Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,189 Authors
71,918 Quality Articles
& 5,603 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Dianne Lehmann (5,738)
Ira Coffin (12,696)
Joel Hendon (18,637)
Sandra E. Graham (10,088)
Shari Vaudo (453)
Steve Kovacs (4,119)
Linda DeWitt (1,955)
Edward Rhymes (8,802)
Brianna Popsickle (2,452)
Teresa Ortiz (11,094)
Julian Price (13,305)
Stephany Springer (41,414)
Abigail Richards (9,854)
E. Raymond Rock (3,087)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
A Case For Electric Cars: Part 4 - The Future

A Case For Electric Cars: Part 3 - Alternatives

A Case For Electric Cars: Part 2 - Cost Factor

Cash For Clunkers Alternative - Convert Your Clunker and Save Your Cash

Are Electric Car Conversion Kits Realistic For You and Me - Here Are the Latest Developments

The Electric Car Conversion Kit is Dead - 5 Lessons From the Front Line of Electric Car Conversions

Will I Get Better Fuel Efficiency Driving with the Air Conditioner On or Off?

Riversimple the Open Source Hydrogen car

Advantages to Alternative Fuel Cars

5000 off Your Next Nuclear Car in the UK

Home » Categories » Automotive » Fuel Efficiency » A Case For Electric Cars: Part 3 - Alternatives » Reprint Rights » Printer Friendly

J.D. Kennedy

A Case For Electric Cars: Part 3 - Alternatives

Rated 3.5 out of 5
Rated 3.2 by 1 Reader ?
Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by J.D. Kennedy
Submitted Wednesday, September 23, 2009
J.D. Kennedy (233)
J.D. Kennedy

http://CleanEnergySolutionZ.com
Log in to become a member of J.D. Kennedy's Fan Club!


Why an electric car? What about Biofuel... or Alcohol... or Natural Gas (CNG)... or Hydrogen? A very good question (or series of questions). Let's take a look at the fundamental difference between electric propulsion and other alternate fuels.

Simply put: Electric motors do not explode. All other alternative fuels must be ignited, causing contained explosions that cause violent internal motion to drive a shaft. Every bit of engineering that goes into an internal combustion engine involves keeping these explosions, and the heat associated with them, controlled. That goes for bio-diesel, ethanol (and all other alcohol-based fuels), CNG (and all other natural gas derivitives), and Hydrogen. The electric vehicle burns nothing, and therefore has zero-emissions. With burning comes emission. With emissions comes... the EPA.

Ironically, the Clean Air act is one of the biggest factors holding back alternative fuel conversions. Each and every internal combustion engine off the line is meticulously inspected and given the federal seal-of-approval. Did you know that tampering with the emissions system of a vehicle's engine is a federal crime? Most people don't realize that. To legally overcome this, each converted engine type must be inspected at the cost of the individual or company converting it and a permit must be applied for, at a cost of $50,000 initially, and $10,000 every year afterward - per engine . Any given vehicle can have at least 2 engine types per model year. This is makes a legal internal combustion conversion unreachable for the individual, and burdensome for any company. You can get around this by converting a much older car (pre OBD-II computer), say 15 years old or more. So, yes, I could convert my '87 Volvo to run on propane or CNG (something I've been thinking of doing), and still be legal, but then I have to determine if it is going to last long enough to pay for itself when it's already falling apart at the seams. So, if you really like your '92 Buick or your Olds 88 and you've taken immaculate care of it, by all means, convert it to CNG (that is if you can find a mechanic who will do it - I don't recommend tackling this one yourself).

On the other hand, why don't big car companies just start building all their cars to run on bio-fuel, Ethanol, CNG, or all of the above (e.g. Flex-fuel)? Another excellent question. One that is not so easily answered. Sure, most car companies have been slowly developing these vehicles and introducing them to the public even slower - or not at all. Honda is a perfect example. They've developed a CNG-powered Civic and a beautiful hydrogen fuel-cell vehicle, Called the Clarity. These are on-the-road-now, proven-to-work vehicles. Technologically speaking, we are already there. Implementation is another matter. When asked why we can't get these, they simply say, "no demand" or "no infrastructure." Car companies seem to be waiting for infrastructure (e.g. alt-fuel stations), the infrastructure seems to be waiting for people, and the people are waiting for the cars. It is difficult to justify the cost of infrastructure if there are few alt-fuel vehicles on the road. Kind of a chicken-or-egg thing.

Given the obstacles and the cost involved in most alternative fuel conversions, it is just not practical at this time for most people. But electric cars are entirely different. Imagine taking your newly converted EV to the emissions testing station, then just sit and watch them look for a tailpipe. "Oh, I forgot to tell you... It's electric." Test passed.

If you want a late model alternative fuel vehicle (10 y/o or newer), going electric is your best option right now. I'm converting my car to electric right now, and you can join me. Check out my web site for some ideas.

In part 4, let's take a look at the future of electric cars.



tweet this!

The author of this article has chosen to make this article available with free reprint rights.
Click here to copy this article.

Reprint Rights

Log in to become a member of J.D. Kennedy's Fan Club!

There are a total of 2 comments on this article.
Most recent comment threads on this article:


» left by Chris Jones (27) (15 hours 23 minutes ago.)
   New Comment!   
Hi, electric cars can be a good idea, depending on how far you need to travel. Good read thank you.

Respond to this comment

» left by J.D. Kennedy (243)
J.D. Kennedy
(5 hours 17 minutes ago.)

   New Comment!   
Yes Chris. I agree. Yet, it's kind of a frame-of-mind. We've all gotten used to just how far we can go on a tank of gas. Just think if they had introduced the technology for us to travel 1000 miles on a tank of gas (or whatever) 50 years ago. Most people wouldn't think of settling for a 300-400 mile range if they were used to getting 1000 miles. It didn't take long for the gasoline industry to make the way for the ICE. It's taken longer for the electric car, mainly because there's not as much profit in it. Of course, they're working on that too.

Respond to this comment

Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 23 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 9/23/2009 10:40:36 AM.
View other articles written by J.D. Kennedy (233)
J.D. Kennedy


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Correct Tire Pressure For Better Fuel Efficiency and Optimal Vehicle Handling

The Electric Car Conversion Kit is Dead - 5 Lessons From the Front Line of Electric Car Conversions

Easy Steps to Protect the Environment While Driving

Can You Save Money With Generic Gas and Not Harm Your Car?

A Case For Electric Cars: Part 3 - Alternatives

A Case For Electric Cars: Part 4 - The Future

Car Runs on Water - See the Pic

14 Tried and True Gas Savers, Tips

Warming Your Car in Winter Can Burn a Hole in Your Pocket

Cold Temperatures Lower Your Fuel Economy

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.016.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company