Mihail Vrapcea

Can we improve the Human Society?

Convert this page to a PDF
Posted: Tuesday, December 29, 2009

by Mihail Vrapcea

Let us see if an "organism type" society, described below, will bring us more advantages than the current existent human societies.

For the beginning, is there any similarity between the way people live together in a country and the way cells live together in a living organism?

Let us mention here just three of them:

Societal level - Organism level

* food production, delivery (agriculture, food stores) - digestive system
* security (police, army) - immunity system
* resources transfer among people (money, goods etc.) - circulatory system

Therefore, we already have the tendency to this kind of society, in other words, we are on the right path, but it may take many years until we actually achieve it.

Next, we can mention just three main advantages of such an "organism type" society:

* All employed
Each individual will be motivated to do something useful for humanity as each cell is doing something useful for the entire organism.

* Improved interpersonal relationship
We should accomplish such a level of behavioral education that all humans will understand and help each other while living together, like the cells of our body (assuring the healthy life of the organism with no conflict between them).

* More equitable distribution of resources
In an organism, no cell is left without the minimum resources required to live. This is preferable to happen in a human society too.
Also, corresponding to the different kinds of cells, using more or less resources (as an example the brain cells are the biggest consumers), some people will need more resources than others, but there will be less waste than now, when most rich people are not using the resources in the optimal way (biggest part of them not being spent yet for research and education specially, to follow the similarity with the brain's consumption mentioned above).

However, the "organism type" human society seems to be even better than an organism, because most people are able to have different jobs in different areas, but in an organism most cells are able to do only their specific function.

Author
Mihail Vrapcea
Romania, Europe

P.S. I can place here one of my predictions that, in the future, having more powerful computers and following the tendency to solve any problem "from the root", from the atomic level (as nanotechnology is working at the molecular level already), it will be possible to synthesize any substance, actually anything (any object) by starting only with Hydrogen and using, let us say, some very thin laser beams, emitted from different positions (angles) to "push" and arrange in space the atoms (nuclei and electrons), one by one, in the corresponding positions, following the default matrix stored in a database, according with what substance/object we want to create (or by rearranging the particles from useless things, such as garbage).

In this way we will be able to create anything very conveniently, any object "made from scratch", like a "copy and paste" process: food, cars, etc. so that all people will be rich, having anything they want. Unfortunately, only then all people will understand that having knowledge / education (good behavior and useful information) is more important than having material things.
This Article has been viewed 2,726 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.