offer. However, I see nothing that would indicate a second offer. Cain answers the question, "I do not know. Am I my brother's keeper?" God responds, "What is this you have done? The voice of your brother's blood cries out to Me from the ground. So now you are cursed from the earth which has opened its mouth to receive your brother's blood by your hand." This sounds like an indictment and judgement, not a second chance.
 
What am I missing?
 
 
Regards,
 
Phil

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(96 days 10 hours ago.)

Hi philip, I think it is what we mean by the word repent - I see it in a doctrinal and practical way; practical in that any time someone asks us a question (when we know they already know the answer) it means we have an opportunity to be honest and respond the way they are hoping we will. (Actually, the better word is confess.) So I see this as the first chance,  Then later when God says, "what is this you have done?", even though God finishes his statement Cain still could have repented (doctrinally) in admiting what he did was wrong and that he truly felt sorry for what he did.) God would have forgiven him. Instead Cain replied, (in vs 13) "my punishment is greater than I can bear!", this is not a man who was sorry for what he did, he is a man who is sorry he got caught and has to deal with the punishment."  True, there was no turning back from his punishment, which was to leave -- the physical and tangible consquences of our choices cannot be changed. (think about how the things we do affect others). But remember there is the spiritual (most important) aspect as well, and Cain chose to leave his spirit in a state of death because he chose not to repent. Instead he left the Lord's presence, not sorrowful and chosing to live better, but to be worse and not raise his children to follow God. Confession and repentance go together, so I was using these words interchangably. I am working on making myself clearer :-)
 
Remember, before Cain made his choice, God told him to rule over the thoughts that would lead him to sin. And remember, God told him, if you do well, will you not be accepted? This was not a one time offer. It is evident through out the entire bible and in countless other scenarios.
 
As long as we have breath we have an opportunity to repent and turn to God, but once we breathe our last breath, we have sealed our fate.
 

Respond to this comment
» left by Dr Clarence Rucker, Jr from MI (95 days 9 hours ago.)
Philip, I just want to echo Teresa, REPENT. This means to give up ways of the old and turn on to ways of the new. Make a complete turnaround in the attitude of the heart, make a complete turnaround in the attitude of the heart of the mind, becoming another mind. Keeping in mind that anything learned can be unlearned. We have learned ways of this world, now learn ways of God. It is like taking the old clothes off and putting on new or clean clothes.
 
The ways of this world is corrupt, mothers lay with sons, fathers lay with daughters, men marrying men, women marrying women, parents brutalizing children, children brutalizing parents. Man's love for dogs should be the love going to their brothers. One woman said: "A dog is man's best friend?" "Then she answered hat about me, the woman?" Those of faith have to live in this world, but we do not have to adhere to the wrong of this world. EX: A man will kill his brother...A man of faith will make peace with his brother. Hate your neighbor and steal from him says the world. Man of faith says love thy neighbor and give him if he needs help. When you repent, certain so-called friends will leave you. Why? You do not do what they do anymore. They will talk about you. That is when you know you are different. He still drinks, and you do not want him to see you drink or you do not drink.
 
God did not tempt Adam and Eve. It was a free will obedience that they both missed. Obedience. Faith is the confident obedience in the word of God regardless of the circumstances and/or consequences. This is the Noah faith. Man that do not want to be obedient sticks with: "faith is the substance of things hoped for and the evidence of things not seen." Each has to be placed in its own priority.

Respond to this comment
» left by Dr Clarence Rucker, Jr from MI (94 days ago.)
When we say, "Second Chance." Are we trying to say, God forgives sin but you have to pay the debt for that sin. (Remember David left God and went into Bathesheba? The debt was paid by, David's daughter was raped by her brother, another brother then killed him, and David's Nephew Killed that Brother. David's son with Bathesheba died. After the sin debt was paid, then came Solomon.) Did I do good or did I miss it?

Respond to this comment

» left by Jeanine Mathis (174) (95 days 1 hour ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Very good explanation that God does not tempt us to sin. I also liked that you included the gospel message.

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(92 days 16 hours ago.)

Hi Jeanine, thank you for reading. I think adding the basic message of the gospel is imporant as well. Blessings to you! Teresa

Respond to this comment

» left by Jeanine Mathis (174) (92 days 13 hours ago.)
Dr. Rucker, God forgives the debt of our sin, paid for by Jesus. God doesn't add on extra debts, otherwise we would say that Jesus's death on the cross wasn't enough, and we know it was enough to cover our sin. God does discipline those He loves though.
 
 
Hebrews 12:6
 
 
FOR THOSE WHOM THE LORD LOVES HE DISCIPLINES,AND HE SCOURGES EVERY SON WHOM HE RECEIVES."

Respond to this comment

» left by John Holmes from United Kingdom (36 days 9 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 0.5 out of 5
I just wondered why God decided to go through the process of creating mankind knowing that he would sin and this would result in all the terrible suffering since the fall that in recent years has seen around 150 million men, women and children exterminated by communist and fascist for what! It also seems rather stupid to suggest that God knows who will respond to his call and yet he has to wait for them to do so. Why? We are told that Christ will return to reign for a thousand years and then the devil will be releast again for a short period before there will be a new  heaven and earth created. All this seems to be a waste of time when God already knows that he will create a new heaven and earth and he already knows who will/will not be in it.
Believe it or not but I do have faith but feel it is being made rather complicated by all the experts and all those who cannot see that we have all been born in enemy territory and are in need of saving and that is why we have the bible and God sent his only Son into the world. This, in my humble opinion, is support by the following from 1 John which seems to imply that God held the devil responsible for all that has happened. 1 John 8 He that committeh sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifest, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 
This does not say that God will only destroy the works of the devil in some and we know for certain that 'God wills that all men will come to repentance' albeit he will not compel them to do so.
Just one final point we read in Romans that Paul claimed that God granted him mercy as he acted out of ignorance and unbelief and this surely is the state we are all born in and need saving from.
John

Respond to this comment
» left by Teresa Ortiz (11,099)
Teresa Ortiz
(34 days 14 hours ago.)

Hi John, I think the simplest answer is that He created us to have fellowship with him and Just as the bible says it was for the Joy that was set before Him that He endured the shame and the cross. We are the joy! Life is a gift. Even though some choose to live in and practice evil. And the Scriptures you quote answer your question as well. In the end God will destroy the works of the devil - in the lake of fire. God is patient, waiting for all those who would come to repentance for all time until the very last person accepts His gift of salvation. Only God knows the day and the hour, but the signs are all around us. Did you know that of the 2500 prophecies in Scripture, 2000 have been fulfilled - to the letter?!  Most of the remaining 500 are found in the book of Revelation and some we are in the midst of now.  Time is drawing near. If the first 2000 where right on, I am willing to bet the last 500 will be as well.
 
Thanks so much for reading and for your input. Blessings to you! Teresa

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 608 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 7/27/2009 10:49:42 AM.
View other articles written by Teresa Ortiz (11,014)
Teresa Ortiz


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Did God Purposely Tempt Adam and Eve - Answers to Biblical Questions Part 2

Fight The Good Fight Of Faith

Submit to God, Resist the Devil... and He Will Flee From You!

Renewing Your Mind

Three Important Reasons to Study the Bible

Prayer Still Works Miracles The Fervent, Effectual Prayer of a Righteous Man Avails Much.

How to Use the God-Given Spiritual Authority At Home

Did Saint Peter, the Apostle, Really Write His Two Letters in the Bible?

Beth Moore Makes Move To Reach Men

Dream Big Dreams... And See Them Fulfilled

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.281.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company