Log in to become a member of Denny Smith's Fan Club!
Most of us prefer a version of the Bible today that is a little more up to date in its language than is the old original American Standard Version of 1901 or the King James Version thus making the Bible a little easier to read and understand. However, in a few passages scattered about the Bible even the new literal translations like the ESV, NASB, and the NKJV, all excellent translations when taken as a whole, have led us slightly astray with inferior translations in an attempt to make reading easier for us.
One such example is found in Rom. 1:31. In Romans 1 Paul toward the middle of the chapter begins to talk about the ungodliness and unrighteousness of men (v. 18) and then in the last few verses lists a series of sins into which mankind had fallen. Verse 31 is a part of this listing and reads as follows from the New King James version, "undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful."
However, read this same verse from the King James Version and it reads as follows, "Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful." The ASV of 1901 reads the same as the KJV except that it omits the word "implacable."
Here is a case where both of these older translations are more accurate than any of the newer ones, more accurate in exactness of the meaning of the original Greek words used (feel free to do your own research).
For covenant breakers the ESV has faithless, the NAS and the NKJV have untrustworthy. These words are close enough you can see where the modern day translators were coming from but they still stray in my mind from the exact intent of the original. The original is not talking about general untrustworthiness but specific untrustworthiness in being a breaker of a covenant one has made with another.
Hear the words of Malachi 2:13-16 and for this I will use the NKJV simply because it reads easier and is still accurate. "And this is the second thing you do: You cover the altar of the Lord with tears, with weeping and crying; so he does not regard the offering anymore, nor receive it with goodwill from your hands. Yet you say, For what reason?' Because the Lord has been witness between you and the wife of your youth, with whom you have dealt treacherously; yet she is your companion and your wife by covenant. But did he not make them one, having a remnant of the Spirit? And why one? He seeks godly offspring. Therefore take heed to your spirit, and let none deal treacherously with the wife of his youth. For the Lord God of Israel says that he hates divorce, for it covers one's garment with violence,' says the Lord of hosts. Therefore take heed to your spirit, that you do not deal treacherously.'"
When a man and woman marry they make a solemn covenant between each other and God. To break that covenant would be exactly what the Greek word used in Rom. 1:31 is talking about. But, there is more. How many times in reading the Old Testament do you run across the word covenant in connection with covenants God made with his people and they with him? How many times did his people break those covenants?
I did a quick e-sword search on the NKJV concordance for the word covenant in the New Testament and the word popped up 31 times in 28 total verses. The New Testament is sometimes called the New Covenant (it is listed as that on the title page of the copy I have of the original American Standard Version of 1901).
As Christians we have entered into a covenant relationship with God. When Jesus died on the cross and we come to accept him as Lord, Savior, and King of our life by gospel obedience we have entered into a covenant relationship with him. Remember his words, "This is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins." (Matt. 26:28 NKJV)
Paul spoke of himself and his cohorts as "ministers of the new covenant." (1 Cor. 3:6 NKJV) "Jesus has become a surety of a better covenant" (Heb. 722 NKJV) says the Hebrew writer. It is said to be a "better covenant" than that which was under the law of Moses with better promises. (Heb. 8:6) To be a covenant breaker whether between husband and wife or a Christian and his God is a serious matter.
"Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing," says the Hebrew writer (Heb. 10:29 NKJV). We must be as good as our word and if we are not we need to repent and get to being that good. This easy covenant breaking we have today is not going to get it with God whether the covenant we are breaking is with our wife or husband or with God.
The other phrase I want to talk about from Rom. 1:31 is the words, "without natural affection." In the ESV the Greek is translated by one word, the word "heartless," the NAS has "unloving," and the NKJV also uses the word "unloving." As said earlier, if you will do your homework you will find the old King James Version has it correct as to the exact meaning of the Greek. A person might be heartless and unloving in general and still not be "without natural affection."
Vine's, "An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words," a standard work Bible scholars consult regularly in order to see what the original Greek behind the English word means says this, "signifies without natural affectionlove of kindred, especially of parents for children and children for parents." The Greek is the word "astorgos."
An example of natural affection is found in the story of the two women (harlots) who while living together gave birth to sons 3 days apart. The one woman lay on her son in the night killing him by accident. She then claimed the other woman's son as her own. The matter was taken before King Solomon who heard both women claiming the boy as their own. In his wisdom King Solomon proposed to have the son killed by the sword and both women given a half knowing the real mother would be willing to give up the child to have his life spared. Natural affection led to this very result with the real mother pleading for the life of the son willing to give him up to the other woman to save his life. "O my lord, give her the living child, and by no means kill him!" (1 Kings 3:26 NKJV)
What is natural affection if it is not God given, natural, by nature? It is hard for most of us to understand how this can be, that one would not have natural affection, and yet Paul says some have this sin in their life. In writing Romans 1 he includes it with a long list of many sins about which he says in closing, "that those who practice such things are worthy of death." (Rom. 1:32 NKJV) We read in the Old Testament of some offering their babies up for burnt sacrifices. In 2 Kings 17 one reads of the sins that caused God to allow Israel to be carried away into captivity. One of these sins was that, "they caused their sons and daughters to pass through the fire." (2 Kings 17:17 NKJV) This was a sin associated with the worship of idols.
Manasseh, the king of Judah, became guilty of the same thing, "he caused his sons to pass through the fire in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom." (2 Chron. 33:6 NKJV) God in the book of Jeremiah said, "And they have built the high places of Tophet, which is in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, nor did it come into my heart." (Jer. 7:31 NKJV)
This shows me at least two things. (1) The depth and degree to which men can sink when they get involved with false doctrine. Radical Islam comes to mind where men can slit a man's throat with a knife while he is living, the burning of Christians at the stake, feeding them to the lions, etc.. (2) The lack of natural affection of a father or mother for their child.
However, it can work the other way as well, children against the parents. About every Bible reader is acquainted with the attempt by David's son Absalom to overthrow him. One can read about Absalom's revolt beginning in 2 Sam. 15 and every indication is that David felt Absalom would put him to death if he had the opportunity and could capture him.
Many years later Jesus spoke of a time not far distant from when he spoke that, "brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; and children will rise up against parents and cause them to be put to death." (Mark 13:12 NKJV) From time to time we read or hear in the news of children abusing aged parents. In fact, Jesus talked about this very thing, although not speaking of physical abuse, in Matt. 15. He accused the scribes and Pharisees of not honoring their parents, not be willing to help them (Matt. 15:1-6).
Yes, these are all extreme cases but if men can fall into the depth of sin to the degree they are willing to do these things then certainly there is such a thing as lack of natural affection which none can deny. The lack of natural affection can manifest itself in many ways. But, in whatever way it manifests itself the sin of the heart remains the same. The sin of lacking natural affection is simply the sin of not loving.
"For this is the message that you heard from the beginning, that we should love one another." (1 John 3:11 NKJV) "He who does not love his brother abides in death." (1 John 3:14 NKJV) One would do well to read the book of 1 John where the word love is used 36 times in the New King James Version.
What is the lesson for you and me? If we lack natural affection it is not something we are incapable of doing anything about. All sin begins in the heart unless one is talking about sins of ignorance. If the Bible teaches anything at all it teaches that men and their hearts can be changed. Saul had a hand in seeing Christians put to death (Acts 26:10) but God and his word changed him into the apostle Paul. Paul said there was a reason for that that he might be an example.
I use the New Living Translation here not because I think it is the most accurate translation of the passage but because I think as a commentary it has hit the nail on the head of what the verse teaches. I refer to 1 Tim. 1:16 where Paul says, "But God had mercy on me so that Christ Jesus could use me as a prime example of his great patience with even the worst sinners. Then others will realize that they, too, can believe in him and receive eternal life." (NLT)
It is not a matter of saying I was just born without it, without natural affection, what can I do? We are the way we are because of attitudes we have developed over time. Saul was not loving toward those families he tore apart casting a mother, dad, son, or daughter into prison and possibly seeing them put to death depending on the case. Even so he became a changed man.
The apostle John reached a point where he no longer had any desire to have fire called down from heaven to consume those who rejected them (Luke 9:54) but given a lifetime came to be known to us today as the apostle of love.
Those 3,000 converted on the day of Pentecost who yelled for the Son of God to be put to death had their hearts changed from hatred and murder to love and compassion. Christ can change us. It all comes down to a matter of our wills. Do we want to be known as the man or woman who lacked natural affection or the man or woman who truly loved his/her family deeply? It is a matter of personal choice just as much as salvation is. Natural affection goes with salvation as much as the lack of it goes with condemnation.
Love is a choice. I cannot emphasize that too much. Love is a choice and remember we are talking here about natural affection. When you begin to love rather than hate you will find life to be much happier. Where do you begin? You begin from within, within your heart. You begin with your will. God can change your heart, your life, but you have to want it first. When you want it you will begin seeking it and when you seek you shall find (Matt. 7:8).
Denny Smith is a Christian writer who not only writes and posts articles here but also on his web site http://www.dennysmith.net. You will also find on his web site some outstanding free audio sermons preached directly from the pulpit by a friend of his, Waymon Swain.There are over 110 audio sermons on many different topics.Just click and listen.
Disclaimer: All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any
information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional
or organization.
tweet this!