Writers' Community!
Home Page Two Columnists Q&A Submit an Article FAQs Contact Author Login
Article Submission
We Need YOUR Articles!
We'll Promote Them for FREE!

Author Login

New Authors
Register Here


Now Serving 8,190 Authors
71,878 Quality Articles
& 2,619 Current Users Online!
Featured Authors
Linda DeWitt (1,955)
Edward Rhymes (8,802)
Brianna Popsickle (2,452)
Teresa Ortiz (11,094)
Julian Price (13,305)
Stephany Springer (41,414)
Abigail Richards (9,854)
E. Raymond Rock (3,087)
Terry Mitchell (5,358)
Mark Parsec (16,695)
Nenita Wells (2,071)
Ira Coffin (12,696)
Krystal Kuehn (1,269)
Michael Ramzy (829)

View All Featured Authors
Most Recent
Common Reasons That Might Lead You To Sue A Surgeon

Sleep Related And Work Related Road Accidents Increasing - How You Can Stay Safe

Workplace Stress Accident Claims

Accidents At Work Due To Decrease Due To Footwear?

Legal Domestic Abuse - The Reality of Family Violence and Institutionalized Abuse

Strange and Humorous Canadian Laws

DUI Defense: Advice from a Tennessee DUI Attorney

Work Vehicle Crash Injury? Could Your Employer be Liable?

Speeding and Radar

What Should You Do With Your Compensation From A Whiplash Claim?

Home » Categories » Legal » Other Legal » South London Man Wins 80,000 Against Employer For Crush Accident » Printer Friendly

South London Man Wins 80,000 Against Employer For Crush Accident

No Reader Ratings Available ? Rate It  /  View Comments  /  View All Articles submitted by Nick Jervis
Submitted Thursday, October 22, 2009
Nick Jervis (407)
Samson Consulting Limited
Add to your Favorite Articles - Join Nick Jervis's Fan Club


Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work Act of 197 states that ""it shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far is as reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees". Recently, a case has come before the Health and Safety Executive that sends out a clear message to other companies to ensure that they live up to the responsibilities they have to their employees.

In the case, an 80 kg faulty piece of machinery, used to sort soiled towels, fell 10 feet, crushing the engineering manager. The manager had been trying to retrieve a towel from the machine at the time, after it had become jammed in a conveyor belt. Could it have been argued that the accident was the manager's fault? The HSE's investigation found that the employee had been temporarily given Health and Safety duties at the time, but had never been given adequate training. In addition, the engineering team had not been provided with a manual that would have clearly shown how to solve the problem, and therefore averted the accident. The result for the employee was nearly three weeks in a coma with multiple broken bones and internal injuries. The result for the company at the centre of the investigation was an £80,000 payout. The Health and Safety Inspector assigned to the case said that all companies must make sure that "they are protecting their employees effectively. It is no good to anyone if problems are only found after it is too late".

While £80,000 might seem a significant sum of money, it should be remembered that the victim has had to undergo major surgery and rehabilitative treatment. The accident itself occurred in October of 2007 and, in the two years it took for the case to be concluded, it has been reported that he has had to have a number of major operations and a series of skin grafts to save his legs. In addition, there may have been other costs incurred for other treatments and it is not known how his recovery has affected his ability to return to work.

Compensation is not a payout to satisfy a worker who feels he has been hard done-by. Often, as in the case above, it is there to pay for treatments that restore the victim back to health. After all, the accident was found not to have been his fault and, therefore, someone has to be liable for the injuries sustained. In this case, it was the employer, who had not lived up to his duty of care for his employees; a legal requirement.

In the unfortunate event that you are the victim of an accident at work that could have been prevented through training, risk assessment or the issue of appropriate safety-equipment, you should seek the services of an accident injury work lawyer. Unfortunately, many employers still put their employees at risk and it is only by speaking out that these risks can be identified and minimised.

--------

Visit Work Accident Solicitors if you have been Injured At Work.

Read our free Work Accidents Guide to discover everything you need to know about making a Work Accident Claim.

Nick Jervis is a solicitor (non-practising) and a consultant to Work Accident Solicitors who specialise in Work Accident Claims.






Reprint Rights

Join Nick Jervis's Fan Club

No comments yet.


Was this article helpful to you? Leave a Public Comment or Question:

This Article has been viewed 2 times.
Article added to SearchWarp.com on 10/22/2009 10:51:56 AM.
View other articles written by Nick Jervis (407)


If you found this article interesting, you may want to check out:

Disclaimer:  All information on this site is provided for informational purposes only! By no means is any information presented herein intended to substitute for the advice provided to you by any health care or other professional or organization.


Today's Most Popular
Contracts: Express and Implied

DBA Law - Don't Get Caught - Get a DBA.

How does Luminol help solve crimes?

Interview Questions For A Lawyer

How Do Bail Bonds Work?

Juvenile Delinquency And Capital Punishment

Overtime Pay Rights Under Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Fingerprints - how fingerprints solve crime

Estate Planning - No Contest Clause in your Will

Cigarettes, More Dangerous Than Alcohol?

Viewed from Cache. Load Time: 0.030.

Home  |  Page Two  |  FAQ's  |  Contact  |  Terms of Service  |  Article Submission Guidelines  |  Questions & Answers  |  Privacy  |  Mission / About
Copyright © 1999-2009 SearchWarp.com, All Rights Reserved - SearchWarp.com is an IcoLogic, Inc. Company