Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,196 Authors
71,938 Quality Articles
& 3,824 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Edward Rhymes (9,204)
Julian Price (12,254)
Dianne Lehmann (5,838)
Fran Larson (20,012)
Gregory Lewis (1,456)
Ira Coffin (13,580)
Joel Hendon (18,567)
Sandra E. Graham (9,984)
Shari Vaudo (1,123)
Steve Kovacs (4,352)
Linda DeWitt (2,026)
Brianna Popsickle (2,389)
Teresa Ortiz (11,014)
Stephany Springer (41,216)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Could George P. Bush Be The Future of The Republican Party?

Conservatives Have One Good Reason to be Frustrated

Reaction to Thesis is Quite Telling

Lie, Cheat and Steal

A visit to 2032

Pray for Your Leaders

I'm confused

Letters To Lindsey

My Song

The View From The Right - April 9, 2009

Home » Categories » Government » Conservatism » Reaction to Thesis is Quite Telling » Printer Friendly

Terry Mitchell

Reaction to Thesis is Quite Telling

Rated 4 out of 5
No Reader Ratings Available ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Terry Mitchell
Submitted Friday, September 04, 2009
Terry Mitchell (5,334)
Terry Mitchell

http://commenterry.blogs.com
Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!


Recently-published portions of Virginia gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell's 1989 graduate thesis have created a major uproar in the mainstream media. They are particularly outraged at McDonnell's assertion that government should favor married couples over "cohabitators, homosexuals, or fornicators." For the life of me, I cannot fathom why this would this would be such a horrible thing. Yet we are told by the pundits that these views are "not mainstream." One popular news magazine even referred to them as "bizarre."

In addition, many individuals have responded in typical knee-jerk fashion, stating that they prefer to "keep the government out of my bedroom," an obvious inference that McDonnell favors forced limitations on their privacy rights. But that's nothing but a red herring. Rights are not the issue here. McDonnell wasn't talking about taking away the rights of adults to have consensual sex with whomever they choose. And he wasn't endorsing any kind of employment opportunity discrimination against gays and those who are living in sin.

All he was saying is that the government shouldn't condone the lifestyles of homosexual couples or those heterosexual couples who are "shacking up" by bestowing upon them the same privileges that were once reserved for married couples. Remember, privileges are different from rights, which are inalienable and cannot be arbitrarily given or taken away by the government. Certainly one's private life, no matter how distasteful or ungodly, does not justify government denial of his or her rights. However, the government is well within its authority to distribute privileges as determined by the people's elected representatives.

Also, keep in mind that just because people have the right to do certain things, doesn't mean they should expect to be free from condemnation for such. No one protests when we malign acts such as murder, theft, rape, child molestation, and fraud. However, criticism of personal sexual immorality is often met with a tumultuous and hysterical response. That's a sure indicator of a depraved society. And this is not just a criticism of liberals. Many so-called conservatives – who have an undying love affair with Rush Limbaugh and swear by Fox News – are as likely to consider premarital/extramarital sex "normal" as their liberal neighbor down the street.

There's more to conservatism than attending "tea parties," shouting down others at townhall meetings, and taking a stand for a strong national defense, smaller government, and lower taxes. When conservatives blend with the culture, they are no more moral than leftwing nut jobs like Keith Olbermann. While those of Olbermann's ilk have sharply criticized the thesis, members of McDonnell's own Republican Party have made little or no effort to defend the merits of the arguments he laid out 20 years ago. Instead, they have been busy trying to change the subject while pointing out the weaknesses of the Democratic candidate, Creigh Deeds.

I was indifferent toward McDonnell until I heard about this. His strong moral stance gave me cause to consider enthusiastically supporting him – for a while, anyway. Predictably and unfortunately, though, McDonnell is now kowtowing to political correctness and backing down from those "controversial" remarks he penned in his thesis. In fact, he's backpedaling faster than a circus clown. Instead of standing firm for what is right, he is apparently willing to sell his soul to get elected, thereby falling in line behind nearly every other modern politician. Too bad.


Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, amateur political analyst, and blogger from Virginia, USA. He posts a least one article a day to his blog - http://commenterry.blogs.com - on subjects such as current events, politics, technology, society and culture, religion, health and well-being, self improvement, personal finance, trivia, and sports.
 
You can now have any article and blog post he writes – in advance, if you would like – for use in your book, newspaper, magazine, ezine, newsletter, website, or whatever!! This includes the thousands of articles and blog posts he's previously written. Contact him via this website or his blog for details.   



tweet this!



Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of Terry Mitchell's Fan Club!

Comments on this article:


» left by Anonymous (55 days 9 hours ago.)
Reader Rating: 5 out of 5
Actions have consequences and it is time we voters hold those elected accountable. Thanks for writing this outspoken and well spoken piece! It packs a punch! Marijo (Mary Jo)

Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (5,586)
Terry Mitchell
(55 days 4 hours ago.)

Marijo, thanks for your kind and encouraging words.

Respond to this comment

» left by Jean Horst (1,196)
Jean Horst
(52 days 4 hours ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
Terry,
 
I think this whole over-sensitivity thing has gotten so far out of hand. The level of drama these days is overwhelming. Everyone just needs to take a deep breath and calm down. Folks are entitled to their opinions - just because someone else's is different is not a reason to start such a big deal. The current atmosphere reminds me of two kids in the back seat of a car doing that "she touched me first" routine. How do we get that to happen? Is it possible?

Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (5,586)
Terry Mitchell
(51 days 18 hours ago.)

Jean, you are exactly right. This kind of over-sensitivity, as you put it, is rampant these days - on both sides of the political spectrum. If you listen to the radical left, you would think Bob McDonnell's thesis was advocating Sharia Law in the United States. Or when any anyone voices an opinion against gay marriage, they are accused of homophobia. And then the wacko right would have us think that President Obama was wanting to use his his back-to-school speech today to indoctrinate children with socialist views. Give me a break! I'm getting tired of all the silliness.

Respond to this comment

» left by Gregory Lewis (298)
Gregory Lewis
(20 hours 4 minutes ago.)

Reader Rating: 4 out of 5
   New Comment!   
"Recently-published portions of Virginia gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell's 1989 graduate thesis have created a major uproar in the mainstream media."
 
So, you listen to mainstream media? Or, mainstream media commenting on other mainstream media? I must be out of that loop.
 
I'm reminded of something from calculus, which I did very poorly at, by the way, about primes and primes of primes, etc. It's like the present phenomenon of commentary on commentary: "That commentary on the commentary was an outrage!"
 
- G

Respond to this comment
» left by Terry Mitchell (5,586)
Terry Mitchell
(19 hours 16 minutes ago.)

   New Comment!   
I think I know where you're coming from. One should read what a person actually wrote before passing judgment - instead of depending on what somebody wrote about what they wrote.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 46 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 9/4/2009 7:16:21 AM.
View other articles written by Terry Mitchell (5,334)
Terry Mitchell


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Could George P. Bush Be The Future of The Republican Party?

Conservatives Will Vote for John McCain Anyway; Here is Why

Examining Causality: Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals?

Lie, Cheat and Steal

My Definition Of A Liberal

Open Letter to John McCain

Giving Limbaugh A Second Look

How Right is Your Conservative Commentator

Sarah Palin: A Pit Bull in Geek Sheik?

Conservatives Have One Good Reason to be Frustrated

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.063.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company