Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,191 Authors
71,897 Quality Articles
& 4,846 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Joel Hendon (18,637)
Sandra E. Graham (10,088)
Steve Kovacs (4,119)
Linda DeWitt (1,955)
Edward Rhymes (8,802)
Brianna Popsickle (2,452)
Teresa Ortiz (11,094)
Julian Price (13,305)
Stephany Springer (41,414)
Abigail Richards (9,854)
E. Raymond Rock (3,087)
Terry Mitchell (5,358)
Mark Parsec (16,695)
Nenita Wells (2,071)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Feds Challenge States' Sovereignty

Things That Infringe on Free Speech

Plessy, the 14th Amendment & Big Business

Carry or Not to Carry. Now thats a question!

Let's Expand Fifth Amendment Rights

The 28th Amendment

Freedom of Speech

Fed Negates New Gun Rights Laws Passed in Tennessee and Montana

Why the 17th Amendment Should Be Repealed

The First Amendment and Racism: Do Racists Have the Right to Free Speech?

Home » Categories » Government » Constitutional Issues » Freedom of Speech » Reprint Rights » Printer Friendly

Missing Link

Freedom of Speech

Rated 4.5 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Missing Link
Submitted Monday, August 03, 2009
Missing Link (679)
Missing Link


Log in to become a member of Missing Link's Fan Club!


Beware the dim-witted false patriots who ignorantly declare unpatriotic anyone who should dare to question critically any aspect of our country.  It is a narrow, limited mind whose best argument is "Love it, or leave it".

Our country was founded on freedom, freedom that most expressly protects the right to express ourselves.

It is a curious paradox that people who declare someone unpatriotic for expressing a dissenting point of view would also reject the violence perpetrated in countries such as Iran against their people for doing so. 

These people use a warped argument that because we do not (usually) beat people with sticks or (usually) shoot them or imprison them for openly dissenting, that nobody in the US should be dissenting.  Their reaction to dissent is to declare that dissention here is unwanted and even a cause to suggest lack of national loyalty.

How can one simultaneously decry the cruelty and injustice of leaders in the world who violently suppress dissension and then turn to our fellow citizens and tell them love it or leave it?

I think it is a sign of the failure of our educational system to teach children to use their critical thinking skills that the best argument many people have is "shut the hell up".  It shows an intellectual weakness that may be prone to perversion by verbose talking heads, virulent leadership, or an evil and charismatic political personality.

If Americans have lost the ability to think and express themselves critically, to engage in informed dialogue that intelligently argues with a clear understanding of all sides of the issues, then we have failed our ancestors who came here to give us freedom from being told what to think and believe.

If citizens are derided as unpatriotic for expressing a point of view that asks questions about the status quo and group-think of the country, then we aren't any better off than the countries we criticize and we are just a baton swing away from their level.  If debate is unpatriotic, we have already lost the precious freedom of expression that fuels informed argumentation so healthy to our political system.

So let's not be lazy in our argumentation Americans.  Let's take the time to understand all sides of an issue so we are prepared to argue our position clearly, intelligently and convincingly.  Let's lay out our argument, listen to each other and work through differences without questioning the patriotism of those with dissenting points of view.  To restrict freedom, now that is unpatriotic.

"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."

 George Washington



tweet this!

The author of this article has chosen to make this article available with free reprint rights.
Click here to copy this article.

Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Missing Link's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by David Tanguay (9,519)
David Tanguay
(102 days 16 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Yes we should never deprive people the right to speak what they believe. For our country was founded by people who rebelled against a monarchy. Without freedom of speech our constitution would never have been written. "good article"

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (102 days 13 hours ago.)
Thanks David! ML

Respond to this comment

» left by Michael Ramzy (663)
Michael Ramzy
(102 days 9 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Very well done. Freedom of speech is our most basic right. Many people, from both sides of the aisle, forget that just because we don't agree with something doesn't mean it shouldn't be said. All opinions are relevant to someone. Discussion, debate and dissention go hand-in-hand with that freedom we should all preserve.

Respond to this comment

» left by Steven Rogers (2,293)
Steven Rogers
(100 days 16 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
I think this maybe the first time we agree on something. You have very eloquently made a very good point>We are in a great country because of the ability of our citizens to say what they wish, to disagree as you and I have on several occasions, and to try and change the system for the better. All which is why the liberal "fairness doctrine” is such a farce. What right does the government have to tell us what and how much can be said? It is one thing to expect news media to try and be unbiased but to tell a specific radio station that if it carries rush it must also carry say Ed Shultz or vice versa is ridiculous! Thank you for making this point so clearly

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (100 days 16 hours ago.)
AMEN! Common ground!
ML

Respond to this comment

» left by Robert Melaccio, Sr. (5,120)
Robert Melaccio, Sr.
(99 days 11 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Missing, great job, exactly the point, if good men do nothing, etc. Even Christians are encouraged to speak out but many of them think they can't be righteously angry.

Respond to this comment

» left by Anonymous (99 days 11 hours ago.)
Thank you Robert!
 
ML

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 1,660 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 8/3/2009 11:30:20 PM.
View other articles written by Missing Link (679)
Missing Link


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
The 28th Amendment

Just Because a Freedom Exists, Should We Use That Freedom To Its Full Potential?

Freedom of Speech

The First Amendment and Racism: Do Racists Have the Right to Free Speech?

Constitutional Rubbish

Gang-Stalking / Domestic Terrorism

Three Cheers for the U.S. Supreme Court

The Use of the Atomic Bomb on Japan - Great or Grave

Plessy, the 14th Amendment & Big Business

Is a Blogger a Journalist? House says No!

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.047.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company